World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6708
World Ranking
9135
National Ranking
4844

Leanne K. Knobloch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne K. Knobloch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Leanne K. Knobloch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leanne K. Knobloch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leanne K. Knobloch is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on clinical psychology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Trajectories of relational turbulence and affectionate communication across the post-deployment transition, 2021, published in Communication Monographs
  • Relationship changes of military couples during reintegration: A longitudinal analysis, 2020, published in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Moral injury among first responders: Experience, effects, and advice in their own words, 2024, published in Psychological Services
  • Relationship maintenance among military couples, 2022, published in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Assessing the REBOOT First Responders program: Physical, mental, and social health outcomes, 2021, published in Traumatology An International Journal

Leanne K. Knobloch's frequent co-authors include:

  • Jenny L. Owens
  • Lynne M. Knobloch-Fedders
  • Jeremy B. Yorgason
  • Robyn L. Gobin
  • J. Kale Monk

The main topics of their work cover various aspects related to mental health and social relationships, including:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Family Support in Illness

The scholar has published frequently in several venues, among which the most common are:

  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Traumatology An International Journal
  • Family Relations
  • Military Psychology
  • Journal of Religion and Health

Their subfields of study further define their expertise, focusing on:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Epidemiology

Leanne K. Knobloch's body of work explores critical issues such as the dynamics of military couples, the effects of moral injury among first responders, and the broader influence of trauma and resilience on mental health. This interdisciplinary approach integrates psychological theory and social science perspectives to address clinical and societal challenges.

Best Publications

  • Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations

    Denise Haunani Solomon;Leanne K. Knobloch

  • Information Seeking Beyond Initial Interaction: Negotiating Relational Uncertainty within Close Relationships

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • Topic Avoidance in Developing Romantic Relationships Associations with Intimacy and Relational Uncertainty

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Katy E. Carpenter-Theune

  • The role of relationship development and attachment in the experience of romantic jealousy

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon;Michael G. Cruz

  • Relationship Uncertainty, Partner Interference, and Intimacy within Dating Relationships

    Denise Haunani Solomon;Leanne K. Knobloch

  • Relational Turbulence Theory: Explaining Variation in Subjective Experiences and Communication Within Romantic Relationships

    Denise Haunani Solomon;Leanne K. Knobloch;Jennifer A. Theiss;Rachel M. McLaren

  • Relational Uncertainty and Relational Information Processing Questions without Answers

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • Perceptions of turmoil within courtship: Associations with intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners

    Leanne K. Knobloch

  • The content of relational uncertainty within marriage

    Leanne K. Knobloch

  • Information Seeking Beyond Initial Interaction.

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • Intimacy and the magnitude and experience of episodic relational uncertainty within romantic relationships

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • An actor—partner interdependence model of relational turbulence: Cognitions and emotions

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Jennifer A. Theiss

  • Depressive symptoms and mechanisms of relational turbulence as predictors of relationship satisfaction among returning service members.

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Jennifer A. Theiss

  • Experiences of U.S. military couples during the post-deployment transition Applying the relational turbulence model

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Jennifer A. Theiss

  • Interference and facilitation from partners in the development of interdependence within romantic relationships

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Denise Haunani Solomon

  • Using the relational turbulence model to understand negative emotion within courtship

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Laura E. Miller;Katy E. Carpenter

  • Perceived involvement of network members in courtships: A test of the relational turbulence model

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Erin Donovan-Kicken

  • Relational Uncertainty and Message Processing in Marriage

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Laura E. Miller;Bradley James Bond;Sarah E. Mannone

  • Relational Uncertainty and Relationship Talk within Courtship: A Longitudinal Actor–Partner Interdependence Model

    Leanne K. Knobloch;Jennifer A. Theiss

Frequent Co-Authors

Denise Haunani Solomon
Denise Haunani Solomon Pennsylvania State University
C. Emily Durbin
C. Emily Durbin Michigan State University
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick
Mary Anne Fitzpatrick University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Abigail H. Gewirtz
Abigail H. Gewirtz University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up a wide range of career options in counseling, therapy, research, and mental health services. For those interested in becoming a licensed counselor, it’s crucial to understand the state-specific requirements for licensure. Many states have unique criteria for education, supervised experience, and examination.

For example, becoming an LPC in Hawaii requires meeting all Hawaii licensed professional counselor requirements, including graduate education and supervised practice. If you’re considering a career in Idaho, review all lpc license requirements in Idaho to understand specific clinical experience and exam standards.

If Illinois is your destination, be sure to check the latest lpc licensure requirements in Illinois. For those seeking opportunities in Indiana, familiarize yourself with lpc license requirements in Indiana to plan your educational path.

Taking an online degree can help meet these requirements flexibly, but always verify the program’s accreditation and that it aligns with your state’s licensing board. Careful planning ensures your psychology degree opens doors to rewarding career pathways, wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Leanne K. Knobloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles