World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
18910
World Ranking
3754
National Ranking
1795

Kenneth de Jong publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth de Jong sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kenneth de Jong D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth de Jong sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth de Jong is a researcher affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their academic work primarily focuses on social sciences, with a specialization in sociology and political science. The primary area of interest is criminal justice and corrections analysis, which is reflected consistently in their research output.

The scientist has published in the Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind, a venue where their recent work appears. Among their publications is the 2023 paper entitled Mass Incarceration and Its Devastating Effects, which investigates critical topics within the domain of criminal justice.

  • Mass Incarceration and Its Devastating Effects (2023) - Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind

Kenneth de Jong has not been noted to have frequent co-authors, indicating a tendency towards independent research or a smaller collaborative network. The scientist's contributions are concentrated in a single academic journal, which correlates with their main research topics and fields.

  • Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind

  • Social Sciences

  • Sociology and Political Science

  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

The overall body of work provides insight into specialized subject matter concerning policies and societal impacts related to the criminal justice system. Kenneth de Jong's research contributes to a nuanced understanding of mass incarceration and its wider consequences.

Best Publications

  • A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization

    Mitchell A. Potter;Kenneth A. De Jong

  • Cooperative Coevolution: An Architecture for Evolving Coadapted Subcomponents

    Mitchell A. Potter;Kenneth A. De Jong

  • Evolutionary computation: a unified approach

    Kenneth A. De Jong

  • Using Genetic Algorithms for Concept Learning

    Kenneth A. De Jong;William M. Spears;Diana F. Gordon

  • The MONK's problems: A Performance Comparison of Different Learning Algorithms

    Sebastian B. Thrun;Jerzy W. Bala;Eric Bloedorn;Ivan Bratko

  • Using Genetic Algorithms to Solve NP-Complete Problems

    Kenneth A. De Jong;William M. Spears

  • Evolutionary computation and structural design: A survey of the state-of-the-art

    Rafal Kicinger;Tomasz Arciszewski;Kenneth De Jong

  • An Analysis of the Interacting Roles of Population Size and Crossover in Genetic Algorithms

    Kenneth A. De Jong;William M. Spears

  • An Analysis of Multi-Point Crossover

    William M. Spears;William M. Spears;Kenneth A. De Jong;Kenneth A. De Jong

  • An overview of evolutionary computation

    William M. Spears;Kenneth A. De Jong;Thomas Bäck;David B. Fogel

  • A formal analysis of the role of multi-point crossover in genetic algorithms

    Kenneth A. De Jong;William M. Spears

  • Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English

    Cynthia G. Clopper;David B. Pisoni;Kenneth de Jong

  • The Interplay Between Prosodic Structure and Coarticulation

    Kenneth de Jong;Mary E. Beckman;Jan Edwards

  • Genetic programming needs better benchmarks

    James McDermott;David R. White;Sean Luke;Luca Manzoni

  • Genetic Algorithms Are NOT Function Optimizers

    Kenneth A. De Jong

  • Genetic algorithms as a tool for feature selection in machine learning

    Unknown

  • Learning concept classification rules using genetic algorithms

    Kenneth A. De Jong;William M. Spears

  • An empirical analysis of collaboration methods in cooperative coevolutionary algorithms

    R. Paul Wiegand;William C. Liles;Kenneth A. De Jong

  • On the Choice of the Offspring Population Size in Evolutionary Algorithms

    Thomas Jansen;Kenneth A. De Jong;Ingo Wegener

  • The influence of migration sizes and intervals on island models

    Zbigniew Skolicki;Kenneth De Jong

  • Measurement of population diversity

    Ronald W. Morrison;Kenneth A. De Jong

  • Are Genetic Algorithms Function Optimizers

    Kenneth A. De Jong

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Grefenstette
John J. Grefenstette University of Pittsburgh
Carlotta Domeniconi
Carlotta Domeniconi George Mason University
Anastasia Kitsantas
Anastasia Kitsantas George Mason University
Ryszard S. Michalski
Ryszard S. Michalski George Mason University
Tzyy-Ping Jung
Tzyy-Ping Jung University of California, San Diego
Ivan Bratko
Ivan Bratko University of Ljubljana
Donald S. Burke
Donald S. Burke University of Pittsburgh
Jeffrey L. Krichmar
Jeffrey L. Krichmar University of California, Irvine
Douglas A. Nitz
Douglas A. Nitz University of California, San Diego
David B. Pisoni
David B. Pisoni Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and online learning opportunities. If you’re looking to accelerate your studies, opting for the fastest computer science degree can help you enter the workforce sooner and start building your career more quickly.

Those interested in sustainability and technology can explore an environmental engineering online degree, which combines computer skills with solving real-world environmental challenges. Meanwhile, if you’re considering engineering but are concerned about finances, learning about mechanical engineering degree cost can help you choose a high-value and affordable path.

Physics is another popular STEM area that blends scientific theory and technology. Enrolling in online physics degrees allows for flexible study and can lead to careers in research, data analysis, and more. By exploring these options, you can find an online degree that matches your passion, budget, and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth de Jong

Trending Scientists