World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gerard J. M. Smit

Gerard J. M. Smit

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6342
World Ranking
10205
National Ranking
184

Gerard J. M. Smit publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard J. M. Smit sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 257 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gerard J. M. Smit D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerard J. M. Smit sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerard J. M. Smit is a researcher affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their work spans multiple fields of study including engineering and energy, with a focus on electrical and electronic engineering, renewable energy, sustainability and the environment, and automotive engineering.

Their research primarily concentrates on advanced battery technologies and electrocatalysts for energy conversion. These topics have been extensively covered throughout their publications and contribute to the understanding of sustainable energy solutions.

Gerard J. M. Smit has published research in the journal Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. One of the recent papers authored, published in 2020, is titled Influence of co-depositor materials and modification of substrate on the formation of dendrites on the anode of a zinc-based secondary battery.

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Bart Homan
  • Diego Fernando Quintero Pulido
  • Marnix V. ten Kortenaar
  • Johann L. Hurink

Their research has contributed to the development of understanding within the subfields such as electrical and electronic engineering and renewable energy, with particular attention to automotive engineering applications.

Research topics associated with Gerard J. M. Smit include:

  • Advanced battery technologies research
  • Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Advanced Battery Technologies Research

Publication venues reflect a specialization in sustainable energy technologies, marking their contributions as part of ongoing research efforts in this area.

Best Publications

  • Management and Control of Domestic Smart Grid Technology

    A Molderink;V Bakker;M G C Bosman;J L Hurink

  • An energy-efficient reconfigurable circuit-switched network-on-chip

    P.T. Wolkotte;G.J.M. Smit;G.K. Rauwerda;L.T. Smit

  • Energy-efficient TDMA medium access control protocol scheduling

    Paul J.M. Havinga;Gerard J.M. Smit

  • Energy‐efficient wireless networking for multimedia applications

    Paul J.M. Havinga;Gerardus Johannes Maria Smit

  • Design techniques for low-power systems

    Paul J.M. Havinga;Gerard J.M. Smit

  • A Flexible and Energy-Efficient Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Architecture for Mobile Systems

    Paul Heysters;Gerard Smit;Egbert Molenkamp

  • Fast, Accurate and Detailed NoC Simulations

    P.T. Wolkotte;P.K.F. Holzenspies;G.J.M. Smit

  • A virtual channel router for on-chip networks

    N.K. Kavaldjiev;G.J.M. Smit;P.G. Jansen

  • Efficient Computation of Buffer Capacities for Cyclo-Static Dataflow Graphs

    Unknown

  • A virtual channel router for on-chip networks

    N. Kavaldjiev;G.J.M. Smit;P.G. Jansen

  • Modelling run-time arbitration by latency-rate servers in dataflow graphs

    Maarten H. Wiggers;Marco J. G. Bekooij;Gerard J. M. Smit

  • Energy Model of Networks-on-Chip and a Bus

    P.T. Wolkotte;G.J.M. Smit;N. Kavaldjiev;J.E. Becker

  • Run-time Mapping of Applications to a Heterogeneous SoC

    L.T. Smit;J.L. Hurink;G.J.M. Smit

  • Run-time spatial mapping of streaming applications to a heterogeneous multi-processor system-on-chip (MPSoC)

    Philip K. F. Hölzenspies;Johann L. Hurink;Jan Kuper;Gerard J. M. Smit

  • Towards Software Defined Radios Using Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Hardware

    G.K. Rauwerda;P.M. Heysters;G.J.M. Smit

  • Mapping of DSP Algorithms on Field Programmable Function Arrays

    Paul M. Heysters;Jaap Smit;Gerard J. M. Smit;Paul J. M. Havinga

  • An Energy and Performance Exploration of Network-on-Chip Architectures

    A. Banerjee;P.T. Wolkotte;R.D. Mullins;S.W. Moore

  • Dynamic Reconfiguration in Mobile Systems

    Gerard J. M. Smit;Paul J. M. Havinga;Lodewijk T. Smit;Paul M. Heysters

  • Mobile Multimedia Systems

    Paul Johannes Mattheus Havinga

  • A graph covering algorithm for a coarse grain reconfigurable system

    Yuanqing Guo;Gerard J.M. Smit;Hajo Broersma;Paul M. Heysters

  • Efficient computation of buffer capacities for multi-rate real-time systems with back-pressure

    Marco Bekooij;Gerard Smit;Pierre Jansen;Maarten Wiggers

  • Generation of flexible domestic load profiles to evaluate Demand Side Management approaches

    Gerwin Hoogsteen;Albert Molderink;Johann L. Hurink;Gerard. J.M. Smit

  • On simulating the effect on the energy efficiency of smart grid technologies

    Albert Molderink;Maurice G. C. Bosman;Vincent Bakker;Johann L. Hurink

  • A market-based framework for demand side flexibility scheduling and dispatching

    Shahab Shariat Torbaghan;Niels Blaauwbroek;Dirk Kuiken;Madeleine Gibescu

  • Run-time mapping of applications to a heterogeneous reconfigurable tiled system on chip architecture

    L.T. Smit;G.J.M. Smit;J.L. Hurink;H. Broersma

  • Monotonicity and run-time scheduling

    Maarten H. Wiggers;Marco J.G. Bekooij;Gerard J.M. Smit

  • Efficient Computation of Buffer Capacities for Cyclo-Static Real-Time Systems with Back-Pressure

    M.H. Wiggers;M.J.G. Bekooij;P.G. Jansen;G.J.M. Smit

Frequent Co-Authors

Johann L. Hurink
Johann L. Hurink University of Twente
Hajo Broersma
Hajo Broersma University of Twente
Paul J.M. Havinga
Paul J.M. Havinga University of Twente
Gerhard J. Woeginger
Gerhard J. Woeginger RWTH Aachen University
Daniël Paulusma
Daniël Paulusma Durham University
Thomas F. Edgar
Thomas F. Edgar The University of Texas at Austin
Madeleine Gibescu
Madeleine Gibescu Utrecht University
Nirvana Meratnia
Nirvana Meratnia University of Twente
Phuong H. Nguyen
Phuong H. Nguyen Eindhoven University of Technology
Michael Baldea
Michael Baldea The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science career options? Today, many learners start with an online associate's degree to quickly enter tech fields or transfer to a bachelor’s program. For those already holding an undergraduate degree, pursuing the fastest masters degree online can accelerate your pathway to specialized roles in areas like data science, cybersecurity, or software engineering.

If you’re aiming for the best return on your education investment, choosing which master's degree is most in demand in usa can help you align your studies with high-growth industries. Additionally, cost is a big concern for many students. Choosing from cheap online colleges allows you to gain valuable qualifications without overwhelming debt.

Whether you are just starting out or looking to advance your career, a wide range of affordable, flexible online programs makes computer science education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Gerard J. M. Smit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles