World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
27103
World Ranking
15047
National Ranking
7606

James M. Perel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Perel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 310 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James M. Perel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Perel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Perel was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States during their academic career. Their work contributed to the broader scientific and academic community in ways that are reflected through their professional association.

No specific details regarding published papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications are recorded in the available data. Similarly, there is no recorded information on main fields of study, subfields, or topics of work associated with their research output.

There are no awards or honors documented for James M. Perel in the data provided.

Due to the absence of detailed records on publications, collaborations, or specialized research areas, only the institutional affiliation and the status of the scientist as deceased can be confirmed based on the current information.

Best Publications

  • Childhood and adolescent depression: a review of the past 10 years. Part I.

    Boris Birmaher;Neal D. Ryan;Douglas E. Williamson;David A. Brent

  • Five-Year Outcome for Maintenance Therapies in Recurrent Depression

    David J. Kupfer;Ellen F. Frank;James M. Perel;Cleon Cornes

  • Nortriptyline and Interpersonal Psychotherapy as Maintenance Therapies for Recurrent Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients Older Than 59 Years

    Charles F. Reynolds;Ellen Frank;James M. Perel;Stanley D. Imber

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life

    Arnold J. Friedhoff;James Ballenger;Alan S. Bellack;William T. Carpenter

  • Neonatal Signs After Late In Utero Exposure to Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors: Literature Review and Implications for Clinical Applications

    Eydie L. Moses-Kolko;Debra Bogen;James Perel;Amy Bregar

  • Treating Major Depression in Primary Care Practice: Eight-Month Clinical Outcomes

    H C Schulberg;M R Block;M J Madonia;C P Scott

  • Major depression and antidepressant treatment: impact on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

    Katherine L. Wisner;Dorothy K.Y. Sit;Barbara H. Hanusa;Eydie L. Moses-Kolko

  • The Influence of Chronic Exposure to Antipsychotic Medications on Brain Size before and after Tissue Fixation: A Comparison of Haloperidol and Olanzapine in Macaque Monkeys

    Karl-Anton Dorph-Petersen;Joseph N Pierri;James M Perel;Zhuoxin Sun

  • Fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Jack R. Cornelius;Ihsan M. Salloum;Joan G. Ehler;Patricia J. Jarrett

  • The pharmacological treatment of delusional depression.

    Spiker Dg;Weiss Jc;Dealy Rs;Griffin Sj

  • Clinical implications of imipramine plasma levels for depressive illness.

    Alexander H. Glassman;James M. Perel;Michael Shostak;Shepard J. Kantor

  • The corticotropin-releasing hormone challenge in depressed abused, depressed nonabused, and normal control children.

    Joan Kaufman;Boris Birmaher;James Perel;Ronald E Dahl

  • A pilot randomized controlled trial of combined trauma-focused CBT and sertraline for childhood PTSD symptoms.

    Judith A. Cohen;Anthony P. Mannarino;James M. Perel;Virginia Staron

  • Decreased cortisol levels in adolescent girls with conduct disorder.

    Kathleen Pajer;William Gardner;Robert T. Rubin;James Perel

  • How Common Is Resistance to Treatment in Recurrent, Nonpsychotic Geriatric Depression?

    John T. Little;Charles F. Reynolds;Mary Amanda Dew;Ellen Frank

  • Antidepressant Treatment During Breast-Feeding

    Katherine L. Wisner;James L. Perel;Robert L. Findling

  • Demonstration in vivo of reduced serotonin responsivity in the brain of untreated depressed patients.

    J. John Mann;Kevin M. Malone;David J. Diehl;James Perel

  • Progress in pharmacotherapy of borderline disorders. A double-blind study of amitriptyline, haloperidol, and placebo.

    P H Soloff;A George;R S Nathan;P M Schulz

  • Prevention of recurrent postpartum depression: a randomized clinical trial.

    Katherine L. Wisner;James M. Perel;Kathleen S. Peindl;Barbara H. Hanusa

  • 24-hour cortisol measures in adolescents with major depression: a controlled study.

    Ronald E. Dahl;Neal D. Ryan;Joaquim Puig-Antich;Nga A. Nguyen

Frequent Co-Authors

Katherine L. Wisner
Katherine L. Wisner Northwestern University
Bruce G. Pollock
Bruce G. Pollock University of Toronto
Boris Birmaher
Boris Birmaher University of Pittsburgh
Neal D. Ryan
Neal D. Ryan University of Pittsburgh
David J. Kupfer
David J. Kupfer University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Charles F. Reynolds
Charles F. Reynolds University of Pittsburgh
Ronald E. Dahl
Ronald E. Dahl University of California, Berkeley
David A. Brent
David A. Brent University of Pittsburgh
Ellen Frank
Ellen Frank University of Pittsburgh
Michael E. Thase
Michael E. Thase University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more flexible options than ever before, thanks to online degrees. For those interested in advanced nursing roles but haven't previously studied nursing, direct entry np programs for non nurses online allow career-changers to start their journey toward becoming nurse practitioners without a traditional nursing background.

Not ready for a lengthy commitment? Many students are drawn to online adn programs that offer streamlined pathways to an associate degree in nursing. These programs help students quickly gain licensure and enter the workforce.

If you're interested in the healthcare field but not direct patient care, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid can provide solid career prospects with less time in school and financial support options.

For those who want a smoother admissions process, several reputable options exist, such as nursing school no entrance exam programs. These remove standardized testing barriers, making nursing education more accessible.

Exploring alternative or online healthcare degrees is a smart move for those seeking both versatility and efficiency in their medical career journey.

Best Scientists Citing James M. Perel

Recently Published Articles