World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9909 9275 436 422 93 4763

Joke H.M. Tulen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joke H.M. Tulen between 1986 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joke H.M. Tulen published across 38 years, from 1986 to 2023, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2012. 4 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2012. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication
1986 2023

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joke H.M. Tulen: publications per year, 1986 to 2023
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 8
1992 3
1993 3
1994 4
1995 1
1996 6
1997 5
1998 9
1999 5
2000 5
2001 3
2002 7
2003 4
2004 9
2005 3
2006 2
2007 4
2008 8
2009 7
2010 7
2011 6
2012 10
2013 4
2014 4
2015 3
2016 6
2017 2
2018 2
2019 6
2020 2
2021 4
2022 3
2023 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Joke H.M. Tulen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joke H.M. Tulen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joke H.M. Tulen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joke H.M. Tulen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joke H.M. Tulen is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research expertise spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Psychology, with a particularly strong focus on Neurology, Social Psychology, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, emphasizing transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, meningioma and schwannoma management, neurofibromatosis and schwannoma cases, vascular malformations diagnosis and treatment, motor control and adaptation, neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, as well as evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Recent publications highlight contributions across several journals and years. These include:

  • No effect of anodal tDCS on motor cortical excitability and no evidence for responders in a large double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 2020, Brain Stimulation
  • Urbanicity, biological stress system functioning and mental health in adolescents, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Cortical Inhibition and Plasticity in Major Depressive Disorder, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Motor cortical excitability and plasticity in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1, 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Attention and Motor Learning in Adult Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1, 2021, Journal of Attention Disorders

The most frequent publication venues for this scientist include Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Stimulation, PLoS ONE, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Joke H.M. Tulen collaborates frequently with other researchers. Notable co-authors include Steven A. Kushner, Jesminne Castricum, Ype Elgersma, Walter Taal, and Zeb D. Jonker.

Best Publications

  • Disagreement between subjective and actigraphic measures of sleep duration in a population-based study of elderly persons

    Julia F. Van Den Berg;Frank J.A. Van Rooij;Henk Vos;Joke H.M. Tulen

  • Sex Differences in Subjective and Actigraphic Sleep Measures: A Population- Based Study of Elderly Persons

    Julia F. van den Berg;Henk M.E. Miedema;Joke H.M. Tulen;Albert Hofman

  • Actigraphic sleep duration and fragmentation are related to obesity in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study

    J F van den Berg;A Knvistingh Neven;J H M Tulen;A Hofman

  • Fatigue in primary Sjögren's syndrome

    P.J. Barendregt;M.R.M. Visser;E.M.A. Smets;J.H.M. Tulen

  • Characterization of stress reactions to the Stroop Color Word Test.

    J.H.M. Tulen;P. Moleman;H.G. van Steenis;F. Boomsma

  • Alterations in HPA-axis and autonomic nervous system functioning in childhood anxiety disorders point to a chronic stress hypothesis

    Gwendolyn C. Dieleman;Anja C. Huizink;Joke H.M. Tulen;Elisabeth M.W.J. Utens

  • Quantification of physical activities by means of ambulatory accelerometry: a validation study.

    Johannes B.J. Bussmann;Joke H.M. Tulen;Eva C.G. Van Herel;Henk J. Stam

  • Sleep Duration and Hypertension Are Not Associated in the Elderly

    Julia F. van den Berg;Joke H.M. Tulen;Arie Knuistingh Neven;Albert Hofman

  • Motor activity and autonomic cardiac functioning in major depressive disorder.

    Anita C Volkers;Joke H.M Tulen;Walter W van den Broek;Jan A Bruijn

  • CPT performance in major depressive disorder before and after treatment with imipramine or fluvoxamine

    Gerard C Koetsier;Anita C Volkers;Joke H.M Tulen;Jan Passchier

  • Associations between HPA axis functioning and level of anxiety in children and adolescents with an anxiety disorder.

    V.L. Kallen;J.H.M. Tulen;E.M.W.J. Utens;P.D.A. Treffers

  • Cardiovascular variability in major depressive disorder and effects of imipramine or mirtazapine (Org 3770).

    J. H. M. Tulen;J. A. Bruijn;K. J. De Man;L. Pepplinkhuizen

  • Determinants of Physiological and Perceived Physiological Stress Reactivity in Children and Adolescents

    Brittany E. Evans;Brittany E. Evans;Kirstin Greaves-Lord;Anja S. Euser;Anja S. Euser;Joke H. M. Tulen

  • Physiological responsivity to emotional pictures in schizophrenia

    Roelie J. Hempel;Joke H.M. Tulen;Nico J.M. van Beveren;Hugo G. van Steenis

  • Long sleep duration is associated with serum cholesterol in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study.

    Julia F. van den Berg;Henk M. E. Miedema;Joke H. M. Tulen;Arie Knuistingh Neven

  • Sleep in depression and anxiety disorders: A population-based study of elderly persons

    Julia F. van den Berg;Hendrika J. Luijendijk;Joke H. M. Tulen;Albert Hofman

  • Autonomic reactivity in clinically referred children attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder versus anxiety disorder

    Natasja D.J. van Lang;Joke H.M. Tulen;Victor L. Kallen;Bianca Rosbergen

  • Reduced autonomic flexibility as a predictor for future anxiety in girls from the general population: The TRAILS study

    Kirstin Greaves-Lord;Joke H. M. Tulen;Andrea Dietrich;Frouke Sondeijker

  • Threat-Related Selective Attention Predicts Treatment Success in Childhood Anxiety Disorders

    Jeroen S. Legerstee;Joke H.M. Tulen;Victor L. Kallen;Gwen C. Dieleman

  • CBT for childhood anxiety disorders: differential changes in selective attention between treatment responders and non-responders.

    Jeroen S. Legerstee;Joke H.M. Tulen;Bram Dierckx;Philip D.A. Treffers

  • Anxiety and autonomic regulation in major depressive disorder: an exploratory study

    J. H. M. Tulen;J. A. Bruijn;K. J. De Man;E. Van Der Velden

  • Personality traits and psychological reactions to mental stress of female migraine patients.

    Dirk Stronks;Joke Tulen;Lolke Pepplinkhuizen;Robert Verheij

  • The effect of antipsychotic medication on facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: A review

    Roelie J. Hempel;Judith Anna Dekker;Nico J.M. van Beveren;Joke H.M. Tulen

Frequent Co-Authors

Anja C. Huizink
Anja C. Huizink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henning Tiemeier
Henning Tiemeier Harvard University
Jan Passchier
Jan Passchier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Ingmar H.A. Franken
Ingmar H.A. Franken Erasmus University Rotterdam
Frank C. Verhulst
Frank C. Verhulst Erasmus University Rotterdam
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe
Vincent W. V. Jaddoe Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ype Elgersma
Ype Elgersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan van der Ende
Jan van der Ende Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your psychology education online can open doors to diverse career opportunities. One popular pathway is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP). This profession plays a vital role in evaluating and treating communication disorders across all ages. If you're considering this field, it's important to know that certification requirements can vary significantly between states.

For example, Illinois slp certification requirements include completing a relevant master's degree, passing a national Praxis exam, and fulfilling state-specific licensure steps. Meanwhile, those interested in practicing in Indiana must follow Indiana slp certification requirements, which emphasize supervised clinical experience in addition to academic credentials.

If your career goals are set in Iowa, you'll need to meet the Iowa speech pathologist certification requirements, which include passing a relevant exam and an internship. Kansas has its own process, outlined in the slp requirements in Kansas.

Studying psychology online can also prepare you for additional roles in mental health, counseling, education, and research. Consider your interests and explore state regulations before choosing an online degree or career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Joke H.M. Tulen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles