World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
19119
World Ranking
2360
National Ranking
94

Frauke Schultze-Lutter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frauke Schultze-Lutter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 368 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frauke Schultze-Lutter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frauke Schultze-Lutter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frauke Schultze-Lutter is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience with an emphasis on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Among frequent coauthors associated with Frauke Schultze-Lutter are Eva Meisenzahl, Stephan Ruhrmann, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Joseph Kambeitz, and Stefan Borgwardt. These collaborations contribute to a rich multidisciplinary network within mental health research.

The scientist has published extensively in several prominent academic outlets. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • European Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Frauke Schultze-Lutter are:

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Predictors of help-seeking behaviour in people with mental health problems: a 3-year prospective community study, 2021, BMC Psychiatry
  • 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses Characterize Circuit Dysfunctions and Predict Clinical Outcomes in Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis Participants: A Magnetoencephalography Study, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • Traces of Trauma: A Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Childhood Trauma, Brain Structure, and Clinical Phenotypes, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Toward Generalizable and Transdiagnostic Tools for Psychosis Prediction: An Independent Validation and Improvement of the NAPLS-2 Risk Calculator in the Multisite PRONIA Cohort, 2021, Biological Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • The Psychosis High-Risk State: A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Stefan Borgwardt;Andreas Bechdolf;Jean Addington

  • Diagnosing schizophrenia in the initial prodromal phase

    Unknown

  • Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study

    Stephan Ruhrmann;Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Raimo K. R. Salokangas;Markus Heinimaa

  • Association between mental health-related stigma and active help-seeking: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • EPA guidance on the early intervention in clinical high risk states of psychoses.

    Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Chantal Michel;Stefanie Julia Schmidt;Benno Karl Edgar Schimmelmann

  • Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions.

    Patrick D. McGorry;Barnaby Nelson;G. Paul Amminger;Andreas Bechdolf

  • Subjective Symptoms of Schizophrenia in Research and the Clinic: The Basic Symptom Concept

    Frauke Schultze-Lutter

  • Prediction Models of Functional Outcomes for Individuals in the Clinical High-Risk State for Psychosis or with Recent-Onset Depression: A Multimodal, Multisite Machine Learning Analysis

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic;Stephan Ruhrmann;Marlene Rosen

  • Prediction of psychosis by mismatch negativity.

    Mitja Bodatsch;Stephan Ruhrmann;Michael Wagner;Ralf Müller

  • Sensory Gating in Schizophrenia: P50 and N100 Gating in Antipsychotic-Free Subjects at Risk, First-Episode, and Chronic Patients

    Anke Brockhaus-Dumke;Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Ralf Mueller;Indira Tendolkar

  • Basic Symptoms and Ultrahigh Risk Criteria: Symptom Development in the Initial Prodromal State

    Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Stephan Ruhrmann;Julia Berning;Wolfgang Maier

  • At risk or not at risk? A meta-analysis of the prognostic accuracy of psychometric interviews for psychosis prediction.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Marco Cappucciati;Grazia Rutigliano;Frauke Schultze-Lutter

  • Developing Psychosis and Its Risk States Through the Lens of Schizotypy

    Martin Debbané;Stéphan Eliez;Deborah Myriam Badoud;Philippe Conus

  • The Dark Side of the Moon: Meta-analytical Impact of Recruitment Strategies on Risk Enrichment in the Clinical High Risk State for Psychosis

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Marco Cappucciati;Grazia Rutigliano

  • Neurocognitive indicators for a conversion to psychosis: comparison of patients in a potentially initial prodromal state who did or did not convert to a psychosis.

    Ralf Pukrop;Stephan Ruhrmann;Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Andreas Bechdolf

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression

    Nikolaos Koutsouleris;Dominic B. Dwyer;Franziska Degenhardt;Franziska Degenhardt;Carlo Maj

  • Anandamide elevation in cerebrospinal fluid in initial prodromal states of psychosis.

    Dagmar Koethe;Andrea Giuffrida;Daniela Schreiber;Daniela Schreiber;Martin Hellmich

  • Basic Symptoms and the Prediction of First-Episode Psychosis

    Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Stephan Ruhrmann;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Andreas Bechdolf

  • Impaired mismatch negativity generation in prodromal subjects and patients with schizophrenia

    Anke Brockhaus-Dumke;Indira Tendolkar;Ralf Pukrop;Frauke Schultze-Lutter

  • Early self-experienced neuropsychological deficits and subsequent schizophrenic diseases: an 8-year average follow-up prospective study

    J. Klosterkötter;F. Schultze-Lutter;G. Gross;G. Huber

  • Neurocognitive Functioning in Subjects at Risk for a First Episode of Psychosis Compared with First- and Multiple-episode Schizophrenia

    Ralf Pukrop;Frauke Schultze-Lutter;Stephan Ruhrmann;Anke Brockhaus-Dumke

  • Acute effects of treatment for prodromal symptoms for people putatively in a late initial prodromal state of psychosis

    Stephan Ruhrmann;Andreas Bechdolf;Kai-Uwe Kühn;Michael Wagner

  • Disability in people clinically at high risk of psychosis

    Eva Velthorst;Dorien H. Nieman;Don Linszen;Hiske Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Joachim Klosterkötter
Joachim Klosterkötter University of Cologne
Stephan Ruhrmann
Stephan Ruhrmann University of Cologne
Ralf Pukrop
Ralf Pukrop University of Cologne
Georg Juckel
Georg Juckel Ruhr University Bochum
Wolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier University of Bonn
Wolfgang Gaebel
Wolfgang Gaebel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Indira Tendolkar
Indira Tendolkar Radboud University
Shôn Lewis
Shôn Lewis University of Manchester
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Anthony P. Morrison
Anthony P. Morrison University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and specialized career opportunities. Many students choose related pathways such as applied behavior analysis (ABA), counseling, or organizational psychology, often combining flexible online learning with in-person experience.

One in-demand career is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The process to how to become a bcba in New Orleans involves earning a graduate degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam. Requirements can vary by location, as outlined in resources like how to become a bcba in New York City and how to become a bcba in Newark. It’s essential to research the local credentials and understand state-specific regulations.

For students interested in online learning, many universities offer accredited programs that meet BCBA requirements. If you’re exploring career advancement or specialization, understanding how to become a bcba in Norfolk can highlight the steps needed in different regions. Each pathway helps prepare you for a fulfilling role supporting individuals’ mental and behavioral health in diverse settings.

Best Scientists Citing Frauke Schultze-Lutter

Trending Scientists