World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
14824
World Ranking
3805
National Ranking
100

Julius Popp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Popp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 207 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Julius Popp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julius Popp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julius Popp is affiliated with the University Hospital of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on Alzheimer's disease, with extensive work in related neurodegenerative conditions and molecular mechanisms. The scientist's work spans multiple disciplines, including Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

Their studies cover various subfields such as Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, Neurology, and Genetics. Research interests include the pathophysiology and treatment of Alzheimer's disease, dementia and cognitive impairment, bioinformatics and genomic networks, genetic associations and epidemiology, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, tryptophan and brain disorders, and metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies.

Julius Popp has contributed to several recent publications. These include:

  • Pathophysiological subtypes of Alzheimer's disease based on cerebrospinal fluid proteomics, 2020, Brain
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis for Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, 2022, Acta Neuropathologica
  • An integrative multi-omics approach reveals new central nervous system pathway alterations in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • Cerebrospinal fluid tau levels are associated with abnormal neuronal plasticity markers in Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Plasma neurofilament light and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease pathology and clinical disease progression, 2021, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

They frequently co-author with researchers including Philip Scheltens, Pieter Jelle Visser, Pablo Martínez-Lage, Johannes Streffer, and Henrik Zetterberg.

Julius Popp's research is commonly published in venues such as Alzheimer's & Dementia, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, and Research Square.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • High Cortisol and the Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of the Literature.

    Sami Ouanes;Julius Popp;Julius Popp

  • Glucose metabolism, gray matter structure, and memory decline in subjective memory impairment

    Lukas Scheef;Annika Spottke;Moritz Daerr;Alexius Joe

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores

    Itziar de Rojas;Itziar de Rojas;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Niccolo Tesi;Benjamin Grenier-Boley

  • Blood-brain barrier breakdown, neuroinflammation, and cognitive decline in older adults

    Gene L. Bowman;Loïc Dayon;Richard Kirkland;Jérôme Wojcik

  • Intravenous immunoglobulin for treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial

    Richard Dodel;Axel Rominger;Peter Bartenstein;Frederik Barkhof

  • Systemic and central nervous system metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease

    Vera van der Velpen;Vera van der Velpen;Tony Teav;Héctor Gallart-Ayala;Florence Mehl

  • Volume loss of the medial temporal lobe structures in subjective memory impairment.

    Nadine Striepens;Lukas Scheef;Andrea Wind;Julius Popp

  • Pathophysiological subtypes of Alzheimer's disease based on cerebrospinal fluid proteomics

    Betty M Tijms;Johan Gobom;Johan Gobom;Lianne Reus;Iris Jansen

  • Biomarker validation of a cued recall memory deficit in prodromal Alzheimer disease

    M. Wagner;S. Wolf;F.M. Reischies;M. Daerr

  • Inflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease plasma

    Angharad R Morgan;Samuel Touchard;Claire Leckey;Caroline O'Hagan

  • Soluble amyloid precursor proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid as novel potential biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter study.

    P Lewczuk;H Kamrowski-Kruck;O Peters;I Heuser

  • Cerebrospinal fluid cortisol and clinical disease progression in MCI and dementia of Alzheimer's type

    Julius Popp;Julius Popp;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Steffen Wolfsgruber;Isabella Heuser;Oliver Peters

  • Cerebral and extracerebral cholesterol metabolism and CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease

    Julius Popp;Sabrina Meichsner;Heike Kölsch;Piotr Lewczuk

  • KIBRA gene variants are associated with episodic memory in healthy elderly.

    K. Schaper;H. Kolsch;J. Popp;M. Wagner

  • Association of Cerebral Amyloid-β Aggregation With Cognitive Functioning in Persons Without Dementia.

    Willemijn J Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Betty M Tijms;Anne M Fagan

  • CSF biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: A large-scale international multicenter study

    Michael Ewers;Niklas Mattsson;Niklas Mattsson;Lennart Minthon;Lennart Minthon;José L. Molinuevo

  • Angiogenesis and brain oedema in intracranial meningiomas: influence of vascular endothelial growth factor.

    M. Bitzer;H. Opitz;J. Popp;M. Morgalla

  • Predisposing and precipitating factors of delirium after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

    Ulf Guenther;Nils Theuerkauf;Ingo Frommann;Kathrin Brimmers

  • S-Adenosylmethionine is decreased in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's disease

    Michael Linnebank;Julius Popp;Yvo Smulders;Desiree Smith

  • A metabolite-based machine learning approach to diagnose Alzheimer-type dementia in blood: Results from the European Medical Information Framework for Alzheimer disease biomarker discovery cohort

    Daniel Stamate;Daniel Stamate;Min Kim;Petroula Proitsi;Sarah Westwood

  • Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration, synaptic integrity, and astroglial activation across the clinical Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

    Isabelle Bos;Stéphanie J. B. Vos;Frans R. J. Verhey;Philip Scheltens

Frequent Co-Authors

Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Lars Bertram
Lars Bertram University of Lübeck
Sebastiaan Engelborghs
Sebastiaan Engelborghs Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Simon Lovestone
Simon Lovestone University of Oxford
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Giovanni B. Frisoni
Giovanni B. Frisoni University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Julius Popp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles