World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
6349
World Ranking
2336
National Ranking
14

John Erik Fornæss publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Erik Fornæss sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 232 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

John Erik Fornæss D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Erik Fornæss sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society For contributions to several complex variables and to complex dynamics.
  • 1978 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Mathematics
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Mathematics
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Mathematics
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters Mathematics

Overview

John Erik Fornæss is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research primarily falls within the field of Mathematics, with a significant focus on Applied Mathematics and Geometry and Topology. Their scholarly output includes 57 publications in Mathematics, among which subfields such as Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics are represented.

The scientist's work covers several core research topics, notably:

  • Holomorphic and Operator Theory
  • Geometry and complex manifolds
  • Meromorphic and Entire Functions
  • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
  • Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
  • Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations

Recent publications authored by John Erik Fornæss include:

  • "On the boundary rigidity at strongly pseudoconvex points" (2020) published in Mathematische Zeitschrift
  • "The boundary rigidity for holomorphic self-maps of some fibered domains" (2021) published in Mathematical Research Letters
  • "Dynamics of transcendental Hénon maps III: Infinite entropy" (2021) published in Journal of Modern Dynamics (co-authored by Leandro Arosio)
  • "Weighted L2 Version of Mergelyan and Carleman Approximation" (2020) published in Journal of Geometric Analysis (co-authored by Séverine Biard)
  • "Dynamics of transcendental Hénon maps-II" (2022) published in Mathematische Annalen (co-authored by Leandro Arosio)

Frequent publication venues for Fornæss include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mathematische Annalen
  • Journal of Geometric Analysis
  • Journal of Modern Dynamics
  • Mathematische Zeitschrift

Collaborations feature a number of frequent co-authors, highlighting a network of researchers:

  • Mi Hu
  • Ratna Pal
  • Tuyen Trung Truong
  • Leandro Arosio
  • Anna Miriam Benini

John Erik Fornæss's professional recognition includes the following awards and honors:

  • Fellow of the American Mathematical Society (2016) for contributions to several complex variables and to complex dynamics
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1978)
  • Member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters in Mathematics

Best Publications

  • Pseudoconvex domains: Bounded strictly plurisubharmonic exhaustion functions

    Klas Diederich;John Erik Fornæss

  • Complex dynamics in higher dimensions

    John Erik Fornæss;Nessim Sibony

  • Pseudoconvex Domains with Real-Analytic Boundary

    Klas Diederich;John E. Fornaess

  • Pseudoconvex Domains: An Example with Nontrivial Nebenhülle.

    Klas Diederich;John Erik Fornaess

  • The Levi problem on complex spaces with singularities

    John Erik Fornaess;Raghavan Narasimhan

  • Embedding Strictly Pseudoconvex Domains in Convex Domains

    John Erik Fornaess

  • Oka's inequality for currents and applications

    John Erik Fornæss;Nessim Sibony

  • Proper holomorphic mappings between real-analytic pseudoconvex domains inC n

    K. Diederich;J. E. Fornæss

  • Complex Hénon mappings in ℂ2 and Fatou-Bieberbach domains

    John Erik Fornæss;Nessim Sibony

  • A Construction of Peak Functions on Weakly Pseudoconvex Domains

    Eric Bedford;John Erik Fornaess

  • Proper holomorphic maps onto pseudoconvex domains with real-analytic boundary

    Klas Diederich;John E. Fornaess

  • Random iterations of rational functions

    John Erik Fornaess;Nessim Sibony

  • Construction of P.S.H. functions on weakly pseudoconvex domains

    John Erik Fornaess;Nessim Sibony

  • Lectures on Counterexamples in Several Complex Variables

    John Erik Fornæss;Berit Stensønes

  • Exposing Points on the Boundary of a Strictly Pseudoconvex or a Locally Convexifiable Domain of Finite 1-Type

    K. Diederich;J. E. Fornæss;E. F. Wold

  • Hölder estimates on convex domains of finite type

    Unknown

  • Pseudoconvex domains: existence of Stein neighborhoods

    Klas Diederich;John Erik Fornaess

  • Support functions for convex domains of finite type

    Klas Diederich;John Erik Fornæss

  • Smoothingq-convex functions and vanishing theorems

    Klas Diederich;John Erik Fornaess

  • Harmonic currents of finite energy and laminations

    John Erik Fornæss;Nessim Sibony

  • Riemann Surface Laminations with Singularities

    John Erik Fornæss;Nessim Sibony

Frequent Co-Authors

Nessim Sibony
Nessim Sibony University of Paris-Saclay
Eric Bedford
Eric Bedford Stony Brook University
Steven G. Krantz
Steven G. Krantz Washington University in St. Louis
Larry L. Schumaker
Larry L. Schumaker Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs such as a masters data analytics are increasingly popular. They build on mathematical foundations to prepare students for roles in data interpretation, business intelligence, and decision-making across industries.

If you’re interested in combining math skills with business acumen, pursuing an MBA is a valuable option. Many students look for the easiest mba to get into, which can help streamline admission and reduce application complexities. This approach makes it simpler for math graduates to transition into management roles.

For professionals seeking flexibility, the easiest mba online options provide accessible pathways to earn business qualifications without compromising work or personal commitments. These programs often leverage strong analytical coursework aligned with business strategy.

Finally, those aiming for advanced leadership roles might consider dba online programs. Doctorate degrees in business administration emphasize research and practical problem-solving, building on the quantitative and critical thinking skills honed through mathematics studies.

Best Scientists Citing John Erik Fornæss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles