World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
7938
World Ranking
5060
National Ranking
529

Hui Lu publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hui Lu sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 134 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hui Lu D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hui Lu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Insights into the Fate and Removal of Antibiotics in Engineered Biological Treatment Systems: A Critical Review

    Akashdeep Singh Oberoi;Yanyan Jia;Huiqun Zhang;Samir Kumar Khanal

  • Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives

    Fernanda R. Oliveira;Anil K. Patel;Deb P. Jaisi;Sushil Adhikari

  • A review of biological sulfate conversions in wastewater treatment.

    Tianwei Hao;Pengyu Xiang;Hamish Robert Mackey;Kun Chi

  • Understanding the Role of Extracellular Polymeric Substances on Ciprofloxacin Adsorption in Aerobic Sludge, Anaerobic Sludge, and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Sludge Systems.

    Huiqun Zhang;Yanyan Jia;Samir Kumar Khanal;Hui Lu

  • A novel sulfate reduction, autotrophic denitrification, nitrification integrated (SANI) process for saline wastewater treatment.

    Jin Wang;Hui Lu;Guang-Hao Chen;G. Ngai Lau

  • Sulfamethoxazole degradation in anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria sludge system.

    Yanyan Jia;Samir Kumar Khanal;Huiqun Zhang;Guang-Hao Chen

  • Ciprofloxacin degradation in anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) sludge system: Mechanism and pathways.

    Yanyan Jia;Samir Kumar Khanal;Haoyue Shu;Huiqun Zhang

  • Sulfide-driven autotrophic denitrification significantly reduces N2O emissions.

    Weiming Yang;Qing Zhao;Hui Lu;Zhi Ding

  • Carbothermal reduction for preparing nZVI/BC to extract uranium: Insight into the iron species dependent uranium adsorption behavior

    Huimin Zhang;Yang Ruan;Aiping Liang;Kaimin Shih

  • Advances in elemental sulfur-driven bioprocesses for wastewater treatment: From metabolic study to application.

    Unknown

  • Granulation of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria for autotrophic denitrification

    Weiming Yang;Hui Lu;Samir K. Khanal;Qing Zhao

  • Ciprofloxacin-degrading Paraclostridium sp. isolated from sulfate-reducing bacteria-enriched sludge: Optimization and mechanism.

    Heting Fang;Akashdeep Singh Oberoi;Zhiqing He;Samir Kumar Khanal

  • Elucidating the stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dissolved sulfide on sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) driven autotrophic denitrification

    Hui Lu;Haiqin Huang;Weiming Yang;Hamish Robert Mackey

  • Stress-responses of activated sludge and anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria sludge under long-term ciprofloxacin exposure.

    Huiqun Zhang;Shiliu Song;Yanyan Jia;Yanyan Jia;Di Wu

  • Blackening and odorization of urban rivers: a bio-geochemical process

    Zhiwei Liang;Michael Siegert;Michael Siegert;Wenwen Fang;Yu Sun

  • Untapped Potential: Applying Microbubble and Nanobubble Technology in Water and Wastewater Treatment and Ecological Restoration

    Unknown

  • Characterization of sulfate-reducing granular sludge in the SANI® process

    Tianwei Hao;Li Wei;Hui Lu;Ho Kwong Chui

  • Nanobubble technology applications in environmental and agricultural systems: Opportunities and challenges

    Unknown

  • Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the sulfur cycle-associated Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) process.

    Di Wu;George A. Ekama;Hai Guang Wang;Li Wei

  • A Critical Review of Methods for Analyzing Freshwater Eutrophication

    Yan Zhang;Mingxuan Li;Jiefeng Dong;Hong Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Chang-Qi Ma
Chang-Qi Ma Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jie Wang
Jie Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Wenzhong Shen
Wenzhong Shen Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Hong Liu
Hong Liu Shandong University
Yan-Qing Li
Yan-Qing Li East China Normal University
Xuguang Liu
Xuguang Liu Taiyuan University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences opens doors to a diverse range of career opportunities. For those interested in broadening their academic options, programs like most affordable online general studies degree programs offer flexibility and a strong foundation for interdisciplinary learning.

Students looking to specialize further might consider pursuing a geology degree online, which complements environmental science studies by deepening understanding of earth processes and natural resource management.

For those aiming at advanced roles in research or social impact, investigating dsw programs could be beneficial, especially since social work intersects with environmental justice and community health.

Additionally, if you're seeking a program that balances ease of study with relevance, exploring the easiest degree to get might provide a practical pathway to entering the environmental field quickly and effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Hui Lu

Recently Published Articles