World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2587 2362 1264 1141 161 10315

J. Paul Leigh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. Paul Leigh between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. Paul Leigh published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1986. 5 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1986. 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 12 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. Paul Leigh: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 5
1982 2
1983 3
1984 2
1985 5
1986 12
1987 5
1988 6
1989 4
1990 4
1991 7
1992 5
1993 6
1994 4
1995 6
1996 1
1997 6
1998 5
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 3
2004 5
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 6
2012 3
2013 3
2014 1
2015 8
2016 4
2017 2
2018 2
2019 2
2020 2
2021 4
2022 1
2023 2
2024 2
2025 3
Total 175
Download as CSV

J. Paul Leigh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Paul Leigh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 161
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

J. Paul Leigh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Paul Leigh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

J. Paul Leigh is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Health Professions, Social Sciences, and Medicine, with a particular focus on General Health Professions. The subfields within their work cover topics like Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research addresses several main topics, particularly Employment and Welfare Studies, Health Disparities and Outcomes, and Global Health Care Issues. Other notable areas within their work include Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention, Workplace Health and Well-being, and Retirement, Disability, and Employment.

J. Paul Leigh has published papers in multiple academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Economics & Human Biology
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • The Lancet Public Health
  • Preventive Medicine Reports
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health

Some recent papers authored by J. Paul Leigh include:

  • "Labor unions and health: A literature review of pathways and outcomes in the workplace," published in 2021 in Preventive Medicine Reports
  • "Treatment design, health outcomes, and demographic categories in the literature on minimum wages and health," published in 2021 in Economics & Human Biology
  • "Invited Commentary: Methods for Estimating Effects of Minimum Wages on Health," published in 2020 in American Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Response to Douglas A. Wolf comment on 'Treatment design, health outcomes, and demographic categories in the literature on minimum wages and health,'" published in 2022 in Economics & Human Biology

J. Paul Leigh has also contributed as a coauthor to a broader collaborative work on "The burden and trend of diseases and their risk factors in Australia, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019," published in 2023 in The Lancet Public Health.

The researcher frequently collaborates with other scholars, including:

  • Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
  • Ralph Maddison
  • Riaz Uddin
  • Kylie Ball
  • Katherine M. Livingstone

Best Publications

  • Economic Burden of Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States

    J Paul Leigh

  • Brief Report: Forecasting the Economic Burden of Autism in 2015 and 2025 in the United States.

    J Paul Leigh;Juan Du

  • Physician career satisfaction across specialties.

    J. Paul Leigh;Richard L. Kravitz;Mike Schembri;Steven J. Samuels

  • Schooling, Self-Selection, and Health

    Mark C. Berger;J. Paul Leigh

  • The effects of unemployment and the business cycle on absenteeism

    J.Paul Leigh

  • Physician career satisfaction within specialties

    J Paul Leigh;Daniel J Tancredi;Richard L Kravitz

  • The effect of alcohol use on wages

    Mark C. Berger;J. Paul Leigh

  • Employee and job attributes as predictors of absenteeism in a national sample of workers: The importance of health and dangerous working conditions

    J.Paul Leigh;J.Paul Leigh

  • Costs of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses

    J. Paul Leigh;Steven Markowitz;Marianne Fahs;Philip Landrigan

  • Direct and indirect effects of education on health

    J.Paul Leigh

  • Progression of Functional Disability in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Associations With Rheumatology Subspecialty Care

    Michael M. Ward;J. Paul Leigh;J. Paul Leigh;James F. Fries

  • Sex Differences in Absenteeism

    J. Paul Leigh

  • Costs of occupational injuries in agriculture.

    J. Paul Leigh;Stephen A. McCurdy;Marc B. Schenker

  • Costs of occupational COPD and asthma.

    J. Paul Leigh;Patrick S. Romano;Marc B. Schenker;Kathleen Kreiss

  • Costs of occupational injury and illness across industries.

    J Paul Leigh;Geetha Waehrer;Ted R. Miller;Craig R Keenan

  • Occupational Disease and Workers’ Compensation: Coverage, Costs, and Consequences

    J Paul Leigh;John A Robbins

  • Costs of hepatitis C.

    J. Paul Leigh;Christopher L. Bowlus;Bruce N. Leistikow;Marc Schenker

  • Cigarette Prices, Smoking, and the Poor: Implications of Recent Trends

    Peter Franks;Anthony F. Jerant;J. Paul Leigh;Dennis Lee

  • An estimate of the U.S. government's undercount of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses in agriculture

    J. Paul Leigh;Juan Du;Stephen A. McCurdy

  • Randomized Controlled Study of a Retiree Health Promotion Program The Bank of America Study

    J. Paul Leigh;J. Paul Leigh;Nancy Richardson;Robert Beck;Clark Kerr

  • Costs of occupational injury and illness within the health services sector

    Geetha Waehrer;J. Paul Leigh;Ted R. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Fries
James F. Fries Stanford University
Richard L. Kravitz
Richard L. Kravitz University of California, Davis
Patrick S. Romano
Patrick S. Romano University of California, Davis
Ted R. Miller
Ted R. Miller Pacific Institute
Daniel J. Tancredi
Daniel J. Tancredi University of California, Davis
Mark C. Berger
Mark C. Berger University of Kentucky
Philip J. Landrigan
Philip J. Landrigan Boston College
Peter Franks
Peter Franks University of California, Davis
John A Robbins
John A Robbins University of California, Davis
Ana-Maria Iosif
Ana-Maria Iosif University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The Social Sciences and Humanities fields offer diverse online degree options tailored for flexible learning. Many professionals opt for advanced programs, such as online psyd degrees, which open doors to clinical and counseling careers in psychology. These programs often prepare graduates for licensure or specialized positions in healthcare and education.

Counseling and mental health remain high-demand sectors. Students interested in family therapy can pursue mft programs online—these are designed for those who want to become marriage and family therapists while balancing work and study.

Budget is also top of mind for many considering graduate study. Understanding how much does a masters in psychology cost can help you plan financially and choose the best-value program for your needs.

Professionals seeking advancement in education can enroll in accelerated edd degrees. These fast-track programs are perfect for educators eager to move into leadership roles or higher-level administrative positions more quickly.

Best Scientists Citing J. Paul Leigh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles