World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 39 2085 1937 771 676 117 12015

Jake J. Abbott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jake J. Abbott between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jake J. Abbott published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2009. 8 of the 152 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2009. 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2003 2025

152 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jake J. Abbott: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 4
2004 2
2005 2
2006 4
2007 9
2008 8
2009 12
2010 10
2011 9
2012 7
2013 7
2014 8
2015 7
2016 6
2017 7
2018 8
2019 3
2020 10
2021 8
2022 9
2023 4
2024 3
2025 5
Total 152
Download as CSV

Jake J. Abbott publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake J. Abbott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 117 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115 117
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Jake J. Abbott D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jake J. Abbott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126 39
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jake J. Abbott is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, emphasizing engineering, physics and astronomy, and neuroscience.

The principal subfields of study in their work include cognitive neuroscience, condensed matter physics, biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, and astronomy and astrophysics. Their main research topics encompass micro and nano robotics, soft robotics and applications, tactile and sensory interactions, modular robots and swarm intelligence, planetary science and exploration, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and astro and planetary science.

Notable recent publications by Jake J. Abbott cover a range of topics in robotics and medical engineering. These include:

  • Dexterous magnetic manipulation of conductive non-magnetic objects, 2021, Nature
  • Magnetically Steered Robotic Insertion of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays: System Integration and First-In-Cadaver Results, 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Kinematic Model of a Magnetic-Microrobot Swarm in a Rotating Magnetic Dipole Field, 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Soft Endoluminal Robots Propelled by Rotating Magnetic Dipole Fields, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
  • Modeling and Analysis of a Soft Endoluminal Inchworm Robot Propelled by a Rotating Magnetic Dipole Field, 2021, Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Abbott include Adam J. Sperry, Lan N. Pham, Griffin F. Tabor, Ashkan Pourkand, and Tucker Hermans.

Their publications frequently appear in venues such as IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, IEEE Transactions on Haptics, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, Otology & Neurotology, and Science Robotics.

Best Publications

  • Microrobots for Minimally Invasive Medicine

    Bradley J. Nelson;Ioannis K. Kaliakatsos;Jake J. Abbott

  • Artificial bacterial flagella: Fabrication and magnetic control

    Li Zhang;Jake J. Abbott;Lixin Dong;Bradley E. Kratochvil

  • OctoMag: An Electromagnetic System for 5-DOF Wireless Micromanipulation

    M P Kummer;J J Abbott;B E Kratochvil;R Borer

  • How Should Microrobots Swim

    Jake J. Abbott;Kathrin E. Peyer;Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino;Li Zhang

  • Robotics in the Small, Part I: Microbotics

    J.J. Abbott;Z. Nagy;F. Beyeler;B.J. Nelson

  • Haptic virtual fixtures for robot-assisted manipulation

    Jake J. Abbott;Jake J. Abbott;Panadda Marayong;Allison M. Okamura

  • Modeling magnetic torque and force for controlled manipulation of soft-magnetic bodies

    J.J. Abbott;O. Ergeneman;M.P. Kummer;A.M. Hirt

  • Magnetic Methods in Robotics

    Jake J. Abbott;Eric Diller;Andrew J. Petruska

  • Effects of position quantization and sampling rate on virtual-wall passivity

    J.J. Abbott;A.M. Okamura

  • Five-degree-of-freedom manipulation of an untethered magnetic device in fluid using a single permanent magnet with application in stomach capsule endoscopy

    Arthur W. Mahoney;Jake J. Abbott

  • Generating Rotating Magnetic Fields With a Single Permanent Magnet for Propulsion of Untethered Magnetic Devices in a Lumen

    Arthur W. Mahoney;Jake J. Abbott

  • An Avian-Inspired Passive Mechanism for Quadrotor Perching

    C. E. Doyle;J. J. Bird;T. A. Isom;J. C. Kallman

  • Behavior of rotating magnetic microrobots above the step-out frequency with application to control of multi-microrobot systems

    Arthur W. Mahoney;Nathan D. Nelson;Kathrin E. Peyer;Bradley J. Nelson

  • Wireless control of magnetic helical microrobots using a rotating-permanent-magnet manipulator

    Thomas W. R. Fountain;Prem V. Kailat;Jake J. Abbott

  • Velocity Control with Gravity Compensation for Magnetic Helical Microswimmers

    Arthur W. Mahoney;John C. Sarrazin;Eberhard Bamberg;Jake J. Abbott

  • Virtual fixture architectures for telemanipulation

    J.J. Abbott;A.M. Okamura

  • Toward targeted retinal drug delivery with wireless magnetic microrobots

    G. Dogangil;O. Ergeneman;J.J. Abbott;S. Pane

  • Managing magnetic force applied to a magnetic device by a rotating dipole field

    Arthur W. Mahoney;Jake J. Abbott

  • Stable Forbidden-Region Virtual Fixtures for Bilateral Telemanipulation

    Jake J. Abbott;Allison M. Okamura

  • Six-Degree-of-Freedom Localization of an Untethered Magnetic Capsule Using a Single Rotating Magnetic Dipole

    Katie M. Popek;Thomas Schmid;Jake J. Abbott

  • Pseudo-admittance Bilateral Telemanipulation with Guidance Virtual Fixtures

    Jake J. Abbott;Allison M. Okamura

  • OctoMag: An electromagnetic system for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation

    B. E. Kratochvil;M. P. Kummer;J. J. Abbott;R. Borer

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison M. Okamura
Allison M. Okamura Stanford University
Lixin Dong
Lixin Dong City University of Hong Kong
Kam K. Leang
Kam K. Leang University of Utah
Ann M. Hirt
Ann M. Hirt ETH Zurich
Paul S. Bernstein
Paul S. Bernstein University of Utah
Robert J. Webster
Robert J. Webster Vanderbilt University
John M. Hollerbach
John M. Hollerbach University of Utah
Salvador Pané
Salvador Pané ETH Zurich
Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin
Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in diversifying their skills beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open new career doors. Programs like accredited easiest counseling degree programs offer a practical route into mental health professions, combining flexibility and accreditation to fit busy schedules.

Similarly, those interested in behavioral sciences may consider fast-track options such as the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis. These programs provide efficient pathways to becoming certified behavior analysts, applicable in healthcare and educational settings.

For careers involving speech and hearing, gaining entry into quality graduate programs is crucial. Understanding slp graduate programs requirements and acceptance rates helps prospective students strengthen their applications and increase their chances of success.

Additionally, for those interested in audiology, exploring the easiest audiology programs to get into can provide insight into programs with more accessible entry criteria without compromising educational quality.

Best Scientists Citing Jake J. Abbott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles