World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 89 1083 1024 152 146 144 147426
Molecular Biology 89 743 662 60 53 144 147426

Jane Rogers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jane Rogers between 1998 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jane Rogers published across 26 years, from 1998 to 2023, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2023. 36 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2023. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 34 publications
1998 2023

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jane Rogers: publications per year, 1998 to 2023
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 5
2000 3
2001 7
2002 5
2003 11
2004 11
2005 13
2006 19
2007 15
2008 14
2009 9
2010 4
2011 5
2012 4
2013 7
2014 5
2015 1
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 1
2020 2
2021 2
2022 2
2023 34
Total 190
Download as CSV

Jane Rogers publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 144 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158 144
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Jane Rogers D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Rogers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50 89
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jane Rogers is affiliated with the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several areas within Medicine and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on subfields that include Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, as well as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their published works cover a range of topics such as Chromosomal and Genetic Variations, Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics, Maternal and Fetal Healthcare, Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, and RNA and Protein Synthesis Mechanisms.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Jane Rogers include:

  • Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution, 2021, Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
  • Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring genome assembly, 2021, The Plant Journal
  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres, 2022, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
  • Postpartum haemorrhage occurring in UK midwifery units: A national population-based case-control study to investigate incidence, risk factors and outcomes, 2023, PLoS ONE
  • Outcomes for women admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK following a postpartum haemorrhage in a previous pregnancy: A national population-based cohort and nested case-control study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS), 2022, Women and Birth

Frequent co-authors working alongside Jane Rogers include Jennifer J. Kurinczuk, Rachel Rowe, LaDeana W. Hillier, Webb Miller, and Ewan Birney. Their collaboration spans different aspects of their shared research interests.

Jane Rogers' research outputs have appeared in several publication venues, reflecting a spectrum of scientific disciplines and focus areas. These venues include:

  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
  • The Plant Journal
  • Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Women and Birth

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence

    S. T. Cole;R. Brosch;J. Parkhill;T. Garnier

  • Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome.

    Robert H. Waterston;Kerstin Lindblad-Toh;Ewan Birney;Jane Rogers

  • Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome

    Christopher Ponting;Daniel Barker

  • The International HapMap Project

    John W. Belmont;Paul Hardenbol;Thomas D. Willis;Fuli Yu

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • A haplotype map of the human genome

    John W. Belmont;Andrew Boudreau;Suzanne M. Leal;Paul Hardenbol

  • A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs

    Kelly A. Frazer;Dennis G. Ballinger;David R. Cox;David A. Hinds

  • The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.

    Kerstin Howe;Matthew D. Clark;Carlos F. Torroja;Carlos F. Torroja;James Torrance

  • Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry

    David R. Bentley;Shankar Balasubramanian;Harold P. Swerdlow;Harold P. Swerdlow;Geoffrey P. Smith

  • A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms

    Ravi Sachidanandam;David Weissman;Steven C. Schmidt;Jerzy M. Kakol

  • The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution

    Shusei Sato;Satoshi Tabata;Hideki Hirakawa;Erika Asamizu

  • Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome

    Rudi Appels;Rudi Appels;Kellye Eversole;Nils Stein;Nils Stein

  • Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease

    H Ueda;Howson Jmm.;L Esposito;J Heward

  • Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution

    Ladeana W. Hillier;Webb Miller;Ewan Birney;Wesley Warren

  • Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations

    Pardis C. Sabeti;Pardis C. Sabeti;Patrick Varilly;Patrick Varilly;Ben Fry;Jason Lohmueller

  • Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs

    Y. Okazaki;M. Furuno;T. Kasukawa;J. Adachi

  • A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome

    Klaus F. X. Mayer;Jane Rogers;Jaroslav Doležel

  • DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22

    Florian Eckhardt;Joern Lewin;Rene Cortese;Vardhman K Rakyan

  • Complete sequence and gene map of a human major histocompatibility complex

    S Beck;D Geraghty;H Inoko;L Rowen

Frequent Co-Authors

Sean Humphray
Sean Humphray Illumina (United States)
Ian Dunham
Ian Dunham European Bioinformatics Institute
Tim Hubbard
Tim Hubbard King's College London
Stephan Beck
Stephan Beck University College London
James C. Mullikin
James C. Mullikin National Institutes of Health
Pieter J. de Jong
Pieter J. de Jong UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital
Sarah Hunt
Sarah Hunt European Bioinformatics Institute
Simon G. Gregory
Simon G. Gregory Duke University
Richard K. Wilson
Richard K. Wilson Nationwide Children's Hospital
Lucinda Fulton
Lucinda Fulton Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics in the USA opens doors to a wide range of careers beyond the lab. Many students explore related health science fields, especially through flexible online programs. For example, careers in medical coding are in high demand, and you can start by researching medical billing and coding certification cost to see if it aligns with your interests or budget.

If you’re considering direct patient care, you might look into easy nursing colleges to get into. These programs can provide alternative pathways into healthcare with varying entry requirements and timelines.

For those interested in the leadership and organizational side of healthcare, consider enrolling in a healthcare administration online degree. These programs offer the skills needed for management roles in hospitals and research organizations.

Cost is often a deciding factor, so exploring the cheapest online healthcare management degree options can help you find a program that matches your career goals without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Rogers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles