World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ivona Brandic

Ivona Brandic

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
14965
World Ranking
10444
National Ranking
91

Ivona Brandic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivona Brandic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ivona Brandic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivona Brandic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivona Brandic is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has a research focus primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their work covers multiple subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Control and Systems Engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Scientific Computing and Data Management, and Age of Information Optimization.

Ivona Brandic's recent publications include the following papers:

  • AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions, 2022, Internet of Things
  • Learning Spatiotemporal Failure Dependencies for Resilient Edge Computing Services, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
  • Multiagent Bayesian Deep Reinforcement Learning for Microgrid Energy Management Under Communication Failures, 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • The computing continuum: From IoT to the cloud, 2024, Internet of Things
  • Towards an Integrated Platform for Big Data Analysis, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Internet of Things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, and IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

Collaborations have been a significant part of their research activities, with notable co-authors including:

  • Shashikant Ilager
  • Atakan Aral
  • Vincenzo De Maio
  • Melike Erol-Kantarci
  • Alessandro Tundo

Best Publications

  • Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility

    Rajkumar Buyya;Chee Shin Yeo;Srikumar Venugopal;James Broberg

  • AI for Next Generation Computing: Emerging Trends and Future Directions

    Unknown

  • Cloud Computing: Survey on Energy Efficiency

    Toni Mastelic;Ariel Oleksiak;Holger Claussen;Ivona Brandic

  • Low level Metrics to High level SLAs - LoM2HiS framework: Bridging the gap between monitored metrics and SLA parameters in cloud environments

    Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Ivona Brandic;Michael Maurer;Schahram Dustdar

  • A survey on service quality description

    Kyriakos Kritikos;Barbara Pernici;Pierluigi Plebani;Cinzia Cappiello

  • Towards autonomic detection of SLA violations in Cloud infrastructures

    Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Marco A. S. Netto;Rodrigo N. Calheiros;Ivona Brandic

  • Monitoring and Analyzing Influential Factors of Business Process Performance

    Branimir Wetzstein;Philipp Leitner;Florian Rosenberg;Ivona Brandic

  • Adaptive resource configuration for Cloud infrastructure management

    Michael Maurer;Ivona Brandic;Rizos Sakellariou

  • Compliant Cloud Computing (C3): Architecture and Language Support for User-Driven Compliance Management in Clouds

    Ivona Brandic;Schahram Dustdar;Tobias Anstett;David Schumm

  • SLA-Aware Application Deployment and Resource Allocation in Clouds

    Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Ivona Brandic;Michael Maurer;Ivan Breskovic

  • Towards Self-Manageable Cloud Services

    Ivona Brandic

  • CASViD: Application Level Monitoring for SLA Violation Detection in Clouds

    Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Tiago C. Ferreto;Marco. A. S. Netto;Ivona Brandic

  • QoS support for time-critical grid workflow applications

    I. Brandic;S. Benkner;G. Engelbrecht;R. Schmidt

  • An SLA-based resource virtualization approach for on-demand service provision

    Attila Kertesz;Gabor Kecskemeti;Ivona Brandic

  • Cost-benefit analysis of an SLA mapping approach for defining standardized Cloud computing goods

    Michael Maurer;Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Ivona Brandic;JöRn Altmann

  • Energy-efficient and SLA-aware management of IaaS clouds

    Damien Borgetto;Michael Maurer;Georges Da-Costa;Jean-Marc Pierson

  • An interoperable and self-adaptive approach for SLA-based service virtualization in heterogeneous Cloud environments

    A. Kertesz;G. Kecskemeti;I. Brandic

  • Enacting SLAs in clouds using rules

    Michael Maurer;Ivona Brandic;Rizos Sakellariou

  • LAYSI: A Layered Approach for SLA-Violation Propagation in Self-Manageable Cloud Infrastructures

    Ivona Brandic;Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Michael Maurer;Schahram Dustdar

  • VGE - A Service-Oriented Grid Environment for On-Demand Supercomputing

    Siegfried Benkner;Ivona Brandic;Gerhard Engelbrecht;Rainer Schmidt

  • Revealing the MAPE loop for the autonomic management of Cloud infrastructures

    Michael Maurer;Ivan Breskovic;Vincent C. Emeakaroha;Ivona Brandic

Frequent Co-Authors

Rizos Sakellariou
Rizos Sakellariou University of Manchester
Helen D. Karatza
Helen D. Karatza Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Rajkumar Buyya
Rajkumar Buyya University of Melbourne
Joanna Kolodziej
Joanna Kolodziej NASK National Research Institute
Melike Erol-Kantarci
Melike Erol-Kantarci University of Ottawa
Srikumar Venugopal
Srikumar Venugopal IBM Research - Ireland
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan
Erik Elmroth
Erik Elmroth Umeå University
Aniruddha Gokhale
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields can open up diverse career opportunities beyond traditional Computer Science roles. For instance, combining computing expertise with environmental knowledge can lead to a broad range of jobs for environmental science majors, including positions in sustainability analytics, data management, and environmental monitoring.

If you are looking to complete your degree efficiently, consider online programs that allow you to finish faster. The fastest computer science degree programs offer an accelerated path, helping you enter the workforce sooner or transition careers more quickly.

Career-focused students might also explore related disciplines such as engineering. There are flexible, online options for those interested in environmental technology, including increasingly popular environmental engineering degrees online that prepare graduates for roles in green technology and infrastructure.

Cost is often a concern for prospective students. Prospective engineers, for example, can review options for the most mechanical engineering cost of education to find programs that fit their budget while still providing a solid online education.

Best Scientists Citing Ivona Brandic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles