World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3175 2919 24 24 172 8737
Engineering and Technology 49 4338 4170 23 23 171 8672

Fabio Sgarbossa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fabio Sgarbossa between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fabio Sgarbossa published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2024. 18 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2024. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
2007 2026

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fabio Sgarbossa: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 2
2009 8
2010 9
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 9
2015 15
2016 14
2017 15
2018 13
2019 7
2020 25
2021 19
2022 24
2023 17
2024 28
2025 17
2026 1
Total 243
Download as CSV

Fabio Sgarbossa publications per year - data summary

  • Fabio Sgarbossa, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, has 243 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2007 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2026, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 12.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.2 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 87 publications, 36% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2007-2013: 39 publications (5.6 per year); 2014-2020: 98 publications (14.0 per year); 2021-2026: 106 publications (17.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Fabio Sgarbossa publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Sgarbossa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 172 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 172
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Fabio Sgarbossa publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Fabio Sgarbossa, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, records 172 publications - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Fabio Sgarbossa, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Fabio Sgarbossa falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Fabio Sgarbossa D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fabio Sgarbossa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Fabio Sgarbossa D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Fabio Sgarbossa, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Norwegian University of Science and Technology, records 48 D-Index - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Fabio Sgarbossa, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Fabio Sgarbossa ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Fabio Sgarbossa is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research primarily spans engineering and business management fields, with a focused subfield in industrial and manufacturing engineering. The research outputs contribute substantially to the intersections of advanced manufacturing, logistics optimization, and digital transformation within industry settings.

The scientist has published extensively in domains that combine production research, operational performance, and human factors in production systems. Their work encompasses topics such as:

  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Assembly Line Balancing Optimization

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • International Journal of Production Research
  • International Journal of Production Economics
  • Safety Science
  • Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Fabio Sgarbossa are:

  • "Planning and control of autonomous mobile robots for intralogistics: Literature review and research agenda" (2021), published in European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Increasing flexibility and productivity in Industry 4.0 production networks with autonomous mobile robots and smart intralogistics" (2020), published in Annals of Operations Research
  • "Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future" (2020), published in Annual Reviews in Control
  • "The complementary effect of lean manufacturing and digitalisation on operational performance" (2020), published in International Journal of Production Research
  • "Human-centric production and logistics system design and management: transitioning from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0" (2023), published in International Journal of Production Research

Frequent collaborators in Fabio Sgarbossa's research include Mirco Peron, Jan Ola Strandhagen, Daria Battini, Francesco Lolli, and Giuseppe Fragapane. These co-authors have contributed to multiple projects and publications, reflecting ongoing partnerships in the exploration of production systems and logistics.

Best Publications

  • New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design

    D. Battini;M. Faccio;A. Persona;F. Sgarbossa

  • A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications

    Daria Battini;Alessandro Persona;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future

    Fabio Sgarbossa;Eric H. Grosse;Eric H. Grosse;W. Patrick Neumann;Daria Battini

  • Packaging Design: General Framework and Research Agenda

    A. Azzi;D. Battini;A. Persona;F. Sgarbossa

  • The complementary effect of lean manufacturing and digitalisation on operational performance

    Sven-Vegard Buer;Marco Semini;Jan Ola Strandhagen;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda

    Alessandro Andriolo;Daria Battini;Robert W. Grubbström;Alessandro Persona

  • A proactive model in sustainable food supply chain: Insight from a case study

    Fabio Sgarbossa;Ivan Russo

  • Ergonomics in assembly line balancing based on energy expenditure: a multi-objective model

    Daria Battini;Xavier Delorme;Alexandre Dolgui;Alessandro Persona

  • Ageing workforce management in manufacturing systems: state of the art and future research agenda

    Martina Calzavara;Daria Battini;David Bogataj;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • Innovative real-time system to integrate ergonomic evaluations into warehouse design and management

    Daria Battini;Alessandro Persona;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • Design of the optimal feeding policy in an assembly system

    Daria Battini;Maurizio Faccio;Alessandro Persona;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • Industrial maintenance policy development: A quantitative framework

    Maurizio Faccio;Alessandro Persona;Fabio Sgarbossa;Giorgia Zanin

  • Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: a methodology and case study

    Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola;Swapnil Bhalla;Fabio Sgarbossa;Jan Ola Strandhagen

  • Human energy expenditure in order picking storage assignment

    Daria Battini;Christoph H. Glock;Eric H. Grosse;Alessandro Persona

  • A decision support system for configuring spare parts supply chains considering different manufacturing technologies

    Unknown

  • A novel decision support system for managing predictive maintenance strategies based on machine learning approaches

    S. Arena;E. Florian;I. Zennaro;P.F. Orrù

  • Analysis of economic and ergonomic performance measures of different rack layouts in an order picking warehouse

    Martina Calzavara;Christoph H. Glock;Eric H. Grosse;Alessandro Persona

  • Renewable hydrogen supply chains: A planning matrix and an agenda for future research

    Unknown

  • A comparative analysis of different paperless picking systems

    Daria Battini;Martina Calzavara;Alessandro Persona;Fabio Sgarbossa

  • Inventory holding costs measurement : a multi-case study

    Anna Azzi;Daria Battini;Maurizio Faccio;Alessandro Persona

  • Human energy expenditure in order picking storage assignment: a bi-objective method

    D. Battini;C. H. Glock;E. H. Grosse;A. Persona

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Persona
Alessandro Persona University of Padua
Daria Battini
Daria Battini University of Padua
Christoph H. Glock
Christoph H. Glock Technical University of Darmstadt
Maurizio Faccio
Maurizio Faccio University of Padua
Hoang Pham
Hoang Pham Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alexandre Dolgui
Alexandre Dolgui IMT Atlantique
Olga Battaïa
Olga Battaïa Kedge Business School
Erwin Pesch
Erwin Pesch University of Siegen
Robert W. Grubbström
Robert W. Grubbström Linköping University
Riccardo Manzini
Riccardo Manzini University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens many career options in counseling, psychology, social work, and therapy. Today, more students are exploring the flexibility and accessibility of online programs tailored to these fields. Choosing a program that aligns with your goals and offers strong accreditation is crucial to qualify for licensure and professional development.

For aspiring counselors, cacrep-accredited programs online offer affordable paths to a well-recognized qualification. Those interested in relationship and family dynamics may consider mft programs that focus on marriage and family therapy.

If you are drawn to human behavior and mental health, online psychology degrees provide multiple specialization options. Meanwhile, future social workers can pursue msw online programs to start impactful careers in community services.

With these flexible online degrees, students can access high-quality education and clear career pathways from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Fabio Sgarbossa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles