World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jean-François Bernard

Jean-François Bernard

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
7638
World Ranking
8490
National Ranking
399

Jean-François Bernard publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-François Bernard sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jean-François Bernard D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-François Bernard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-François Bernard is affiliated with Grenoble Alpes University in France. Their recent research contributions focus on the structural elements of ancient architecture, as reflected in the specific study of stone frameworks.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • Les charpentes en pierre de Délos (2023), Bulletin archéologique des Écoles françaises à l'étranger
  • Les charpentes en pierre de Délos (2022), Bulletin archéologique des Écoles françaises à l'étranger

These publications were both featured in the Bulletin archéologique des Écoles françaises à l'étranger, which is the primary venue for their dissemination of research findings.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jean-François Bernard include:

  • Stéphane Lamouille
  • Véronique Picard

The collaboration with these co-authors appears in multiple works, indicating ongoing research partnerships within their field of study.

Best Publications

  • Pain Pathways and Parabrachial Circuits in the Rat

    Caroline Gauriau;Jean-François Bernard

  • The spino(trigemino)pontoamygdaloid pathway: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes.

    J. F. Bernard;J. M. Besson

  • Nucleus centralis of the amygdala and the globus pallidus ventralis: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes

    J. F. Bernard;G. F. Huang;J. M. Besson

  • Involvement of the spino-parabrachio -amygdaloid and -hypothalamic pathways in the autonomic and affective emotional aspects of pain.

    J.F. Bernard;H. Bester;J.M. Besson

  • Conditional anterograde tracing reveals distinct targeting of individual serotonin cell groups (B5–B9) to the forebrain and brainstem

    Aude Muzerelle;Aude Muzerelle;Sophie Scotto-Lomassese;Sophie Scotto-Lomassese;Jean François Bernard;Mariano Soiza-Reilly;Mariano Soiza-Reilly

  • Physiological properties of the lamina I spinoparabrachial neurons in the rat.

    Hervé Bester;Victoria Chapman;Jean-Marie Besson;Jean-François Bernard

  • Organization of efferent projections from the parabrachial area to the hypothalamus: a Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin study in the rat.

    Hervé Bester;Jean‐Marie Besson;Jean‐François Bernard

  • The parabrachial area: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in visceral nociceptive processes

    J. F. Bernard;G. F. Huang;J. M. Besson

  • Organization of the efferent projections from the spinal cervical enlargement to the parabrachial area and periaqueductal gray: a PHA-L study in the rat.

    Jean‐Franiçois Bernard;Radhouane Dallel;Patrick Raboisson;Luis Villanueva

  • A comparative reappraisal of projections from the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn in the rat: the forebrain.

    Caroline Gauriau;Jean-François Bernard

  • Organization of the efferent projections from the pontine parabrachial area to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and neighboring regions: a PHA-L study in the rat.

    Marie Alden;Jean‐Marie Besson;Jean‐François Bernard

  • A possible spino (trigemino)-ponto-amygdaloid pathway for pain

    J.F. Bernard;M. Peschanski;J.M. Besson

  • Projections from the nociceptive area of the central nucleus of the amygdala to the forebrain: a PHA‐L study in the rat

    Laurence Bourgeais;Caroline Gauriau;Jean‐François Bernard

  • Chemical neuroanatomy of the dorsal raphe nucleus and adjacent structures of the mouse brain.

    Wenyu Fu;Erwan Le Maître;Veronique Fabre;Jean-Francois Bernard

  • Spino (trigemino) parabrachiohypothalamic pathway: electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in pain processes.

    H. Bester;L. Menendez;J. M. Besson;J. F. Bernard

  • Parallel circuits for emotional coping behaviour: new pieces in the puzzle.

    Jean François Bernard;Richard Bandler;Richard Bandler

  • Posterior Triangular Thalamic Neurons Convey Nociceptive Messages to the Secondary Somatosensory and Insular Cortices in the Rat

    Caroline Gauriau;Jean-François Bernard

  • Differential projections to the intralaminar and gustatory thalamus from the parabrachial area: a PHA-L study in the rat.

    Hervé Bester;Laurence Bourgeais;Luis Villanueva;Jean‐Marie Besson

  • Further evidence for the involvement of the spinoparabrachial pathway in nociceptive processes: a c-Fos study in the rat.

    Hervé Bester;Norio Matsumoto;Jean‐Marie Besson;Jean‐François Bernard

  • Topographical organization of olivocerebellar and corticonuclear connections in the rat--an WGA-HRP study: I. Lobules IX, X, and the flocculus.

    Jean‐François Bernard

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Hamon
Michel Hamon Université Paris Cité
Jean-Marie Besson
Jean-Marie Besson Grenoble Alpes University
Luis Villanueva
Luis Villanueva Grenoble Alpes University
Daniel Le Bars
Daniel Le Bars Sorbonne University
Marc Peschanski
Marc Peschanski Grenoble Alpes University
D. Le Bars
D. Le Bars Grenoble Alpes University
Pierre Fenaux
Pierre Fenaux Université Paris Cité
Tomas Hökfelt
Tomas Hökfelt Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean-François Bernard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles