World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick M. Cohan

Frederick M. Cohan

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
11630
World Ranking
17901
National Ranking
7325

Frederick M. Cohan publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick M. Cohan sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 109 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Frederick M. Cohan D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick M. Cohan sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick M. Cohan is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as environmental science. The subfields they focus on include molecular biology, ecology, genetics, pollution, and environmental chemistry.

The main topics covered by their research are:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Bacteriophages and Microbial Interactions
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Microbial Infections and Disease Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Frederick M. Cohan and colleagues include:

  • "Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes" (2020) published in Environmental Microbiology
  • "Broadscale phage therapy is unlikely to select for widespread evolution of bacterial resistance to virus infection" (2020) published in Virus Evolution
  • "Biogeography of American Northwest Hot Spring A/B'-Lineage Synechococcus Populations" (2020) published in Frontiers in Microbiology
  • "Two plant-growth-promoting Bacillus species can utilize nanoplastics" (2023) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Genotyping and Multivariate Regression Trees Reveal Ecological Diversification within the Microcystis aeruginosa Complex along a Wide Environmental Gradient" (2021) published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Frederick M. Cohan frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Virus Evolution
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Their regular collaborators include the following scientists:

  • Fatai A. Olabemiwo
  • Eric D. Becraft
  • Jason M. Wood
  • David M. Ward
  • Chloe De Palo

Best Publications

  • Re-evaluating prokaryotic species

    Dirk Gevers;Frederick M. Cohan;Jeffrey G. Lawrence;Brian G. Spratt

  • What are Bacterial Species

    Frederick M. Cohan

  • Origins of bacterial diversity through horizontal genetic transfer and adaptation to new ecological niches.

    Jane Wiedenbeck;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Discovery and classification of ecological diversity in the bacterial world: the role of DNA sequence data

    Thomas Palys;L. K. Nakamura;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Bacterial Species and Speciation

    Frederick M. Cohan

  • Identifying the fundamental units of bacterial diversity: a paradigm shift to incorporate ecology into bacterial systematics.

    Alexander Koeppel;Elizabeth B. Perry;Johannes Sikorski;Danny Krizanc

  • A Systematics for Discovering the Fundamental Units of Bacterial Diversity

    Frederick M. Cohan;Elizabeth B. Perry

  • Differentiation strategies of soil rare and abundant microbial taxa in response to changing climatic regimes.

    Yuting Liang;Xian Xiao;Erin E. Nuccio;Mengting Yuan

  • Towards a conceptual and operational union of bacterial systematics, ecology, and evolution

    Frederick M Cohan

  • Bacillus mojavensis sp. nov., Distinguishable from Bacillus subtilis by Sexual Isolation, Divergence in DNA Sequence, and Differences in Fatty Acid Composition

    Michael S. Roberts;L. K. Nakamura;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Relationship of Bacillus subtilis clades associated with strains 168 and W23: a proposal for Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis subsp. nov. and Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii subsp. nov.

    L. K. Nakamura;Michael S. Roberts;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Population level functional diversity in a microbial community revealed by comparative genomic and metagenomic analyses

    Devaki Bhaya;Arthur R. Grossman;Anne Soisig Steunou;Natalia Khuri;Natalia Khuri

  • Barriers to Genetic Exchange between Bacterial Species: Streptococcus pneumoniae Transformation

    Jacek Majewski;Piotr Zawadzki;Paul Pickerill;Frederick M. Cohan

  • RECOMBINATION AND MIGRATION RATES IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF BACILLUS SUBTILIS AND BACILLUS MOJAVENSIS.

    Michael S. Roberts;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Cyanobacterial ecotypes in the microbial mat community of Mushroom Spring (Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming) as species-like units linking microbial community composition, structure and function

    D. M. Ward;M. M. Bateson;M. J. Ferris;M. Kuhl

  • The origins of ecological diversity in prokaryotes.

    Frederick M. Cohan;Alexander F. Koeppel

  • The effect of DNA sequence divergence on sexual isolation in Bacillus

    Michael S. Roberts;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Community ecology of hot spring cyanobacterial mats: predominant populations and their functional potential

    Christian G Klatt;Jason M Wood;Douglas B Rusch;Mary M Bateson

  • DNA sequence similarity requirements for interspecific recombination in Bacillus.

    Jacek Majewski;Frederick M. Cohan

  • Bacillus sonorensis sp. nov., a close relative of Bacillus licheniformis, isolated from soil in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona

    Margaret M. Palmisano;L. K. Nakamura;Kathleen E. Duncan;Conrad A. Istock

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Ward
David M. Ward Montana State University
Donald A. Bryant
Donald A. Bryant Pennsylvania State University
Michael Kühl
Michael Kühl University of Copenhagen
Danny Krizanc
Danny Krizanc Wesleyan University
John F. Heidelberg
John F. Heidelberg University of Southern California
Alejandro P. Rooney
Alejandro P. Rooney National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research
Arthur R. Grossman
Arthur R. Grossman Carnegie Institution for Science
Samuel K. Sheppard
Samuel K. Sheppard University of Bath
Jizhong Zhou
Jizhong Zhou University of Oklahoma
David A. Schisler
David A. Schisler National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of rewarding and flexible careers—many of which now offer online learning options. For instance, allied health fields are increasingly accessible; those looking to combine nutritional science with biochemistry may consider an online nutrition degree. These programs provide a fast-track to careers in health and wellness, dietary counseling, or food science.

If you're interested in the business side of healthcare, pursuing an affordable online mba in healthcare management can give you the leadership skills needed to manage health organizations and navigate complex regulations. For those drawn to the technical or administrative aspects, seeking cpc certification is ideal for medical coding specialists and can boost both credibility and earning potential.

As demand rises for healthcare data professionals, learning medical coder salary insights may help you decide if this path aligns with your career goals. Whichever path you choose, online study offers the convenience and flexibility you need to achieve your ambitions in the fast-paced world of science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick M. Cohan

Trending Scientists