World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
52
Citations
13824
World Ranking
3399
National Ranking
1194

James A. Fordyce publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Fordyce sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 132 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

James A. Fordyce D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James A. Fordyce sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

James A. Fordyce is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a significant focus on ecology and insect-related studies.

Their work engages extensively with subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Ecology. This specialization is reflected in the main topics of their research which cover Plant and Animal Studies, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, Insect and Pesticide Research, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior.

Fordyce's list of frequent coauthors includes Matthew L. Forister, Chris C. Nice, Christopher A. Halsch, C. Alex Buerkle, and Sarah L. Lebeis. These collaborations highlight a research network that is active across related ecological and biological sciences.

Frequent publication venues for Fordyce include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Ecological Monographs

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Fordyce demonstrate contributions to understanding climate change impacts on insects and ecological interactions:

  • Scientists' warning on climate change and insects, 2022, Ecological Monographs
  • Insects and recent climate change, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Fewer butterflies seen by community scientists across the warming and drying landscapes of the American West, 2021, Science
  • Codependency between plant and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities: what is the evidence?, 2020, New Phytologist
  • Recent hybrids recapitulate ancient hybrid outcomes, 2020, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization

    Daniel I. Bolnick;Richard Svanbäck;Richard Svanbäck;James A. Fordyce;Louie H. Yang

  • Plant genotypic diversity predicts community structure and governs an ecosystem process.

    Gregory M. Crutsinger;Michael D. Collins;James A. Fordyce;Zachariah Gompert

  • MEASURING INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL RESOURCE SPECIALIZATION

    Daniel I. Bolnick;Louie H. Yang;James A. Fordyce;Jeremy M. Davis

  • Scientists' warning on climate change and insects

    Unknown

  • Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity

    Matthew L. Forister;Andrew C. McCall;Nathan J. Sanders;James A. Fordyce

  • Insects and recent climate change

    Christopher A. Halsch;Arthur M. Shapiro;James A. Fordyce;Chris C. Nice

  • The evolutionary consequences of ecological interactions mediated through phenotypic plasticity

    James A. Fordyce

  • Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat.

    Zachariah Gompert;James A. Fordyce;Matthew L. Forister;Arthur M. Shapiro

  • Can optimal defence theory be used to predict the distribution of plant chemical defences

    Andrew C. McCall;James A. Fordyce

  • What, if anything, is sympatric speciation?

    B. M. Fitzpatrick;J. A. Fordyce;S. Gavrilets

  • Pattern, process and geographic modes of speciation

    B. M. Fitzpatrick;J. A. Fordyce;S. Gavrilets;S. Gavrilets

  • Admixture and the organization of genetic diversity in a butterfly species complex revealed through common and rare genetic variants.

    Zachariah Gompert;Lauren K. Lucas;Lauren K. Lucas;C. Alex Buerkle;Matthew L. Forister

  • What can DNA tell us about biological invasions

    Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick;James A. Fordyce;Matthew L. Niemiller;R. Graham Reynolds

  • The role of plant trichomes and caterpillar group size on growth and defence of the pipevine swallowtail Battus philenor

    James A. Fordyce;Anurag A. Agrawal

  • Genomic regions with a history of divergent selection affect fitness of hybrids between two butterfly species.

    Zachariah Gompert;Lauren K. Lucas;Chris C. Nice;James A. Fordyce

  • Host shifts and evolutionary radiations of butterflies.

    James A. Fordyce

  • Widespread mito-nuclear discordance with evidence for introgressive hybridization and selective sweeps in Lycaeides.

    Zachariah Gompert;Matthew L. Forister;James A. Fordyce;Chris C. Nice

  • Fewer butterflies seen by community scientists across the warming and drying landscapes of the American West

    M. L. Forister;C. A. Halsch;C. C. Nice;J. A. Fordyce

  • The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species

    J. A. Fordyce;C. C. Nice;M. L. Forister;A. M. Shapiro

  • Bayesian analysis of molecular variance in pyrosequences quantifies population genetic structure across the genome of Lycaeides butterflies.

    Zachariah Gompert;Matthew L. Forister;James A. Fordyce;Chris C. Nice

  • Strong influence of regional species pools on continent-wide structuring of local communities

    Jean-Philippe Lessard;Jean-Philippe Lessard;Michael K. Borregaard;James A. Fordyce;Carsten Rahbek

  • ARE INDUCED DEFENSES COSTLY? CONSEQUENCES OF PREDATOR-INDUCED DEFENSES IN WESTERN TOADS, BUFO BOREAS

    Michael F. Benard;James A. Fordyce

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris C. Nice
Chris C. Nice Texas State University
Matthew L. Forister
Matthew L. Forister University of Nevada Reno
Zachariah Gompert
Zachariah Gompert Utah State University
C. Alex Buerkle
C. Alex Buerkle University of Wyoming
Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick
Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Nathan J. Sanders
Nathan J. Sanders University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James H. Thorne
James H. Thorne University of California, Davis
Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Philip J. DeVries
Philip J. DeVries University of New Orleans
Richard Svanbäck
Richard Svanbäck Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens up diverse career paths, but many students are interested in related fields that combine environmental science with human wellbeing. Online degrees in areas like psychology and human services are becoming increasingly popular, especially for those looking to work in education, conservation, or public policy.

If you are passionate about the developmental aspects of behavior and the environment, a masters in child psychology could be a strategic option. This degree provides insight into the psychological aspects of children, which can complement ecological research in education or community projects.

For students interested in supporting communities, online master degree programs in counseling offer flexibility and career versatility. Working as a counselor or coordinating outreach can pave the way for roles in environmental education or advocacy.

A clinical psychology online degree is ideal for those who want to understand individual and group behaviors, including how people interact with their environment. Similarly, a human services online program provides resources to work in support roles at nonprofits, community organizations, and governments.

Best Scientists Citing James A. Fordyce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles