World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6374 2265 95 7182

G. M. Purdy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. M. Purdy between 1973 and 2011, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. M. Purdy published across 39 years, from 1973 to 2011, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1993. 1 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2011. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1993. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication
1973 2011

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. M. Purdy: publications per year, 1973 to 2011
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 0
1978 3
1979 8
1980 3
1981 2
1982 7
1983 3
1984 3
1985 5
1986 6
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 7
1991 3
1992 8
1993 9
1994 6
1995 3
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
Total 99
Download as CSV

G. M. Purdy publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. M. Purdy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 95 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 95
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

G. M. Purdy D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. M. Purdy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2006 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

G. M. Purdy is affiliated with the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in the United States. Their professional profile reflects a career situated within this prominent research organization.

The scientist has been recognized with notable awards in their field. These include being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2007 and a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2006.

While the record does not list specific publications, coauthors, or detailed fields of study, the affiliations and awards highlight a professional engagement in scientific research, likely related to oceanography or geophysical studies.

Best Publications

  • Evidence from gravity data for focused magmatic accretion along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

    John Lin;G. M. Purdy;H. Schouten;J.-C. Sempere

  • The three-dimensional seismic velocity structure of the East Pacific Rise near latitude 9° 30′ N

    Douglas R. Toomey;Douglas R. Toomey;G. M. Purdy;Sean C. Solomon;William S. D. Wilcock

  • Arc-Continent Collision in Banda Sea Region

    Carl Bowin;G. M. Purdy;Chris Johnston;George Shor

  • Tomographic imaging of the shallow crustal structure of the East Pacific Rise at 9°30′N

    Douglas R. Toomey;Sean C. Solomon;G. M. Purdy

  • Microearthquakes beneath the Median Valley of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge near 23°N: Hypocenters and focal mechanisms

    Douglas R. Toomey;Sean C. Solomon;G. M. Purdy;Mark H. Murray

  • Segmentation of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge between 24° N and 30°40' N

    Jean-Christophe Sempéré;G. M. Purdy;Hans Schouten

  • Crustal structure of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 23°N from seismic refraction studies

    G. M. Purdy;Robert S. Detrick

  • The crustal structure of the kane fracture zone from seismic refraction studies

    Robert S. Detrick;G. M. Purdy

  • Microearthquake Characteristics of a Mid-Ocean Ridge along-axis high

    Laura S. L. Kong;Sean C. Solomon;G. M. Purdy

  • Microearthquakes beneath Median Valley of Mid-Atlantic Ridge near 23°N: Tomography and tectonics

    Douglas R. Toomey;Sean C. Solomon;G. M. Purdy

  • Segmentation and morphotectonic variations along a slow-spreading center: The Mid-Atlantic Ridge (24°00′ N– 30°40′ N)

    Jean-Christophe Sempéré;Jian Lin;Holly S. Brown;Hans Schouten

  • Relationship between spreading rate and the seismic structure of mid-ocean ridges

    G. M. Purdy;L. S.L. Kong;Gail L Christeson;S. C. Solomon

  • Crustal structure of North Atlantic Fracture Zones

    R. S. Detrick;R. S. White;G. M. Purdy

  • Bathymetry of the mid-atlantic ridge, 24°-31°N: A map series

    G. M. Purdy;J. C. Sempere;H. Schouten;D. L. Dubois

  • Deep structure of the U.S. Atlantic continental margin, offshore South Carolina, from coincident ocean bottom and multichannel seismic data

    W. Steven Holbrook;E. C. Reiter;G. M. Purdy;D. Sawyer

  • Microearthquake characteristics and crustal velocity structure at 29°N on the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge: The architecture of a slow spreading segment

    Cecily J. Wolfe;G. M. Purdy;Douglas R. Toomey;Sean C. Solomon

  • Seismic constraints on shallow crustal emplacement processes at the fast spreading East Pacific Rise

    G. L. Christeson;G. M. Purdy;G. J. Fryer

  • Seismic structure of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic continental margin

    W. Steven Holbrook;G. M. Purdy;R. E. Sheridan;L. Glover

  • Structure of young upper crust at the East Pacific Rise near 9°30'N

    Gail L Christeson;G. M. Purdy;G. J. Fryer

  • The Eastern End of the Azores-Gibraltar Plate Boundary

    Unknown

  • Deep seismic reflection data of EDGE U.S. mid-Atlantic continental-margin experiment: Implications for Appalachian sutures and Mesozoic rifting and magmatic underplating

    Robert E. Sheridan;Douglas L. Musser;Lynn Glover;Manik Talwani

Frequent Co-Authors

Sean C. Solomon
Sean C. Solomon Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Douglas R. Toomey
Douglas R. Toomey University of Oregon
William S. D. Wilcock
William S. D. Wilcock University of Washington
Gail L. Christeson
Gail L. Christeson The University of Texas at Austin
W. Steven Holbrook
W. Steven Holbrook Virginia Tech
Hans Schouten
Hans Schouten Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Manik Talwani
Manik Talwani Rice University
Robert S. Detrick
Robert S. Detrick Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Paul L. Stoffa
Paul L. Stoffa The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Earth Science, pursuing related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Individuals from various backgrounds, including veterans, may find tailored programs that suit their unique needs. For example, some of the best military friendly online spanish degrees offer flexible scheduling and support services ideal for transitioning service members interested in language skills alongside environmental studies.

Creative professionals might explore interdisciplinary opportunities by combining Earth Science with arts through mfa online programs. These programs help develop communication and visualization skills useful in scientific outreach and environmental advocacy.

For those aiming to move into leadership or administrative roles within environmental organizations, pursuing an online masters in human resource management can provide essential management skills to complement scientific expertise.

Online education also makes it easier for older adults who want to re-skill or pursue new interests. Many college degrees for seniors provide flexible, supportive learning environments, allowing mature students to engage in Earth Science and related disciplines at their own pace.

Best Scientists Citing G. M. Purdy