World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
6700
World Ranking
5099
National Ranking
536

Fang Fang publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fang Fang sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Fang Fang D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fang Fang sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A new absorbent by modifying walnut shell for the removal of anionic dye: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies

    Unknown

  • Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances produced by mixed microorganisms in activated sludge with gel-permeating chromatography, excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy measurement and kinetic modeling.

    Bing-Jie Ni;Fang Fang;Wen-Ming Xie;Min Sun

  • Potentials and challenges of phosphorus recovery as vivianite from wastewater: A review.

    Unknown

  • Novel strategy to stimulate the food wastes anaerobic fermentation performance by eggshell wastes conditioning and the underlying mechanisms

    Unknown

  • Treatment of coal gasification wastewater by a two-continuous UASB system with step-feed for COD and phenols removal.

    Wei Wang;Hongjun Han;Min Yuan;Huiqiang Li

  • Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process

    Bing-Jie Ni;Raymond J. Zeng;Fang Fang;Wen-Ming Xie

  • Microbial and Physicochemical Characteristics of Compact Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing Granules in an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor

    Bing-Jie Ni;Bao-Lan Hu;Fang Fang;Wen-Ming Xie

  • Improving anaerobic fermentation of waste activated sludge using iron activated persulfate treatment.

    Unknown

  • Modeling a granule-based anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (ANAMMOX) process.

    Bing-Jie Ni;You-Peng Chen;Shao-Yang Liu;Fang Fang

  • Distribution patterns of functional microbial community in anaerobic digesters under different operational circumstances: A review.

    Unknown

  • Distinct effects of hypochlorite types on the reduction of antibiotic resistance genes during waste activated sludge fermentation: Insights of bacterial community, cellular activity, and genetic expression

    Unknown

  • Fast identification of fluorescent components in three-dimensional excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectra via deep learning

    Run-Ze Xu;Jia-Shun Cao;Ganyu Feng;Jing-Yang Luo

  • Automated machine learning-based prediction of microplastics induced impacts on methane production in anaerobic digestion.

    Unknown

  • Phosphorus recovery as vivianite from waste activated sludge via optimizing iron source and pH value during anaerobic fermentation.

    Unknown

  • Mechanisms of allicin exposure for the sludge fermentation enhancement: Focusing on the fermentation processes and microbial metabolic traits

    Unknown

  • Evaluating the influence of process parameters on soluble microbial products formation using response surface methodology coupled with grey relational analysis

    Juan Xu;Guo-Ping Sheng;Hong-Wei Luo;Fang Fang

  • Removal of Cs + , Sr 2+ , and Co 2+ Ions from the Mixture of Organics and Suspended Solids Aqueous Solutions by Zeolites

    Unknown

  • Antimicrobial PCMX facilitates the volatile fatty acids production during sludge anaerobic fermentation: Insights of the interactive principles, microbial metabolic profiles and adaptation mechanisms

    Unknown

  • New insights into different surfactants’ impacts on sludge fermentation: Focusing on the particular metabolic processes and microbial genetic traits

    Unknown

  • Current status of hypochlorite technology on the wastewater treatment and sludge disposal: Performance, principals and prospects.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiashun Cao
Jiashun Cao Hohai University
Bing-Jie Ni
Bing-Jie Ni University of New South Wales
Han-Qing Yu
Han-Qing Yu University of Science and Technology of China
Wen-Wei Li
Wen-Wei Li University of Science and Technology of China
Jingyang Luo
Jingyang Luo Hohai University
Xiaohu Dai
Xiaohu Dai Tongji University
Hailin Zhang
Hailin Zhang Oklahoma State University
Guo-Ping Sheng
Guo-Ping Sheng University of Science and Technology of China
Dongbo Wang
Dongbo Wang Hunan University
Weiming Shi
Weiming Shi Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, there are several related online degree options that can enhance career prospects. Students looking to integrate social work principles with environmental advocacy might explore fully funded dsw programs, which offer advanced training without excessive financial burden.

For a broader academic foundation, an accredited affordable online general studies degree provides flexibility and multidisciplinary knowledge, allowing learners to tailor their studies to various environmental contexts.

Some students may seek quicker pathways to enter the workforce. In such cases, exploring the easiest bachelors degree options can help identify programs that balance academic rigor with manageable coursework, easing the transition into environmental careers.

Furthermore, those passionate about Earth systems can specialize through online geology degrees, which provide vital insights into the Earth's processes—a critical component of environmental science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Fang Fang

Recently Published Articles