World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
34
Citations
2894
World Ranking
2950
National Ranking
106

Giacomo Falcucci publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giacomo Falcucci sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 139 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Giacomo Falcucci D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giacomo Falcucci sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A small-scale CAES (compressed air energy storage) system for stand-alone renewable energy power plant for a radio base station: A sizing-design methodology

    E. Jannelli;M. Minutillo;A. Lubrano Lavadera;G. Falcucci

  • Extreme flow simulations reveal skeletal adaptations of deep-sea sponges.

    Giacomo Falcucci;Giacomo Falcucci;Giorgio Amati;Pierluigi Fanelli;Vesselin K. Krastev

  • Lattice Boltzmann Models with Mid-Range Interactions

    Giacomo Falcucci;Gino Bella;Giancarlo Shiatti;Sergio Chibbaro

  • Lattice Boltzmann simulations of phase-separating flows at large density ratios: the case of doubly-attractive pseudo-potentials

    Giacomo Falcucci;Stefano Ubertini;Sauro Succi

  • Mesoscopic simulation of non-ideal fluids with self-tuning of the equation of state

    Carlos E. Colosqui;Giacomo Falcucci;Stefano Ubertini;Sauro Succi

  • Regularized lattice Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model for two- and three-dimensional cavity flow simulations.

    A. Montessori;G. Falcucci;P. Prestininzi;M. La Rocca

  • Low pH, high salinity: Too much for microbial fuel cells?

    Nicole Jannelli;Rosa Anna Nastro;Viviana Cigolotti;Mariagiovanna Minutillo

  • Transverse harmonic oscillations of laminae in viscous fluids: a lattice Boltzmann study

    Giacomo Falcucci;Matteo Aureli;Stefano Ubertini;Maurizio Porfiri

  • Lattice Boltzmann Methods for Multiphase Flow Simulations across Scales

    Giacomo Falcucci;Stefano Ubertini;Chiara Biscarini;Silvia Di Francesco

  • Hydroelastic analysis of hull slamming coupling lattice Boltzmann and finite element methods

    Alessandro De Rosis;Giacomo Falcucci;Maurizio Porfiri;Francesco Ubertini

  • Aeroelastic study of flexible flapping wings by a coupled lattice Boltzmann-finite element approach with immersed boundary method

    Alessandro De Rosis;Giacomo Falcucci;Stefano Ubertini;Francesco Ubertini

  • Direct numerical evidence of stress-induced cavitation

    G. Falcucci;E. Jannelli;S. Ubertini;S. Succi

  • Thermodynamic performance assessment of a small size CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) system with numerical models

    E. Jannelli;M. Minutillo;R. Cozzolino;G. Falcucci

  • A coupled lattice Boltzmann-finite element approach for two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction

    Alessandro De Rosis;Giacomo Falcucci;Stefano Ubertini;Francesco Ubertini

  • Towards Exascale Lattice Boltzmann computing

    S. Succi;S. Succi;G. Amati;M. Bernaschi;G. Falcucci;G. Falcucci

  • 3D CFD modeling and experimental characterization of HT PEM fuel cells at different anode gas compositions

    Vesselin Krassimirov Krastev;Giacomo Falcucci;Elio Jannelli;Mariagiovanna Minutillo

  • Experimental characterization of oblique and asymmetric water entry

    Simonluca Russo;Simonluca Russo;Mohammad Jalalisendi;Giacomo Falcucci;Giacomo Falcucci;Maurizio Porfiri

  • Mapping reactive flow patterns in monolithic nanoporous catalysts

    Giacomo Falcucci;Giacomo Falcucci;Sauro Succi;Andrea Montessori;Simone Melchionna

  • Effects of Knudsen diffusivity on the effective reactivity of nanoporous catalyst media

    A. Montessori;P. Prestininzi;M. La Rocca;G. Falcucci

  • On the effects of membrane viscosity on transient red blood cell dynamics

    F. Guglietta;F. Guglietta;F. Guglietta;M. Behr;L. Biferale;G. Falcucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Sauro Succi
Sauro Succi Italian Institute of Technology
Stefano Ubertini
Stefano Ubertini Tuscia University
Elio Jannelli
Elio Jannelli Parthenope University of Naples
Mariagiovanna Minutillo
Mariagiovanna Minutillo University of Salerno
Maurizio Porfiri
Maurizio Porfiri New York University
Marek Behr
Marek Behr RWTH Aachen University
Efthimios Kaxiras
Efthimios Kaxiras Harvard University
Marco Guida
Marco Guida University of Naples Federico II
Raffaele Cioffi
Raffaele Cioffi Parthenope University of Naples

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA offers dynamic career opportunities, it's beneficial to explore related fields that complement these disciplines. Many students consider interdisciplinary paths, including areas like counseling and speech-language pathology, which can provide unique insights into human factors and communication within engineering projects.

If you're interested in expanding your skill set in mental health support or human behavior, exploring easy counseling degree programs online might be a practical option. These programs offer flexible learning suited to busy schedules, often allowing professionals to pivot or enhance their expertise.

For those focused on specialization with a quicker academic timeline, the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis offer accelerated study paths. This can be particularly valuable for engineers aiming to integrate behavioral insights into design or user experience.

Understanding the academic landscape is crucial if considering speech pathology as a complementary career route. Knowing speech pathology grad school acceptance rates can help you make informed decisions about program applications and expectations.

Additionally, reviewing speech-language pathology graduate programs by state provides insight into where and how you can access these programs, tailoring your educational journey to your geographic preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Giacomo Falcucci

Recently Published Articles