World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
37
Citations
4596
World Ranking
2544
National Ranking
5

Franc Forstneric publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franc Forstneric sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 197 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Franc Forstneric D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franc Forstneric sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Franc Forstnerič is affiliated with the University of Ljubljana in Slovenia and specializes in the field of Mathematics. Their research focus spans multiple subfields, primarily Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, and Mathematical Physics, along with contributions to Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computational Mechanics.

They have published extensively, with a total of 169 works in Mathematics. The main research topics covered include geometric analysis and curvature flows, holomorphic and operator theory, geometry and complex manifolds, geometric and algebraic topology, analytic and geometric function theory, meromorphic and entire functions, and algebraic geometry and number theory.

Forstnerič's frequent collaborators include Antonio Alarcón, Francisco J. López, Barbara Drinovec Drnovšek, Finnur Lárusson, and Erlend Fornæss Wold.

Their recent papers illustrate active engagement with advanced mathematical topics. Examples include:

  • Recent developments on Oka manifolds, 2023, Indagationes Mathematicae
  • Schwarz-Pick lemma for harmonic maps which are conformal at a point, 2024, Analysis & PDE
  • The Calabi-Yau Property of Superminimal Surfaces in Self-Dual Einstein Four-Manifolds, 2020, Journal of Geometric Analysis
  • Holomorphic families of Fatou-Bieberbach domains and applications to Oka manifolds, 2020, Mathematical Research Letters

Forstnerič has contributed to publications in well-known venues, including arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Geometric Analysis, Analysis & PDE, Mathematische Zeitschrift, and Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.

In addition to articles, they have authored book publications with Springer Science+Business Media. One notable title is Minimal Surfaces from a Complex Analytic Viewpoint, published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Stein Manifolds and Holomorphic Mappings

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Extending proper holomorphic mappings of positive codimension

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Stein Manifolds and Holomorphic Mappings: The Homotopy Principle in Complex Analysis

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Approximation of biholomorphic mappings by automorphisms of C n

    Franc Forstnerič;Jean-Pierre Rosay

  • Localization of the Kobayashi Metric and the Boundary Continuity of Proper Holomorphic Mappings

    Franc Forstneric;Jean-Pierre Rosay

  • Approximation of biholomorphic mappings by automorphisms of Cn

    Unknown

  • Survey of Oka theory.

    Franc Forstnerič;Finnur Lárusson

  • Noncritical holomorphic functions on Stein manifolds

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Analytic disks with boundaries in a maximal real submanifold of ${f C}^2$

    Franc Forstneric

  • Interpolation by holomorphic automorphisms and embeddings in Cn

    Franc Forstneric

  • Holomorphic curves in complex spaces

    Barbara Drinovec Drnovšek;Franc Forstnerič

  • Null curves and directed immersions of open Riemann surfaces

    Antonio Alarcón;Franc Forstnerič

  • Oka's principle for holomorphic submersions with sprays

    Franc Forstnerič;Jasna Prezelj

  • Complex tangents of real surfaces in complex surfaces

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Embedding strictly pseudoconvex domains into balls

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Actions of (R,+) and (C,+) on complex manifolds

    Franc Forstneric

  • Extending holomorphic sections from complex subvarieties

    Franc Forstnerič;Jasna Prezelj

  • A new class of polynomially convex sets

    F. Forstnerič;E. L. Stout

  • Bordered Riemann surfaces in C^2

    Franc Forstneric;Erlend Fornaess Wold

  • The Oka principle for sections of subelliptic submersions

    F. Forstneric

  • Manifolds of holomorphic mappings from strongly pseudoconvex domains

    Franc Forstnerič

  • Discs in pseudoconvex domains.

    Franc Forstnerič;Josip Globevnik

  • The homotopy principle in complex analysis: a survey

    Franc Forstneric

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals leverage their analytical skills to pursue advanced business degrees that complement their quantitative expertise.

If you’re considering a leadership or management role, researching the easiest mba programs might be a helpful way to balance rigorous study with your current commitments. These programs focus on accessibility without compromising essential business knowledge.

Among them, some of the easiest online mba programs stand out for their flexible formats and user-friendly curricula, perfect for math students aiming to broaden their expertise while managing a busy schedule.

If affordability is a priority, exploring the cheapest aacsb online dba options can provide accreditation and value without excessive financial strain. Similarly, the cheapest online master's in finance degrees are excellent for math graduates interested in finance careers, delivering rigorous training at a reasonable cost.

By considering these related degrees, math students can enhance their career prospects, moving into roles that value both numerical and strategic skills.

Best Scientists Citing Franc Forstneric

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles