World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
22625
World Ranking
6190
National Ranking
2913

James R. Gillette publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Gillette sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 199 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

James R. Gillette D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James R. Gillette sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

James R. Gillette was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to scientific research and maintained a connection with one of the leading biomedical research institutions in the country.

No records of recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues were available from the data provided. Similarly, there is no information on book publications, main fields or subfields of study, nor specific topics of work related to their research.

Information regarding awards won or any specific years tied to notable recognitions was also unavailable. The absence of documented publications and scientific output in the data suggests either limited publicly indexed records or a focus on internal or non-published research activities during their tenure.

James R. Gillette had passed away, and this biographical profile is thus presented in the past tense to reflect that.

Best Publications

  • Bromobenzene-Induced Liver Necrosis. Protective Role of Glutathione and Evidence for 3,4-Bromobenzene Oxide as the Hepatotoxic Metabolite

    D J Jollow;J R Mitchell;N Zampaglione;J R Gillette

  • ACETAMINOPHEN-INDUCED HEPATIC NECROSIS. IV. PROTECTIVE ROLE OF GLUTATHIONE

    J R Mitchell;D J Jollow;W Z Potter;J R Gillette

  • ACETAMINOPHEN-INDUCED HEPATIC NECROSIS. I. ROLE OF DRUG METABOLISM

    J. R. Mitchell;D. J. Jollow;W. Z. Potter;D. C. Davis

  • ACETAMINOPHEN-INDUCED HEPATIC NECROSIS. II. ROLE OF COVALENT BINDING IN VIVO

    D J Jollow;J R Mitchell;W Z Potter;D C Davis

  • EFFECT OF STARVATION ON NADPH-DEPENDENT ENZYMES IN LIVER MICROSOMES OF MALE AND FEMALE RATS

    Ryuichi Kato;James R. Gillette

  • Acetaminophen-induced hepatic necrosis. 3. Cytochrome P-450-mediated covalent binding in vitro.

    W Z Potter;D C Davis;J R Mitchell;D J Jollow

  • Possible Mechanism of Liver Necrosis Caused by Aromatic Organic Compounds

    Bernard B. Brodie;Watson D. Reid;Arthur K. Cho;Glenn Sipes

  • Biochemistry of Drug Oxidation and Reduction by Enzymes in Hepatic Endoplasmic Reticulum

    James R. Gillette

  • Factors affecting drug metabolism.

    James R. Gillette

  • Biochemical Mechanisms of Drug Toxicity

    James R. Gillette;Jerry R. Mitchell;Bernard B. Brodie

  • Studies on the rate of reduction of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 by reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate: effect of drug substrates.

    Philippe L. Gigon;Theodore E. Gram;James R. Gillette

  • SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN THE METABOLISM OF IMIPRAMINE AND DESMETHYLIMIPRAMINE (DMI)

    J. V. Dingell;F. Sulser;J. R. Gillette

  • A perspective on the role of chemically reactive metabolites of foreign compounds in toxicity—I correlation of changes in covalent binding of reactivity metabolites with changes in the incidence and severity of toxicity

    James R. Gillette

  • Role of detoxifying enzymes in bromobenzene-induced liver necrosis

    N Zampaglione;D J Jollow;J R Mitchell;B Stripp

  • Bioactivation of carbon tetrachloride, chloroform and bromotrichloromethane: role of cytochrome P-450.

    I G Sipes;G Krishna;J R Gillette

  • Diverse effects of SKF 525-A and antioxidants on carbon tetrachloride-induced changes in liver microsomal P-450 content and ethylmorphine metabolism.

    Jose A. Castro;Henry A. Sasame;Howard Sussman;James R. Gillette

  • Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity.

    Jack A. Hinson;Lance R. Pohl;Terrence J. Monks;James R. Gillette

  • Studies on the mechanism of the lung toxicity of paraquat: comparison of tissue distribution and some biochemical parameters in rats and rabbits.

    Kenneth F. Ilett;Bitten Stripp;Raymond H. Menard;Watson D. Reid

  • Overview of drug-protein binding.

    James R. Gillette

  • Studies on the destruction of liver microsomal cytochrome P-450 by carbon tetrachloride administration

    Henry A. Sasame;Jose A. Castro;James R. Gillette

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack A. Hinson
Jack A. Hinson University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Lance R. Pohl
Lance R. Pohl National Institutes of Health
Bernard B. Brodie
Bernard B. Brodie National Institutes of Health
Barry R. Stripp
Barry R. Stripp Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Frank J. Gonzalez
Frank J. Gonzalez National Institutes of Health
Harry V. Gelboin
Harry V. Gelboin National Institutes of Health
William F. Trager
William F. Trager University of Washington
Folke Sjöqvist
Folke Sjöqvist Karolinska Institute
Snorri S. Thorgeirsson
Snorri S. Thorgeirsson National Institutes of Health
Victor J. Ferrans
Victor J. Ferrans National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry unlocks a wide range of advanced career options in the health and science sectors. Many students pursue specialized online degrees to boost their credentials while maintaining flexibility. If you’re seeking a role in nutrition, consider the best online registered dietitian programs to prepare for licensure and clinical careers.

For those interested in healthcare management and leadership, fully online pathways are also available. Health administration students should look for programs with CAHME accreditation for MHA programs to ensure high educational standards. If your goal is to lead in nursing practice, explore online DNP programs that offer advanced study, some even without clinical requirements.

Finally, research and executive healthcare roles often require terminal degrees such as a PhD in healthcare administration online. Each of these pathways can help Biology and Biochemistry graduates reach top positions within medicine, research, or healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing James R. Gillette

Recently Published Articles