World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
G. Guilbaud

G. Guilbaud

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 68 2808 95 175 12552

G. Guilbaud publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. Guilbaud between 1972 and 2001, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. Guilbaud published across 30 years, from 1972 to 2001, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1990. 5 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2001. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1990. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 5 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 12 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 12 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications
1972 2001

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. Guilbaud: publications per year, 1972 to 2001
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 3
1974 1
1975 5
1976 2
1977 5
1978 0
1979 2
1980 6
1981 4
1982 4
1983 8
1984 12
1985 7
1986 8
1987 12
1988 5
1989 8
1990 15
1991 10
1992 6
1993 10
1994 5
1995 9
1996 6
1997 5
1998 5
1999 7
2000 3
2001 2
Total 176
Download as CSV

G. Guilbaud publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Guilbaud sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 175 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 175
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

G. Guilbaud D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Guilbaud sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250 68
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

G. Guilbaud was a researcher affiliated with Inserm in France. Their career was marked by contributions within the realm of academic research tied to this institution.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers authored by G. Guilbaud, and frequently collaborating co-authors have not been documented. Information about specific publication venues commonly used by this researcher is also not on record.

The scientific contributions of G. Guilbaud do not list designated main fields of study, subfields, or particular topical focuses. Similarly, no information is recorded regarding book publications or awards received during their career.

G. Guilbaud is recorded as deceased, with details surrounding the timeline of their work reflecting historical contributions rather than ongoing research activities.

Best Publications

  • Further evidence for ‘pain-related’ behaviours in a model of unilateral peripheral mononeuropathy

    N. Attal;F. Jazat;V. Kayser;G. Guilbaud

  • Analgesia from electrical stimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter in the cat: behavioral observations and inhibitory effects on spinal cord interneurons.

    Unknown

  • Analgesia Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Inferior Centralis Nucleus of the Raphe in the Cat

    J L Oliveras;F Redjemi;G Guilbaud;J M Besson

  • The spectrum of fiber loss in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat: an electron microscopic study

    Basbaum Ai;Gautron M;Jazat F;Mayes M

  • Opiate antagonist, naloxone, strongly reduces analgesia induced by stimulation of a raphe nucleus (centralis inferior)

    J.L. Oliveras;Y. Hosobuchi;F. Redjemi;G. Guilbaud

  • Neurones responding to noxious stimulation in VB complex and caudal adjacent regions in the thalamus of the rat.

    G. Guilbaud;M. Peschanski;M. Gautron;D. Binder

  • Differential effects of morphine on responses of dorsal horn lamina V type cells elicited by A and C fibre stimulation in the spinal cat

    D. Le Bars;G. Guilbaud;I. Jurna;J.M. Besson

  • Local and remote modifications of nociceptive sensitivity during carrageenin-induced inflammation in the rat.

    V. Kayser;G. Guilbaud

  • Effects induced by stimulation of the centralis inferior nucleus of the raphe on dorsal horn interneurons in cat's spinal cord

    G. Guilbaud;J.L. Oliveras;G. Giesler;J.M. Besson

  • A map of serotoninergic structures involved in stimulation producing analgesia in unrestrained freely moving cats

    Jean Louis Oliveras;Gisèle Guilbaud;Jean Marie Besson

  • Neuronal responsiveness in the ventrobasal thalamic complex of rats with an experimental peripheral mononeuropathy.

    G. Guilbaud;J. M. Benoist;F. Jazat;M. Gautron

  • The analgesic effects of morphine, but not those of the enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan, are enhanced in arthritic rats

    Vale´rie Kayser;Gise`le Guilbaud

  • Dose-dependent analgesic and hyperalgesic effects of systemic naloxone in arthritic rats.

    Valérie Kayser;Gise`le Guilbaud

  • Lumbar cord neurons at the origin of the spinothalamic tract in the rat.

    Glenn J. Giesler;Daniel Menétrey;Giséle Guilbaud;Jean Marie Besson

  • Antinociceptive effects of acute and 'chronic' injections of tricyclic antidepressant drugs in a new model of mononeuropathy in rats.

    D. Ardid;G. Guilbaud

  • Posterior intralaminar region in rat: Neuronal responses to noxious and nonnoxious cutaneous stimuli

    Marc Peschanski;Gisèle Guilbaud;Michèle Gautron

  • Pharmacological studies on a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain: baclofen, but not carbamazepine, morphine or tricyclic antidepressants, attenuates the allodynia-like behaviour

    Juhana J Idänpään-Heikkilä;Gisèle Guilbaud

  • Estrous and sex variations in vocalization thresholds to hindpaw and tail pressure stimulation in the rat

    Valérie Kayser;Karen J Berkley;Hawa Keita;Michèle Gautron

  • Nociceptive responses in medial thalamus of the normal and arthritic rat.

    Jonathan O. Dostrovsky;Gisele Guilbaud

  • Rat somatosensory (SmI) cortex: I. Characteristics of neuronal responses to noxious stimulation and comparison with responses to non-noxious stimulation

    Y. Lamour;J. C. Willer;G. Guilbaud

  • Evidence for a noradrenergic component in the antinociceptive effect of the analgesic agent tramadol in an animal model of clinical pain, the arthritic rat.

    Valérie Kayser;Jean-Marie Besson;Gisèle Guilbaud

Frequent Co-Authors

Nadine Attal
Nadine Attal Grenoble Alpes University
David F. Fletcher
David F. Fletcher University of Sydney
Yvon Lamour
Yvon Lamour Grenoble Alpes University
Jean-Claude Willer
Jean-Claude Willer Sorbonne University
Marc Peschanski
Marc Peschanski Grenoble Alpes University
D. Le Bars
D. Le Bars Grenoble Alpes University
Allan I. Basbaum
Allan I. Basbaum University of California, San Francisco
Bernard-Pierre Roques
Bernard-Pierre Roques Grenoble Alpes University
Yves Agid
Yves Agid Institut du Cerveau
Marie-Claude Fournie-Zaluski
Marie-Claude Fournie-Zaluski Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career paths. For those looking to quickly upskill or specialize, online certificate programs can provide valuable credentials that lead to well-paying jobs in healthcare, research, and education.

If you prefer a more flexible entry point, it’s worth considering one of the easiest online degree options. These programs can help you build foundational knowledge before moving on to advanced neuroscience or health-related study.

For those drawn to social work or mental health, affordable msw programs online are available, allowing you to prepare for licensure and clinical roles without large financial burdens.

Another promising path is pursuing certification in behavior analysis. There are many bcba programs that suit students interested in clinical intervention and developmental neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing G. Guilbaud

Recently Published Articles