World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
10110
World Ranking
7287
National Ranking
10

Gonzalo Halffter publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gonzalo Halffter sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Gonzalo Halffter D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gonzalo Halffter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Gonzalo Halffter was affiliated with the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Their research primarily focused on Agricultural and Biological Sciences, along with significant contributions to Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work extended across several subfields including Paleontology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's research themes included Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography, Plant and Soil Sciences, Mediterranean and Iberian Flora and Fauna, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Botany and Geology in Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as studies on Coleoptera: Cerambycidae and Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution.

Gonzalo Halffter published in various academic journals. Frequent publication venues were:

  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N S )
  • European Journal of Taxonomy
  • The Coleopterists Bulletin
  • Biologia

Some of the recent papers associated with Halffter included:

  • Gamma diversity: derived from and a determinant of alpha diversity and beta diversity. An analysis of three tropical landscapes, 2022, ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N S )
  • Toward a standardized methodology for sampling dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the Neotropics: A critical review, 2023, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • Taxonomic revision of the Phanaeus endymion species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), with the descriptions of five new species, 2021, European Journal of Taxonomy
  • Variations in genetic structure and male genitalia suggest recent lineage diversification in the Neotropical dung beetle complexCanthon cyanellus(Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), 2020, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Two New Species of the Onthophagus clypeatus Species Group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae), 2020, Florida Entomologist

Gonzalo Halffter frequently collaborated with the following coauthors:

  • Víctor Moctezuma
  • Alejandro Espinosa de los Monteros
  • Alfonsina Arriaga-Jiménez
  • Janet Nolasco-Soto
  • Mario E. Favila

During their career, Halffter was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • The natural history of dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)

    E. G. Matthews;Gonzalo Halffter

  • The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae) : an ecological and evolutive approach

    Gonzalo Halffter;W. D. Edmonds

  • Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves

    Claudia E. Moreno;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Biogeography of the Montane Entomofauna of Mexico and Central America

    Gonzalo Halffter

  • THE USE OF INDICATOR GROUPS FOR MEASURING BIODIVERSITY AS RELATED TO COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

    Mario E. Favila;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico

    Eduardo Pineda;Claudia Moreno;Frederico Escobar;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Historical and ecological factors determining the geographical distribution of beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae)

    Gonzalo Halffter

  • Response of Dung Beetle Diversity to Human-induced Changes in a Tropical Landscape1

    Gonzalo Halffter;Lucrecia Arellano

  • A comparative study of the structure of the scarab guild in Mexican tropical rain forests and derived ecosystems

    Gonzalo Halffter;Mario E Favila;Violeta Halffter

  • Species diversity and habitat fragmentation: frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico

    Eduardo Pineda;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Negative Impacts of Human Land Use on Dung Beetle Functional Diversity

    Felipe Barragán;Claudia E. Moreno;Federico Escobar;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Spatial and temporal analysis of α, β and γ diversities of bats in a fragmented landscape

    Claudia E. Moreno;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Biogeographical and Ecological Factors Affecting the Altitudinal Variation of Mountainous Communities of Coprophagous Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a Comparative Study

    Jorge M. Lobo;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Dung beetles attracted to mammalian herbivore (Alouatta palliata) and omnivore (Nasua narica) dung in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico

    Alejandro Estrada;Gonzalo Halffter;Rosamond Coates-Estrada;Dennis A. Meritt

  • A strategy for measuring landscape biodiversity

    Gonzalo Halffter

  • An analytical review of Halffter's Mexican transition zone, and its relevance for evolutionary biogeography, ecology and biogeographical regionalization.

    Gonzalo Halffter;Juan J. Morrone

  • On the measure of sampling effort used in species accumulation curves

    Claudia E. Moreno;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Altitudinal variation of dung beetle (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) assemblages in the Colombian Andes

    Federico Escobar;Jorge M. Lobo;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Manual para evaluación de la biodiversidad en reservas de la biosfera

    Gonzalo Halffter;Claudia E. Moreno;Eduardo O. Pineda

  • Grazing promotes dung beetle diversity in the xeric landscape of a Mexican Biosphere Reserve

    José R. Verdú;Claudia E. Moreno;Gerardo Sánchez-Rojas;Catherine Numa

  • Gamma diversity: derived from and a determinant of Alpha diversity and Beta diversity. An analysis of three tropical landscapes

    Lucrecia Arellano;Gonzalo Halffter

  • Response of Dung Beetle Diversity to Human–induced Changes in a Tropical Landscape 1

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Jorge Soberón
Jorge Soberón University of Kansas
Jorge M. Lobo
Jorge M. Lobo Spanish National Research Council
José Sarukhán
José Sarukhán National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity
Rodolfo Dirzo
Rodolfo Dirzo Stanford University
Juan J. Morrone
Juan J. Morrone National Autonomous University of Mexico
Héctor T. Arita
Héctor T. Arita National Autonomous University of Mexico
Exequiel Ezcurra
Exequiel Ezcurra University of California, Riverside

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, and pursuing related online degrees can enhance your expertise and job prospects. For instance, combining environmental knowledge with social factors is crucial, making a sociology bachelor degree online a valuable complement to understanding human-environment interactions.

For professionals aiming to advance their careers in academia or leadership within environmental education, exploring advanced degrees such as education doctoral programs without dissertation can offer flexibility and focus on applied skills rather than lengthy research projects.

Additionally, those currently holding an EdS (Education Specialist) degree can consider an efficient pathway through an eds to edd bridge program. This streamlines the transition to a Doctor of Education, enhancing qualifications for leadership roles in environmental policy and programs.

Finally, social work intersects significantly with environmental justice. Prospective students interested in this niche might explore fully funded dsw programs online that support advanced study without financial burden, preparing graduates to advocate for communities affected by environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Gonzalo Halffter

Recently Published Articles