World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
11597
World Ranking
15000
National Ranking
6276

Gilbert J. Cote publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert J. Cote sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 198 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gilbert J. Cote D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilbert J. Cote sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gilbert J. Cote is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on multiple areas within medicine and molecular biology, with particular attention to cancer and endocrinology.

Their recent publications highlight work in thyroid cancer and cancer genomics, including:

  • "Evaluation of Overall Survival in Patients With Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma, 2000-2019" (2020) published in JAMA Oncology
  • "Advances in Targeting RET-Dependent Cancers" (2020) published in Cancer Discovery
  • "Impact of Somatic Mutations on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma" (2022) published in JCO Precision Oncology
  • "Clinical Utility of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Mutations in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma" (2021) published in Thyroid
  • "Hallmarks of RET and Co-occuring Genomic Alterations in RET-aberrant Cancers" (2021) published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Their frequent co-authors include Ramona Dadu, Maria E. Cabanillas, Mark Zafereo, Naifa L. Busaidy, and Jennifer Wang. These collaborators have contributed to several publications alongside Cote.

Gilbert J. Cote has published repeatedly in several academic venues, notably:

  • Endocrine Related Cancer
  • JAMA Oncology
  • Cancer Discovery
  • JCO Precision Oncology
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

The main fields of study for their research encompass Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Specific subfields include Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Cancer Research, Genetics, and Oncology.

Their principal research topics cover areas such as:

  • Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Best Publications

  • The relationship between specific RET proto-oncogene mutations and disease phenotype in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. International RET mutation consortium analysis.

    Charis Eng;Charis Eng;David Clayton;Isabelle Schuffenecker;Gilbert Lenoir

  • Exon definition may facilitate splice site selection in RNAs with multiple exons.

    Barbara L. Robberson;Gilbert J. Cote;Susan M. Berget

  • Mutations in the sulfonylurea receptor gene in familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy

    Pamela M. Thomas;Gilbert J. Cote;Nelson Wohllk;Bassem Haddad

  • A point mutation inactivating the sulfonylurea receptor causes the severe form of persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy in Finland.

    Timo Otonkoski;Carina Ämmälä;Hanna Huopio;Hanna Huopio;Gilbert J. Cote

  • Clinical risk factors for malignancy and overall survival in patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas: Primary tumor size and primary tumor location as prognostic indicators

    Montserrat Ayala-Ramirez;Lei Feng;Marcella M. Johnson;Shamim Ejaz

  • RET proto-oncogene: a review and update of genotype-phenotype correlations in hereditary medullary thyroid cancer and associated endocrine tumors.

    Maria A. Kouvaraki;Suzanne E. Shapiro;Nancy D. Perrier;Gilbert J. Cote

  • Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/akt and ras/raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mutations in anaplastic thyroid cancer.

    Libero Santarpia;Adel K. El-Naggar;Gilbert J. Cote;Jeffrey N. Myers

  • Relevance of RET proto-oncogene mutations in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma.

    N. Wohllk;G. J. Cote;M. M. J. Bugalho;N. Ordonez

  • EGFR-Induced and PKCε Monoubiquitylation-Dependent NF-κB Activation Upregulates PKM2 Expression and Promotes Tumorigenesis

    Weiwei Yang;Yan Xia;Yu Cao;Yanhua Zheng

  • Increased bone mass is an unexpected phenotype associated with deletion of the calcitonin gene

    Ana O. Hoff;Philip Catala-Lehnen;Pamela M. Thomas;Matthias Priemel

  • Arthritic calcitonin/α calcitonin gene-related peptide knockout mice have reduced nociceptive hypersensitivity

    Liping Zhang;Ana O. Hoff;Sunil J. Wimalawansa;Gilbert J. Cote

  • Management of pancreatic endocrine tumors in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

    Maria A. Kouvaraki;Suzanne E. Shapiro;Gilbert Cote;Jeffrey E Lee

  • Review: Should patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas be screened for hereditary syndromes?

    Camilo Jiménez;Gilbert Cote;Andrew Arnold;Robert F. Gagel

  • PTEN, NHERF1 and PHLPP form a tumor suppressor network that is disabled in glioblastoma.

    Jennifer R. Molina;Nitin K. Agarwal;Fabiana C. Morales;Yuho Hayashi

  • Genotype-phenotype analysis in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

    Maria A. Kouvaraki;Jeffrey E. Lee;Suzanne E. Shapiro;Robert F. Gagel

  • A splicing switch from ketohexokinase-C to ketohexokinase-A drives hepatocellular carcinoma formation

    Xinjian Li;Xu Qian;Li Xia Peng;Yuhui Jiang;Yuhui Jiang

  • Patterns of Treatment Failure in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma.

    Sarika N. Rao;Mark Zafereo;Ramona Dadu;Naifa L. Busaidy

  • Splicing factors PTBP1 and PTBP2 promote proliferation and migration of glioma cell lines

    Hannah C. Cheung;Tao Hai;Wen Zhu;Keith A. Baggerly

  • Advances in Targeting RET-Dependent Cancers.

    Vivek Subbiah;Gilbert J. Cote

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-1 α-Exon Exclusion and Polypyrimidine Tract-binding Protein in Glioblastoma Multiforme Tumors

    Wei Jin;Ian E. McCutcheon;Gregory N. Fuller;Eileen S.C. Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Gagel
Robert F. Gagel The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Douglas B. Evans
Douglas B. Evans Medical College of Wisconsin
Steven I. Sherman
Steven I. Sherman The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jeffrey E. Lee
Jeffrey E. Lee The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Wei Jin
Wei Jin Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Zhimin Lu
Zhimin Lu Zhejiang University
Jeffrey N. Myers
Jeffrey N. Myers The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Charles Lu
Charles Lu The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Erich M. Sturgis
Erich M. Sturgis Baylor College of Medicine
Ralf Krahe
Ralf Krahe The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse careers in research, education, and healthcare. Many graduates also pursue specialized roles where medical and data knowledge overlap—such as health information management or medical coding.

For those interested in the medical data field, understanding the differences between ccs certification and other credentials is crucial. Certification choices can impact both your job prospects and earning potential.

Careers like medical coding are popular for their flexibility and remote work opportunities. If you’re curious about how much does a medical coder make, you’ll find that salaries vary by experience, certification, and location.

The career outlook is positive, but you may wonder, is medical coding a dying career? Industry trends show that as healthcare systems become more digital, demand for skilled professionals remains steady.

If you want a flexible, affordable start in this field, consider earning your degree remotely. Several of the online health information management degree programs offer both convenience and solid career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Gilbert J. Cote

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles