World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
17524
World Ranking
19684
National Ranking
9804

Kenneth M. Moser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Moser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 305 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kenneth M. Moser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth M. Moser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth M. Moser was affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States throughout their academic career.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers, specific co-authors, or frequent publication venues linked to Kenneth M. Moser. Similarly, there is no detailed information on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics documented.

Kenneth M. Moser is deceased. Due to limited data on research output or academic contributions, the specific nature and scope of their scientific work cannot be further detailed.

Best Publications

  • Pulmonary vascular lesions occurring in patients with chronic major vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

    K M Moser;C M Bloor

  • Is Embolic Risk Conditioned By Location of Deep Venous Thrombosis

    Kenneth M. Moser;John R. LeMOINE

  • Chronic major-vessel thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

    K M Moser;W R Auger;P F Fedullo

  • Evidence of lung surfactant abnormality in respiratory failure. Study of bronchoalveolar lavage phospholipids, surface activity, phospholipase activity, and plasma myoinositol.

    M Hallman;R Spragg;J H Harrell;K M Moser

  • Frequent Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Deep Venous Thrombosis

    Kenneth M. Moser;Peter F. Fedullo;Judith K. LitteJohn;Rebekah Crawford

  • Experience and results with 150 pulmonary thromboendarterectomy operations over a 29-month period.

    Stuart W. Jamieson;William R. Auger;Peter F. Fedullo;Richard N. Channick

  • The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society.

    Tapson Vf;Carroll Ba;Davidson Bl;Elliott Cg

  • Long-term outcome after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.

    Carol J. Archibald;William R. Auger;Peter F. Fedullo;Richard N. Channick

  • Chronic major-vessel thromboembolic pulmonary artery obstruction: appearance at angiography.

    W R Auger;P F Fedullo;K M Moser;M Buchbinder

  • Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: clinical picture and surgical treatment

    K M Moser;W R Auger;P F Fedullo;S W Jamieson

  • Pulsed Delivery of Inhaled Nitric Oxide to Patients With Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: An Ambulatory Delivery System and Initial Clinical Tests

    Richard N. Channick;John W. Newhart;F. Wayne Johnson;Penny J. Williams

  • Changes in procoagulant and fibrinolytic gene expression during bleomycin-induced lung injury in the mouse

    Mitchell Alan Olman;Nigel Mackman;Candece L Gladson;Kenneth M. Moser

  • Cheyne-Stokes breathing during sleep in patients with left ventricular heart failure.

    Larry Findley;Clifford Zwillich;Sonia Ancoli-Israel;Daniel Kripke

  • Thromboendarterectomy for Chronic, Major-Vessel Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Immediate and Long-Term Results in 42 Patients

    Kenneth M. Moser;Pat O. Daily;Kirk Peterson;Walter Dembitsky

  • Perfusion scan findings understate the severity of angiographic and hemodynamic compromise in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

    Kathleen L. Ryan;Peter F. Fedullo;Gary B. Davis;Tony E. Vasquez

  • Opinions regarding the diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic disease

    Paul D. Stein;Samuel Z. Goldhaber;Alexander Gottschalk;Russell D. Hull

  • Successful surgical intervention in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

    Kenneth M. Moser;Nina S. Braunwald

  • Bronchial hyperreactivity in chronic obstructive bronchitis.

    Joe W. Ramsdell;Frederick J. Nachtwey;Kenneth M. Moser

  • Arterial Hypoxemia Induced by Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

    Robert E. Albertini;James H. Harrell;Naotsugu Kurihara;Kenneth M. Moser

  • Thromboendarterectomy for Chronic, Major-Vessel Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

    Kenneth M. Moser;Pat O. Daily;Kirk Peterson;Walter Dembitsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirk L. Peterson
Kirk L. Peterson University of California, San Diego
Stuart W. Jamieson
Stuart W. Jamieson University of California, San Diego
Pascal Nicod
Pascal Nicod University Hospital of Lausanne
Samuel Z. Goldhaber
Samuel Z. Goldhaber Brigham and Women's Hospital
Michael H. Crawford
Michael H. Crawford University of California, San Francisco
Peter D. Wagner
Peter D. Wagner University of California, San Diego
Richard J. Ulevitch
Richard J. Ulevitch Scripps Research Institute
David J. Loskutoff
David J. Loskutoff Scripps Research Institute
Charles G. Cochrane
Charles G. Cochrane Scripps Research Institute
Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Sonia Ancoli-Israel University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative education options can accelerate your journey in the medical field. Many students and working professionals are interested in flexible pathways that minimize on-site requirements. For registered nurses seeking advancement, rn to bsn programs without clinicals offer a convenient option, letting you earn your degree online without in-person clinical hours.

For those aspiring to become nurse leaders, advanced degrees are more accessible than ever. There are online dnp programs that are both reputable and efficient, helping you move forward without unnecessary delays. Some may also be interested in an even less hands-on approach; options like a dnp program without clinical hours eliminate many on-site commitments, making it easier for working nurses.

If you are looking to begin your healthcare career more quickly, lpn programs provide streamlined, online tracks to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time. These diverse pathways can help you find the right fit for your career goals, whether you're advancing your education or entering the medical field for the first time.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth M. Moser

Recently Published Articles