World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
11236
World Ranking
6741
National Ranking
2974

Kwei-Jay Lin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwei-Jay Lin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 234 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kwei-Jay Lin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kwei-Jay Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to imprecise computations for scheduling real-time systems

Overview

Kwei-Jay Lin is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and engineering, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, information systems, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their scholarly output includes 18 publications in computer science and 7 in engineering. Subfields of study central to their work include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Biomedical Engineering

The main topics of their research cover a broad spectrum, notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Frequent publication venues associated with Kwei-Jay Lin include:

  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • ACM Transactions on Information Systems
  • Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • Analytica Chimica Acta
  • Electronics

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • "XKT: Toward Explainable Knowledge Tracing Model With Cognitive Learning Theories for Questions of Multiple Knowledge Concepts," 2024, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • "Hadoop Perfect File: A fast and memory-efficient metadata access archive file to face small files problem in HDFS," 2021, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing
  • "AutoCoach: An Intelligent Driver Behavior Feedback Agent with Personality-Based Driver Models," 2021, Electronics
  • "LkeRec: Toward Lightweight End-to-End Joint Representation Learning for Building Accurate and Effective Recommendation," 2021, ACM Transactions on Information Systems
  • "AI integration into wavelength-based SPR biosensing: Advancements in spectroscopic analysis and detection," 2025, Analytica Chimica Acta

Frequent co-authors contributing to the body of work alongside Kwei-Jay Lin include:

  • Surong Yan
  • Haosen Wang
  • Meng Yu
  • Chenglong Shi
  • Bo-Lung Tsai

Kwei-Jay Lin was recognized as an IEEE Fellow in 2010 for contributions to imprecise computations for scheduling real-time systems.

Best Publications

  • Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints

    Tao Yu;Yue Zhang;Kwei-Jay Lin

  • Algorithms for scheduling imprecise computations

    J.W.S. Liu;K.-J. Lin;W.-K. Shih;A.C.-s. Yu

  • Service selection algorithms for Web services with end-to-end QoS constraints

    Tao Yu;Kwei-Jay Lin

  • Imprecise computations

    J.W.S. Liu;Wei-Kuan Shih;Kwei-Jay Lin;R. Bettati

  • Scheduling periodic jobs that allow imprecise results

    J.-Y. Chung;J.W.S. Liu;K.-J. Lin

  • Imprecise results: Utilizing partial computations in real-time systems

    Kwei-Jay Lin;Swaminathan Natarajan;Jane W.-S. Liu

  • Dynamic priority ceilings: a concurrency control protocol for real-time systems

    Min-Ih Chen;Kwei-Jay Lin

  • Service selection algorithms for composing complex services with multiple qos constraints

    Tao Yu;Kwei-Jay Lin

  • Service-oriented computing

    M. Bichier;K.-J. Lin

  • On real-time databases: concurrency control and scheduling

    P.S. Yu;Kun-Lung Wu;Kwei-Jay Lin;S.H. Son

  • A broker-based framework for QoS-aware Web service composition

    Tao Yu;K.-J. Lin

  • Distance-constrained scheduling and its applications to real-time systems

    Ching-Chih Han;Kwei-Jay Lin;Chao-Ju Hou

  • Scheduling real-time, periodic jobs using imprecise results

    Jane W. S. Liu;Kwei-Jay Lin;Swaminathan Natarajan

  • Web services computing: advancing software interoperability

    Jen-Yao Chung;Kwei-Jay Lin;R.G. Mathieu

  • Implementing a general real-time scheduling framework in the RED-Linux real-time kernel

    Y.-C. Wang;K.-J. Lin

  • Building flexible real-time systems using the Flex language

    K.B. Kenny;K.-J. Lin

  • A reputation and trust management broker framework for Web applications

    Kwei-Jay Lin;Haiyin Lu;Tao Yu;Chia-en Tai

  • Real-Time Database Systems: Issues and Applications

    Azer Bestavros;Sang H. Son;Kwei-Jay Lin

  • Scheduling distance-constrained real-time tasks

    C.-C. Han;K.-J. Lin

  • Reputation-Oriented Trustworthy Computing in E-Commerce Environments

    Yan Wang;Kwei-Jay Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Yung-jen Hsu
Jane Yung-jen Hsu National Taiwan University
Sang H. Son
Sang H. Son University of Virginia
Yan Wang
Yan Wang Macquarie University
Tei-Wei Kuo
Tei-Wei Kuo National Taiwan University
Azer Bestavros
Azer Bestavros Boston University
Philip S. Yu
Philip S. Yu University of Illinois at Chicago
Kun-Lung Wu
Kun-Lung Wu IBM (United States)
Duncan S. Wong
Duncan S. Wong City University of Hong Kong
Vijay Varadharajan
Vijay Varadharajan University of Newcastle Australia
Bin Xu
Bin Xu Shenzhen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and professional pathways. Many students pursue specialized fields closely linked to technology, such as online cybersecurity degree programs, which equip learners with skills to protect data and fight cybercrime—both rapidly growing career areas.

For those interested in management within technical or practical environments, exploring a cheap online construction management degree can connect your tech knowledge with industry leadership roles and logistical problem-solving.

Criminal justice is another pathway often intersecting with technology through forensics, digital evidence, and security. If this area interests you, it’s important to consider a criminal justice degree price as you look for affordable programs preparing you for legal and investigative careers.

Additionally, proficiency in business and finance can be enhanced by taking accounting classes online. This supports roles in tech companies or startups needing expertise in budgeting, payroll, and financial analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Kwei-Jay Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles