World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
11684
World Ranking
10961
National Ranking
783

Johannes Wienberg publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Wienberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 141 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Johannes Wienberg D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Wienberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Wienberg is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, focusing more specifically on subfields such as Cell Biology and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their scientific work include:

  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease

Wienberg has contributed to the scientific literature with publications in notable venues such as The EMBO Journal and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Their recent papers are:

  • "GOLPH3 and GOLPH3L maintain Golgi localization of LYSET and a functional mannose 6-phosphate transport pathway" (2024, The EMBO Journal)
  • "Equipositioning of Chromosomes in the Polyploid Archaeon Haloferax volcanii by HpaAB" (2025, bioRxiv [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory])

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Brooke L. Brauer
  • Zilei Chen
  • Felix Beirow
  • Jiaran Li
  • Daniel Meisinger

Best Publications

  • Multicolor Spectral Karyotyping of Human Chromosomes

    E. Schröck;S. du Manoir;T. Veldman;B. Schoell

  • The Promise of Comparative Genomics in Mammals

    Stephen J. O'Brien;Marilyn Menotti-Raymond;William J. Murphy;William G. Nash

  • Multicolour spectral karyotyping of mouse chromosomes.

    M Liyanage;A Coleman;S du Manoir;T Veldman

  • Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting.

    Anna Jauch;Johannes Wienberg;Roscoe Stanyon;N. Arnold

  • Male mouse recombination maps for each autosome identified by chromosome painting.

    Lutz Froenicke;Lorinda K. Anderson;Johannes Wienberg;Terry Ashley

  • Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

    Felix A. Habermann;Marion Cremer;Joachim Walter;Gregor Kreth

  • Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization

    Johannes Wienberg;Anna Jauch;Roscoe Stanyon;Thomas Cremer

  • Homologies in human and Macaca fuscata chromosomes revealed by in situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries.

    Johannes Wienberg;Roscoe Stanyon;Anna Jauch;Thomas Cremer

  • Chromosomal phylogeny and evolution of gibbons (Hylobatidae)

    Stefan Müller;Melanie Hollatz;Johannes Wienberg

  • Chinese hamster genome sequenced from sorted chromosomes.

    Karina Brinkrolf;Oliver Rupp;Holger Laux;Florian Kollin

  • Comparative genomics: lessons from cats

    Stephen J. O'Brien;Johannes Wienberg;Leslie A. Lyons

  • Defining the ancestral karyotype of all primates by multidirectional chromosome painting between tree shrews, lemurs and humans.

    S. Müller;R. Stanyon;P. C. M. O’Brien;M. A. Ferguson-Smith

  • Cross-species colour segmenting: a novel tool in human karyotype analysis.

    S. Müller;P. C. M. O'Brien;M. A. Ferguson‐Smith;J. Wienberg

  • The atomic force microscope as a new microdissecting tool for the generation of genetic probes.

    S. Thalhammer;R.W. Stark;S. Müller;J. Wienberg

  • Comparative painting of mammalian chromosomes

    Johannes Wienberg;Roscoe Stanyon

  • Conservation of human vs. feline genome organization revealed by reciprocal chromosome painting.

    J. Wienberg;R. Stanyon;W.G. Nash;P.C.M. O’Brien

  • Toward a multicolor chromosome bar code for the entire human karyotype by fluorescence in situ hybridization

    S. Müller;M. Rocchi;M. A. Ferguson-Smith;J. Wienberg

  • Presence and abundance of CENP-B box sequences in great ape subsets of primate-specific alpha-satellite DNA.

    Thomas Haaf;A. Gregory Mater;Johannes Wienberg;David C. Ward

  • A reappraisal of the tandem fusion theory of karyotype evolution in Indian muntjac using chromosome painting.

    F. Yang;P. C. M. O'Brien;J. Wienberg;M. A. Ferguson-Smith

  • Comparative Genome Organization of Vertebrates

    L. Andersson;A. Archibald;M. Ashburner;S. Audun

Frequent Co-Authors

Roscoe Stanyon
Roscoe Stanyon University of Florence
Thomas Cremer
Thomas Cremer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
J. S. Heslop-Harrison
J. S. Heslop-Harrison University of Leicester
Axel Walch
Axel Walch Technical University of Munich
David C. Ward
David C. Ward Nevada Cancer Research Foundation
Ulrich H. Weidle
Ulrich H. Weidle Roche (United States)
Leslie A. Lyons
Leslie A. Lyons University of Missouri
Bernhard Horsthemke
Bernhard Horsthemke University of Duisburg-Essen
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith University of Cambridge
Stephen J. O'Brien
Stephen J. O'Brien Nova Southeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens a variety of doors in the health and life sciences sectors. Many students consider expanding their expertise with further credentials such as cpc certification, which is vital for those interested in medical coding careers. These certifications can enhance job prospects and boost earning potential.

If you’re considering this career path, it’s natural to wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder. Training periods can range from a few months to two years, depending on your chosen program and whether you study online or in person. Flexible online courses allow you to balance learning with your other commitments.

There is growing awareness of the role of medical billing and coding specialists. For those asking, is medical billing and coding in demand, the answer is yes—employment in this sector continues to rise thanks to expanding healthcare needs.

To get started, you might explore health information management schools online, which offer affordable, accredited degree pathways in this fast-growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Wienberg

Trending Scientists