World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
13640
World Ranking
4884
National Ranking
2317

Kent Bach publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent Bach sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Kent Bach D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent Bach sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kent Bach is affiliated with San Francisco State University in the United States. Their academic profile does not list recent publications, co-authors, or detailed research topics explicitly at this time.

No specific papers, publication venues, or citation counts are recorded in the available data. There are also no listed book publications or awards attributed to Kent Bach to provide further insight into their academic contributions.

The main and subfields of study, as well as particular research topics, are not specified in the current information provided, so no detailed description of research areas can be included.

Despite the limited data on scholarly output and collaborations, the affiliation with a known academic institution indicates engagement in teaching or research activities within their academic capacity.

Best Publications

  • Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts

    Kent Bach;Robert M. Harnish

  • The Myth of Conventional Implicature

    Kent Bach

  • Thought and Reference

    Kent Bach

  • You Don't Say?

    Kent Bach

  • The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters

    Kent Bach

  • Conversational Impliciture KENT BACH

    Unknown

  • Varieties of Reference

    Kent Bach

  • Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs

    Kent Bach

  • The top 10 misconceptions about implicature

    Kent Bach

  • Context ex Machina

    Kent Bach

  • An Analysis of Self-Deception

    Kent Bach

  • Quantification, Qualification and Context A Reply to Stanley and Szabó

    Kent Bach

  • DEFAULT REASONING: JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS AND KNOWING WHEN TO THINK TWICE

    Kent Bach

  • Speech Acts and Pragmatics

    Kent Bach

  • GIORGIONE WAS SO-CALLED BECAUSE OF HIS NAME

    Kent Bach

  • APPLYING PRAGMATICS TO EPISTEMOLOGY

    Kent Bach

  • Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Language

    Kent Bach

  • A Rationale for Reliabilism

    Kent Bach

  • How performatives really work: A reply to Searle

    Kent Bach;Kent Bach;Robert M. Harnish;Robert M. Harnish

  • A representational theory of action

    Kent Bach

  • Standardization vs. conventionalization

    Kent Bach

  • The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism without Minimal Propositions

    Kent Bach

  • Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts

    Georgia M. Green;Kent Bach;Robert M. Harnish

  • Replies to My Critics

    Kent Bach

Frequent Co-Authors

Gilbert Harman
Gilbert Harman Princeton University
Fred Dretske
Fred Dretske Stanford University
Hilary Putnam
Hilary Putnam Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse possibilities for online education and career growth. Many students are choosing flexible options such as an online masters degree psychology for affordable and accessible paths into counseling, research, or applied psychology fields.

For those interested in educational leadership or policymaking, accelerated doctoral programs in education online allow you to fast-track your qualifications and enter advanced roles sooner. These programs are designed for working professionals who want to make an impact in education.

If time is of the essence, one year graduate programs enable students to earn respected credentials quickly, whether in social sciences, humanities, or education. This rapid approach can help launch or pivot your career with minimal disruption.

Undergraduate students can also benefit from online accelerated bachelor degree programs, which condense degree requirements so you can enter the job market or progress to graduate study faster.

Best Scientists Citing Kent Bach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles