World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5541
World Ranking
10318
National Ranking
4326

Danny Krizanc publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny Krizanc sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Danny Krizanc D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny Krizanc sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danny Krizanc is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within computer science and engineering, with a focus on optimization, search problems, modular robotics, distributed systems, and transportation innovations.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Priority evacuation from a disk: The case of n ≥ 4 (2020) published in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Optimal online and offline algorithms for robot-assisted restoration of barrier coverage (2020) published in Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Optimal rendezvous on a line by location-aware robots in the presence of spies* (2021) published in Discrete Mathematics Algorithms and Applications
  • Group Evacuation on a Line by Agents with Different Communication Abilities (2021) published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Line Search for an Oblivious Moving Target (2022) published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Krizanc collaborates frequently with several researchers including:

  • Evangelos Kranakis
  • Jared Coleman
  • Jurek Czyzowicz
  • Lata Narayanan
  • Jaroslav Opatrný

Their work appears most often in the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Discrete Applied Mathematics
  • Discrete Mathematics Algorithms and Applications

Krizanc's research fields and subfields indicate a multidisciplinary approach spanning:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Their main topics of study cover:

  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Best Publications

  • Power consumption in packet radio networks

    Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Andrzej Pelc

  • Structural RNA has lower folding energy than random RNA of the same dinucleotide frequency

    Peter Clote;Fabrizio Ferré;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Approximating the unsatisfiability threshold of random formulas

    Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Yannis C. Stamatiou

  • Asynchronous deterministic rendezvous in graphs

    Gianluca De Marco;Luisa Gargano;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Random constraint satisfaction: a more accurate picture

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Efficient Routing in Networks with Long Range Contacts

    Lali Barrière;Pierre Fraigniaud;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Mobile agent rendezvous in a ring

    E. Kranakis;N. Santoro;C. Sawchuk;D. Krizanc

  • Rigorous results for random (2 + p)-SAT

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Fault-Tolerant Broadcasting in Radio Networks

    Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Andrzej Pelc

  • Tight bounds for oblivious routing in the hypercube

    Unknown

  • Multiple Mobile Agent Rendezvous in a Ring

    Paola Flocchini;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Nicola Santoro

  • Mobile agent rendezvous: a survey

    Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Sergio Rajsbaum

  • Directional versus omnidirectional antennas for energy consumption and k -connectivity of networks of sensors

    Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Eric Williams

  • Complexity of barrier coverage with relocatable sensors in the plane

    Stefan Dobrev;Stephane Durocher;Mohsen Eftekhari;Konstantinos Georgiou

  • On minimizing the sum ofensor movements for barrier coverage of a line segment

    Jurek Czyzowicz;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Ioannis Lambadaris

  • Power Consumption in Packet Radio Networks (Extended Abstract)

    Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Andrzej Pelc

  • Revitalizing computing education through free and open source software for humanity

    Ralph Morelli;Allen Tucker;Norman Danner;Trishan R. De Lanerolle

  • Range mode and range median queries on lists and trees

    Danny Krizanc;Pat Morin;Michiel Smid

  • Random Constraint Satisfaction: A More Accurate Picture

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Michael S. O. Molloy;Lefteris M. Kirousis;Yannis C. Stamatiou

  • Randomized rendez-vous with limited memory

    Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Pat Morin

  • On Minimizing the Sum of Sensor Movements for Barrier Coverage of a Line Segment

    Jurek Czyzowicz;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc;Ioannis Lambadaris

Frequent Co-Authors

Evangelos Kranakis
Evangelos Kranakis Carleton University
Pat Morin
Pat Morin Carleton University
Andrzej Pelc
Andrzej Pelc Université du Québec en Outaouais
Frederick M. Cohan
Frederick M. Cohan Wesleyan University
Jorge Urrutia
Jorge Urrutia National Autonomous University of Mexico
Leszek Gasieniec
Leszek Gasieniec University of Liverpool
Rajeev Raman
Rajeev Raman University of Leicester
Nicola Santoro
Nicola Santoro Carleton University
Paola Flocchini
Paola Flocchini University of Ottawa
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and diverse career pathways. For students interested in broader applications of technology, areas like engineering and data analysis are worth exploring. Online programs are especially attractive for their flexibility and growing affordability.

For those passionate about sustainability, several environmental engineering schools online offer accessible ways to build a future in green tech. Students pursuing design and innovation may want to compare mechanical engineering degree cost to find a program that fits their budget.

If your interests are theoretical, you can even earn an online theoretical physics degree to develop fundamental skills for research or academia. Meanwhile, those seeking roles in analytics or AI should look into the cheapest data science degree options, making advanced study more accessible.

Exploring these related fields not only expands your skill set but also enhances employability in today’s tech-driven workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Danny Krizanc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles