World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fernando Pacheco-Torgal

Fernando Pacheco-Torgal

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
10273
World Ranking
5373
National Ranking
28

Fernando Pacheco-Torgal publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Pacheco-Torgal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Fernando Pacheco-Torgal D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Pacheco-Torgal sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Alkali-activated binders: A review: Part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products

    Fernando Pacheco-Torgal;João Castro-Gomes;Said Jalali

  • Cementitious building materials reinforced with vegetable fibres : a review

    Fernando Pacheco-Torgal;Said Jalali

  • Earth construction: lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Said Jalali

  • Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Said Jalali

  • Reusing ceramic wastes in concrete

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;S. Jalali

  • Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;J. A. Labrincha;C. Leonelli;A. Palomo

  • Properties and durability of concrete containing polymeric wastes (tyre rubber and polyethylene terephthalate bottles): An overview

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Yining Ding;Said Jalali

  • Introduction to Handbook of Alkali-activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes

    F. Pacheco-Torgal

  • Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020

    F. Pacheco-Torgal

  • Handbook of Recycled Concrete and Demolition Waste

    Fernando Pacheco-Torgal;Vivian W. Y Tam;Joao Labrincha;Yining Ding

  • Properties and durability of HPC with tyre rubber wastes

    Francisco de Assis Anjos Azevedo;F. Pacheco-Torgal;Carlos M. G. Jesus;J. L. Barroso de Aguiar

  • Eco-efficient concrete

    F. Pacheco-Torgal

  • An overview on the potential of geopolymers for concrete infrastructure rehabilitation

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Zahra Abdollahnejad;Sérgio Miraldo;S. Baklouti

  • The future of construction materials research and the seventh UN Millennium Development Goal: A few insights

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;J.A. Labrincha

  • Nano-carbon black and carbon fiber as conductive materials for the diagnosing of the damage of concrete beam

    Yining Ding;Zhipei Chen;Zhibo Han;Yulin Zhang

  • Nanotechnology in Eco-Efficient Construction. Materials, Processes and Applications

    F Pacheco-Torgal;M.V. Diamanti;A. Nazari;Claes-Göran Granqvist

  • Investigations on mix design of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder

    Unknown

  • Targeting HPC with the help of nanoparticles: An overview

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Sérgio Miraldo;Yning Ding;J. A. Labrincha

  • Nanotechnology in Eco-Efficient Construction

    F Pacheco-Torgal;M Diamanti;A Nazari;Claes Göran Granqvist

  • Use of Recycled Plastics in Eco-efficient Concrete

    Fernando Pacheco-Torgal;Jamal Khatib;Francesco Colangelo;Rabin Tuladhar

  • Tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder: Preliminary hydration products investigations

    Fernando Pacheco-Torgal;João Castro-Gomes;Said Jalali

  • Some considerations about the use of lime-cement mortars for building conservation purposes in Portugal: A reprehensible option or a lesser evil?

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Joana Faria;Said Jalali

  • Are geopolymers more suitable than Portland cement to produce high volume recycled aggregates HPC

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;Yining Ding;Sérgio Miraldo;Zahra Abdollahnejad

  • Nano and Biotech Based Materials for Energy Building Efficiency

    F. Pacheco-Torgal;C. Buratti;S. Kalaiselvam;Claes Göran Granqvist

Frequent Co-Authors

João A. Labrincha
João A. Labrincha University of Aveiro
Claes-Göran Granqvist
Claes-Göran Granqvist Uppsala University
Prinya Chindaprasirt
Prinya Chindaprasirt Khon Kaen University
Serji N. Amirkhanian
Serji N. Amirkhanian University of Alabama
Ali Nazari
Ali Nazari Swinburne University of Technology
Ángel Palomo
Ángel Palomo Spanish National Research Council
Daniel C.W. Tsang
Daniel C.W. Tsang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Cristina Leonelli
Cristina Leonelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Jay G. Sanjayan
Jay G. Sanjayan Swinburne University of Technology
Caijun Shi
Caijun Shi Hunan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities. For those interested in business operations alongside technical fields, consider pursuing an mba in operations management. This program blends engineering knowledge with business strategy, preparing graduates for leadership positions in manufacturing, logistics, and tech-driven industries.

Flexibility is a key issue for many professionals. Fortunately, you can find an mba online no gmat option that removes the barrier of standardized test requirements, making it easier for working engineers to continue their studies without career interruptions. Budget concerns are also important, so exploring an online mba under $30k can help you advance your education affordably.

In today’s digital world, technical graduates can also broaden their prospects through a social media marketing online degree. This specialized pathway is ideal for those interested in tech-driven marketing roles that bridge creativity, data, and digital communication. By combining engineering skills with business or marketing knowledge, graduates can pursue diverse and in-demand career paths in the modern workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Pacheco-Torgal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles