World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
14566
World Ranking
4165
National Ranking
106

Kasper Kok publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kasper Kok sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kasper Kok D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kasper Kok sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kasper Kok is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands and specializes in Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on global and planetary change, management science and operations research, economics and econometrics, artificial intelligence, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Demographic Modeling and Climate Adaptation
  • Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology

Kasper Kok has published extensively in several journals and platforms. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Regional Environmental Change
  • Ecology and Society
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Global Environmental Change

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework," 2020, Nature Climate Change
  • "Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making," 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture and food systems: The Eur-Agri-SSPs," 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • "Exploring Alternative Futures in the Anthropocene," 2023, Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • "Potential biodiversity change in Central Asian grasslands: scenarios for the impact of climate and land-use change," 2020, Regional Environmental Change

Frequent collaborators of Kasper Kok include:

  • Simona Pedde
  • Maria A. Gasalla
  • Derek P. Tittensor
  • Emma Archer
  • Israel Borokini

Best Publications

  • The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century

    Brian C. O'Neill;Elmar Kriegler;Kristie L. Ebi;Eric Kemp-Benedict

  • Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change

    Robert Gilmore Pontius;Wideke Boersma;Jean-Christophe Castella;Keith Clarke

  • A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use

    P.H. Verburg;G.H.J. de Koning;K. Kok;A. Veldkamp

  • Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework.

    Brian C. O'Neill;Brian C. O'Neill;Timothy R. Carter;Kristie L. Ebi;Paula A. Harrison

  • Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: Experiences from the SCENES project

    Kasper Kok;Mathijs van Vliet;Ilona Bärlund;Anna Dubel

  • Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean

    Mita Patel;Kasper Kok;Dale S. Rothman

  • Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change

    Peter H. Verburg;Kasper Kok;Robert Gilmore Pontius;A. Veldkamp

  • Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change

    Joost M. Vervoort;Joost M. Vervoort;Philip K. Thornton;Philip K. Thornton;Patti Kristjanson;Wiebke Förch

  • Linking Futures across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios

    Reinette Biggs;Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne;Carol Atkinson-Palombo;Erin Bohensky

  • Methods for Developing Multiscale Participatory Scenarios: Insights from Southern Africa and Europe

    Kasper Kok;Reinette Biggs;Monika Zurek

  • Managing the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems under water scarcity. The GLOBAQUA project

    Alícia Navarro-Ortega;Vicenç Acuña;Alberto Bellin;Peter Burek

  • Positive tipping points in a rapidly warming world

    J David Tàbara;Niki Frantzeskaki;Katharina Hölscher;Simona Pedde

  • The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems

    Frans Hermans;Frans Hermans;Marian Stuiver;P.J. Beers;Kasper Kok

  • A method and application of multi-scale validation in spatial land use models

    Kasper Kok;Andrew Farrow;A Veldkamp;Peter H Verburg

  • Identification of vulnerable areas for gully erosion under different scenarios of land abandonment in Southeast Spain

    J.P. Lesschen;K. Kok;P.H. Verburg;L.H. Cammeraat

  • Evaluating impact of spatial scales on land use pattern analysis in Central America

    Kasper Kok;A Veldkamp

  • Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research

    Bas J. van Ruijven;Marc A. Levy;Arun Agrawal;Frank Biermann

  • Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development

    Kasper Kok;Dale S. Rothman;Mita Patel

  • Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios

    Marcel T. J. Kok;Kasper Kok;Garry D. Peterson;Rosemary Hill

  • Governance, scale and the environment: the importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary arenas

    Marleen Buizer;Bas Arts;Kasper Kok

  • Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development

    Kasper Kok;Mita Patel;Dale S. Rothman;Giovanni Quaranta

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Veldkamp
A. Veldkamp University of Twente
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
Ian P. Holman
Ian P. Holman Cranfield University
Bas Arts
Bas Arts Wageningen University & Research
Elmar Kriegler
Elmar Kriegler Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Brian C. O'Neill
Brian C. O'Neill Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Reinette Biggs
Reinette Biggs Stellenbosch University
Philip K. Thornton
Philip K. Thornton Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences offers a variety of career opportunities, often intersecting with related fields like geology, geographic information systems (GIS), and public administration. For those seeking flexible options, some students explore the easiest degree to get that still supports foundational environmental knowledge, providing a stepping stone into the industry without overwhelming academic pressure.

For a more specialized focus, the best online geology degree programs are highly recommended. These online degrees combine theory and practical skills essential for tackling earth science challenges, making graduates highly employable in research and environmental consulting roles.

Likewise, GIS has become an indispensable tool in environmental science, helping professionals analyze spatial data to address ecological issues. Exploring a geographic information systems degree can enhance career prospects by equipping students with cutting-edge mapping and data analysis skills.

Additionally, for those interested in policy and management, pursuing a 1 year mpa online program can provide vital leadership training. This pathway helps environmental professionals influence public policy and lead sustainability initiatives effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Kasper Kok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles