World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
19230
World Ranking
9470
National Ranking
169

Joan Daemen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Daemen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 168 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joan Daemen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joan Daemen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joan Daemen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands, specializing in computer science with a focus on cryptographic implementations and security. Their research spans multiple topics and subfields including artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, hardware and architecture, signal processing, and computational theory and mathematics.

The primary areas of study that characterize Joan Daemen's work include:

  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Coding Theory and Cryptography
  • Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Cryptography and Data Security

Joan Daemen has contributed to numerous publications, particularly in the venue of the IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology, where eight of their papers have appeared. Other frequent publication venues include IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), Designs Codes and Cryptography, and Cryptography and Communications.

Recent notable papers include:

  • "Xoodyak, a lightweight cryptographic scheme", 2020, published in IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • "The Subterranean 2.0 Cipher Suite", 2020, published in IACR Transactions on Symmetric Cryptology
  • "Protecting against Statistical Ineffective Fault Attacks", 2020, published in IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems
  • "Protecting against Statistical Ineffective Fault Attacks", 2020, published by Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "Xoodyak, a lightweight cryptographic scheme", 2020, published in DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)

Joan Daemen has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Among the most frequent co-authors are:

  • Vincent Rijmen
  • Silvia Mella
  • Alireza Mehrdad
  • Gilles Van Assche
  • Lejla Batina

Their contributions to literature also extend to books, with publications through Springer Nature and Springer Science+Business Media. Notable titles include:

  • The Design of Rijndael, 2020, published by Springer Nature
  • Progress in Cryptology - AFRICACRYPT 2022, 2022, published by Springer Science+Business Media

Best Publications

  • The Design of Rijndael

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • The Design of Rijndael: AES - The Advanced Encryption Standard

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • The Block Cipher Square

    Joan Daemen;Lars R. Knudsen;Vincent Rijmen

  • The block cipher rijndael

    J Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • On the indifferentiability of the sponge construction

    Guido Bertoni;Joan Daemen;Michaël Peeters;Gilles Van Assche

  • Duplexing the sponge: single-pass authenticated encryption and other applications.

    Guido Bertoni;Joan Daemen;Michaël Peeters;Gilles Van Assche

  • Keccak sponge function family main document

    Guido Bertoni;Joan Daemen;Gilles Van Assche

  • The Cipher SHARK

    Vincent Rijmen;Joan Daemen;Bart Preneel;Anton Bossalaers

  • Keccak

    Unknown

  • Rijndael, the advanced encryption standard

    J Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • The Wide Trail Design Strategy

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • Weak keys for IDEA

    Joan Daemen;René Govaerts;Joos Vandewalle

  • The Advanced Encryption Standard Process

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • Probability Distributions of Correlation and Differentials in Block Ciphers

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • Limitations of the Even-Mansour Construction

    Joan Daemen

  • Sponge-based pseudo-random number generators

    Guido Bertoni;Joan Daemen;Michaël Peeters;Gilles Van Assche

  • The Design of Rijndael: The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • Fast Hashing and Stream Encryption with PANAMA

    Joan Daemen;Craig S. K. Clapp

  • Security of Keyed Sponge Constructions Using a Modular Proof Approach

    Elena Andreeva;Joan Daemen;Bart Mennink;Gilles Van Assche

  • A new MAC construction alred and a specific instance ALPHA-MAC

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • Rijndael for AES.

    Joan Daemen;Vincent Rijmen

  • The design of Xoodoo and Xoofff

    Joan Daemen;Seth Hoffert;Gilles Van Assche;Ronny Van Keer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lejla Batina
Lejla Batina Radboud University
Lars R. Knudsen
Lars R. Knudsen University of Southern Denmark
Bart Preneel
Bart Preneel KU Leuven
Francesco Regazzoni
Francesco Regazzoni Polytechnic University of Milan
Alex Biryukov
Alex Biryukov University of Luxembourg
Florian Mendel
Florian Mendel Infineon Technologies (Germany)
Serge Vaudenay
Serge Vaudenay École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and career paths. For those interested in sustainability and the environment, pursuing an environmental engineer degree online can be a strategic choice, blending computer science skills with environmental problem-solving.

If you’re fascinated by machinery, an online mechanical engineering degree offers promising career prospects in robotics and automation. Many students look for the best mechanical engineering degree online cost options to help manage tuition and other expenses.

For those drawn to scientific concepts and theory, physics remains a foundational discipline closely tied to computer science. It’s possible to find the cheapest online physics degree programs that provide flexibility while deepening analytical and quantitative reasoning.

Additionally, as data-driven decision making shapes many industries, following a data science learning path can help you build in-demand technical and analytical skills, preparing you for fast-growing technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Joan Daemen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles