World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan C. Mattingly

Jonathan C. Mattingly

Jonathan C. Mattingly publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan C. Mattingly sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jonathan C. Mattingly D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan C. Mattingly sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society For contributions to the analysis of stochastic systems.
  • 2005 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Jonathan C. Mattingly is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and primarily works in the field of Mathematics. Their research spans various subfields including Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Finance, Statistics and Probability, and Molecular Biology. The main topics covered in their work include stochastic processes and financial applications, Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods, stochastic processes and statistical mechanics, fluid dynamics and turbulent flows, theoretical and computational physics, mathematical dynamics and fractals, and electoral systems and political participation.

Recent publications by Jonathan C. Mattingly demonstrate an emphasis on mathematical approaches to social and physical systems. Notable papers include:

  • "Quantifying Gerrymandering in North Carolina" (2020, Statistics and Public Policy)
  • "Metropolized Multiscale Forest Recombination for Redistricting" (2021, Multiscale Modeling and Simulation)
  • "Metropolized Forest Recombination for Monte Carlo Sampling of Graph Partitions" (2023, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics)
  • "Multi-Scale Merge-Split Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Redistricting" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "Optimal Legislative County Clustering in North Carolina" (2020, Statistics and Public Policy)

Jonathan C. Mattingly frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Statistics and Public Policy, Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, and the SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Gregory Herschlag
  • Andréa Agazzi
  • Ezra Miller
  • Zach Hunter
  • David P. Herzog

Throughout their career, Mattingly has been recognized with awards such as Fellow of the American Mathematical Society in 2015, for contributions to the analysis of stochastic systems, and Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Ergodicity for SDEs and approximations: Locally Lipschitz vector fields and degenerate noise

    J.C. Mattingly;A.M. Stuart;D.J. Higham

  • Ergodicity of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing

    Martin Hairer;Jonathan C. Mattingly

  • Yet Another Look at Harris’ Ergodic Theorem for Markov Chains

    Martin Hairer;Jonathan C. Mattingly

  • Asymptotic coupling and a general form of Harris’ theorem with applications to stochastic delay equations

    Martin Hairer;Martin Hairer;Jonathan Christopher Mattingly;Michael Scheutzow

  • Low-dimensional models of coherent structures in turbulence

    Philip J. Holmes;John L. Lumley;Gal Berkooz;Gal Berkooz;Jonathan C. Mattingly

  • Gibbsian Dynamics and Ergodicity¶for the Stochastically Forced Navier–Stokes Equation

    Weinan E;J. C. Mattingly;Yakov G. Sinai

  • Spectral gaps in Wasserstein distances and the 2D stochastic Navier–Stokes equations

    Martin Hairer;Jonathan Christopher Mattingly

  • Exponential Convergence for the Stochastically Forced Navier-Stokes Equations and Other Partially Dissipative Dynamics

    Jonathan C. Mattingly

  • Ergodicity for the Navier-Stokes Equation with Degenerate Random Forcing: Finite-Dimensional Approximation

    E Weinan;E Weinan;Jonathan Christopher Mattingly

  • Convergence of Numerical Time-Averaging and Stationary Measures via Poisson Equations

    Jonathan C. Mattingly;Andrew M. Stuart;M. V. Tretyakov

  • A Theory of Hypoellipticity and Unique Ergodicity for Semilinear Stochastic PDEs

    Martin Hairer;Jonathan C Mattingly

  • AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR THE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS

    J. C. Mattingly;Ya. G. Sinai

  • Ergodicity of 2D Navier–Stokes Equations with¶Random Forcing and Large Viscosity

    Jonathan C. Mattingly

  • Diffusion limits of the random walk metropolis algorithm in high dimensions

    Jonathan C. Mattingly;Natesh S. Pillai;Andrew M. Stuart

  • Malliavin calculus for the stochastic 2D Navier Stokes equation

    Jonathan C. Mattingly;Étienne Pardoux

  • An adaptive Euler–Maruyama scheme for SDEs: convergence and stability

    H. Lamba;J. C. Mattingly;A. M. Stuart

  • The strong Feller property for singular stochastic PDEs

    M Hairer;Jonathan Christopher Mattingly

  • Sticky central limit theorems on open books

    Thomas Hotz;Stephan Huckemann;Huiling Le;J. S. Marron

  • Sticky central limit theorems on open books

    Thomas Hotz;Sean Skwerer;Stephan Huckemann;Huiling Le

  • Asymptotic coupling and a weak form of Harris' theorem with applications to stochastic delay equations

    Martin Hairer;Jonathan C. Mattingly;Michael Scheutzow

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Hairer
Martin Hairer Imperial College London
Andrew M. Stuart
Andrew M. Stuart California Institute of Technology
Sayan Mukherjee
Sayan Mukherjee Duke University
Etienne Pardoux
Etienne Pardoux Aix-Marseille University
John Harer
John Harer Duke University
Eric Vanden-Eijnden
Eric Vanden-Eijnden Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Alan Frieze
Alan Frieze Carnegie Mellon University
David B. Dunson
David B. Dunson Duke University
Weinan E
Weinan E Princeton University
H. Frederik Nijhout
H. Frederik Nijhout Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens diverse pathways, including advanced degrees that complement analytical skills. For instance, pursuing a master’s in data-driven fields is a natural progression. Many students explore the best masters in data analytics programs to enhance their expertise in interpreting complex datasets, a skill highly valued across industries.

For those interested in combining quantitative skills with leadership, an MBA can be a strategic choice. Notably, the easiest mba programs offer a more accessible pathway to business knowledge, without compromising value. These programs often emphasize practical skills and flexibility, ideal for math graduates expanding their career options.

Additionally, some may prefer flexible learning formats. The easy online mba programs provide the convenience of remote study while delivering quality education. This approach allows learners to balance work, study, and personal commitments effectively.

For professionals aiming for executive roles, pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration is a worthwhile consideration. The cheapest dba online options make advanced research and leadership training more attainable, preparing graduates for top positions in academia or corporate sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan C. Mattingly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles