World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard

Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1137 1057 40 38 135 13157

Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard between 1994 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard published across 28 years, from 1994 to 2021, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 7 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications
1994 2021

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard: publications per year, 1994 to 2021
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 2
1996 6
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 1
2007 3
2008 1
2009 8
2010 4
2011 9
2012 17
2013 12
2014 8
2015 18
2016 15
2017 12
2018 11
2019 11
2020 4
2021 3
Total 167
Download as CSV

Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–139 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 135 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69 135
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69 47
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on business, management, and accounting as well as medicine.

The scientist's work covers several specialized subfields including strategy and management, public health, environmental and occupational health, food science, industrial and manufacturing engineering, and ecology. Their research topics concentrate on sustainable supply chain management, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, nutritional studies and diet, food supply chain traceability, odor and emission control technologies, municipal solid waste management, and food waste reduction and sustainability.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard include:

  • The quality-driven vehicle routing problem: Model and application to a case of cooperative logistics, 2020, International Journal of Production Economics
  • Assessing the eco-effectiveness of a solid waste management plan using agent-based modelling, 2021, Waste Management
  • Improving health and carbon footprints of European diets using a benchmarking approach, 2020, Public Health Nutrition
  • Designing healthier and acceptable diets using data envelopment analysis, 2020, Public Health Nutrition
  • Value of data in multi-level supply chain decisions: a case study in the Dutch floriculture sector, 2020, International Journal of Production Research

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Argyris Kanellopoulos
  • Behzad Behdani
  • Johanna M. Geleijnse
  • Helena M. Stellingwerf
  • Leendert H.C. Groeneveld

The most common publication venues for Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard's work are:

  • Public Health Nutrition
  • International Journal of Production Economics
  • Waste Management
  • International Journal of Production Research
  • European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

Best Publications

  • Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review

    Moritz Fleischmann;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Rommert Dekker;Erwin van der Laan

  • The Impact of Product Recovery on Logistics Network Design

    Moritz Fleischmann;Moritz Fleischmann;Patrick Beullens;Patrick Beullens;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Luk N. Van Wassenhove;Luk N. Van Wassenhove

  • Operations Research for Green Logistics – An Overview of Aspects, Issues, Contributions and Challenges

    Rommert Dekker;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof;Ioannis Mallidis

  • Designing and Evaluating Sustainable Logistics Networks

    J. Quariguasi Frota Neto;J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;J.A.E.E. van Nunen;E. van Heck

  • Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators

    H.R. Krikke;J. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;L.N. van Wassenhove

  • Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains - Current status and challenges

    P. M. (Nel) Wognum;Harry Bremmers;Jacques H. Trienekens;Jack G. A. J. van der Vorst

  • Interactions between operational research and environmental management

    Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Paul van Beek;Leen Hordijk;Luk N. Van Wassenhove

  • Modeling a green inventory routing problem for perishable products with horizontal collaboration

    Mehmet Soysal;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Rene Haijema;Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst

  • Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management

    Xiaoyun Bing;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof;Tania Rodrigues Pereira Ramos;Ana Paula Barbosa-Povoa

  • Sustainable agro-food supply chain design using two-stage hybrid multi-objective decision-making approach

    Unknown

  • Modelling food logistics networks with emission considerations: The case of an international beef supply chain

    M. Soysal;J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;J.G.A.J. van der Vorst

  • A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks

    Unknown

  • Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization : A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain

    Aleksander Banasik;Argyris Kanellopoulos;G.D.H. Claassen;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard

  • From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the WEEE case

    Unknown

  • The time dependent two echelon capacitated vehicle routing problem with environmental considerations

    Mehmet Soysal;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Tolga Bektaş

  • Knowledge Sharing in an Emerging Network of Practice:: The Role of a Knowledge Portal

    Peter van Baalen;Jacqueline Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Eric van Heck

  • Modeling an Inventory Routing Problem for perishable products with environmental considerations and demand uncertainty

    Unknown

  • An environmental life cycle optimization model for the European pulp and paper industry

    J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;L.N. Van Wassenhove;H.L. Gabel;P.M. Weaver

  • Proactive environmental strategy in a supply chain context: The mediating role of investments

    Melek Akın Ateş;Jacqueline Bloemhof;Erik M. van Raaij;Finn Wynstra

  • Global reverse supply chain redesign for household plastic waste under the emission trading scheme

    Xiaoyun Bing;Jacqueline Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Amin Chaabane;Jack van der Vorst

  • Discounting and dynamic shelf life to reduce fresh food waste at retailers

    M.E. Buisman;R. Haijema;J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard

  • Reverse Logistics Network Design

    Moritz Fleischmann;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Patrick Beullens;Rommert Dekker

  • A Review on Quantitative Models for Sustainable Food Logistics Management

    M. Soysal;J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;M.P.M. Meuwissen;J.G.A.J. van der Vorst

  • Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains : a review

    Aleksander Banasik;Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard;Argyris Kanellopoulos;G. D. H. Claassen

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Krikke
Harold Krikke The Open University
Rommert Dekker
Rommert Dekker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul M. Weaver
Paul M. Weaver University of Limerick
Johanna M. Geleijnse
Johanna M. Geleijnse Wageningen University & Research
Wim H. Rulkens
Wim H. Rulkens Wageningen University & Research
Tolga Bektaş
Tolga Bektaş University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As business and management fields continue to evolve, online learning offers flexible options to build specialized skills. High-quality programs from the best online universities ensure that you can access accredited education tailored to your goals, whether you’re seeking a foundational degree or looking to advance your career.

For those aspiring to lead organizations or drive change, an online PhD organizational leadership can provide in-depth knowledge of leadership strategies and research methods. Similarly, related business sectors like construction are expanding their need for managers, making the construction degrees that can be earned online both relevant and in-demand.

Healthcare is another dynamic industry where management expertise is highly valued. With an online healthcare administration degree, you can train specifically for leadership roles in medical facilities and health organizations. By exploring these online degrees, students position themselves for upward mobility and new career pathways across a range of growing sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles