World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
10338
World Ranking
6138
National Ranking
2760

Hillol Kargupta publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillol Kargupta sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hillol Kargupta D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillol Kargupta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to distributed data mining

Overview

Hillol Kargupta is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. The scientist's research has contributed to the field of distributed data mining, a specialization recognized by the IEEE Fellowship awarded in 2011 for contributions to this area.

Kargupta's work primarily revolves around distributed data mining methodologies and their applications. The IEEE Fellow award indicates a significant impact within this specialized field, particularly concerning distributed computing systems and data analysis techniques that operate over decentralized networks.

While detailed information about specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or topics beyond the primary affiliation and award is not available, the acknowledgment by a prestigious professional body such as IEEE suggests an engagement with advanced computational frameworks related to mining information from distributed datasets.

This profile summarizes Hillol Kargupta's academic standing and focus on distributed data mining, framed within their association at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

Best Publications

  • On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques

    H. Kargupta;S. Datta;Q. Wang;Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar

  • Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining

    Kun Liu;H. Kargupta;J. Ryan

  • RapidAccurate Optimization of Difficult Problems Using Fast Messy Genetic Algorithms

    David E. Goldberg;Kalyanmoy Deb;Hillol Kargupta;Georges Harik

  • In-network outlier detection in wireless sensor networks

    Joel W. Branch;Chris Giannella;Boleslaw K. Szymanski;Ran Wolff

  • Onboard vehicle data mining, social networking, and pattern-based advertisement

    Hillol Kargupta

  • In-Network Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks

    J. Branch;B. Szymanski;C. Giannella;Ran Wolff

  • Distributed Data Mining in Peer-to-Peer Networks

    S. Datta;K. Bhaduri;C. Giannella;R. Wolff

  • Random-data perturbation techniques and privacy-preserving data mining

    Hillol Kargupta;Souptik Datta;Qi Wang;Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar

  • Advances in Distributed and Parallel Knowledge Discovery

    Hillol Kargupta;Philip Chan

  • Distributed clustering using collective principal component analysis

    Hillol Kargupta;Weiyun Huang;Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar;Erik Johnson

  • The Gene Expression Messy Genetic Algorithm

    H. Kargupta

  • Clustering distributed data streams in peer-to-peer environments

    Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay;Chris Giannella;Ujjwal Maulik;Hillol Kargupta

  • VEDAS: A Mobile and Distributed Data Stream Mining System for Real-Time Vehicle Monitoring.

    Hillol Kargupta;Ruchita Bhargava;Kun Liu;Michael Powers

  • Scalable, distributed data mining—an agent architecture

    Hillol Kargupta;Ilker Hamzaoglu;Brian Stafford

  • An attacker's view of distance preserving maps for privacy preserving data mining

    Kun Liu;Chris Giannella;Hillol Kargupta

  • Collective, Hierarchical Clustering from Distributed, Heterogeneous Data

    Erik L. Johnson;Hillol Kargupta

  • Approximate Distributed K-Means Clustering over a Peer-to-Peer Network

    S. Datta;C.R. Giannella;H. Kargupta

  • MobiMine: monitoring the stock market from a PDA

    Hillol Kargupta;Byung-Hoon Park;Sweta Pittie;Lei Liu

  • K-Means Clustering Over a Large, Dynamic Network.

    Souptik Datta;Chris Giannella;Hillol Kargupta

  • Distributed data mining and agents

    Josenildo C. da Silva;Chris Giannella;Ruchita Bhargava;Hillol Kargupta

  • Data Mining: Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions

    Hillol Kargupta;Anupam Joshi;Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar;Yelena Yesha

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip K. Chan
Philip K. Chan Florida Institute of Technology
Anupam Joshi
Anupam Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay
Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay Indian Statistical Institute
Boleslaw K. Szymanski
Boleslaw K. Szymanski Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
David E. Goldberg
David E. Goldberg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Vipin Kumar
Vipin Kumar University of Minnesota
Jiawei Han
Jiawei Han University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kalyanmoy Deb
Kalyanmoy Deb Michigan State University
Tim Finin
Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Fei-Yue Wang
Fei-Yue Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring 6 month degree course options can be a fast track to entering the computer science field. These accelerated programs allow students to quickly gain technical skills and foundational knowledge, making them ideal for career changers or those eager to join the workforce.

For those looking at broader career options, online business degrees are an excellent complement to tech expertise. Cost is a major consideration, and comparing the business administration degree online cost can help you find programs that match your budget without sacrificing quality.

Many students pursue an online bachelor degree in computer science or a related field to unlock even more advanced career opportunities. Flexibility, remote learning options, and affordability are driving more students to choose online education for their long-term goals.

For individuals interested in the intersection of computing and engineering, there are also affordable engineering online programs. These programs blend engineering concepts with technical skills, preparing graduates for roles in fast-growing STEM industries.

Best Scientists Citing Hillol Kargupta

Trending Scientists