World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14726 13870 1350 1291 363 23277

Eve Roman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eve Roman between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eve Roman published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2025. 33 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2025. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 32 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eve Roman: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 0
1980 3
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 6
1985 3
1986 0
1987 5
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 5
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 5
1997 8
1998 2
1999 10
2000 12
2001 16
2002 8
2003 12
2004 7
2005 13
2006 11
2007 15
2008 3
2009 5
2010 20
2011 13
2012 10
2013 20
2014 18
2015 22
2016 16
2017 14
2018 13
2019 16
2020 9
2021 12
2022 9
2023 28
2024 6
2025 32
2026 1
Total 425
Download as CSV

Eve Roman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eve Roman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 363 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 363
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Eve Roman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eve Roman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eve Roman is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Oncology.

Their research covers a variety of topics, with significant contributions made in:

  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

Eve Roman has co-authored numerous publications with frequent collaborators including Alexandra Smith, Debra Howell, Russell Patmore, Eleanor Kane, and Daniel Painter.

Key recent papers authored include:

  • "Targeted sequencing in DLBCL, molecular subtypes, and outcomes: a Haematological Malignancy Research Network report" (2020) published in Blood
  • "Childhood cancer: Estimating regional and global incidence" (2020) published in Cancer Epidemiology
  • "Sequential inverse dysregulation of the RNA helicases DDX3X and DDX3Y facilitates MYC-driven lymphomagenesis" (2021) published in Molecular Cell
  • "The incidence and prevalence of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and aplastic anaemia PNH syndrome: A retrospective analysis of the UK's population-based haematological malignancy research network 2004-2018" (2021) published in European Journal Of Haematology
  • "Application of the LymphGen classification tool to 928 clinically and genetically-characterised cases of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)" (2020) published in British Journal of Haematology

Frequent venues for Eve Roman's publications include BMJ Open, SSM Annual Scientific Meeting, UNC Libraries, Cancer Epidemiology, and European Journal of Oncology Nursing.

Best Publications

  • A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia.

    A Ahlbom;N Day;M Feychting;E Roman

  • Incidence of haematological malignancy by sub-type: a report from the Haematological Malignancy Research Network.

    A Smith;D Howell;R Patmore;A Jack;A Jack

  • Rearrangement of MYC Is Associated With Poor Prognosis in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated in the Era of Rituximab

    Sharon Barrans;Simon Crouch;Alex Smith;Kathryn Turner

  • Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are associated with susceptibility to acute leukemia in adults

    Christine F. Skibola;Martyn T. Smith;Eleanor Kane;Eve Roman

  • Loci on 7p12.2, 10q21.2 and 14q11.2 are associated with risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Elli Papaemmanuil;Fay J Hosking;Jayaram Vijayakrishnan;Amy Price

  • Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models.

    Lucy M. Anderson;Bhalchandra A. Diwan;Nicola T. Fear;Eve Roman

  • Genetic variation in TNF and IL10 and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the InterLymph Consortium

    Nathaniel Rothman;Christine F Skibola;Sophia S Wang;Gareth Morgan

  • Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network

    Alexandra Gwen Smith;Simon Crouch;Stephanie Joyce Lax;J. Li

  • Etiologic Heterogeneity Among Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes: The InterLymph Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes Project

    Lindsay M. Morton;Susan L. Slager;James R. Cerhan;Sophia S. Wang

  • Targeted sequencing in DLBCL, molecular subtypes, and outcomes: a Haematological Malignancy Research Network report

    Stuart E. Lacy;Sharon L. Barrans;Philip A. Beer;Daniel Painter

  • Polymorphism in glutathione S-transferase P1 is associated with susceptibility to chemotherapy-induced leukemia

    James M. Allan;Christopher P. Wild;Sara Rollinson;Eleanor V. Willett

  • Polymorphisms in the thymidylate synthase and serine hydroxymethyltransferase genes and risk of adult acute lymphocytic leukemia.

    Christine F. Skibola;Martyn T. Smith;Alan Hubbard;Barry Shane

  • Variation in CDKN2A at 9p21.3 influences childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk

    Amy L. Sherborne;Fay J. Hosking;Rashmi B. Prasad;Rajiv Kumar

  • Pregnancy outcome in insulin-dependent diabetics with thyroid disease or pernicious anaemia.

    Eve Roman;Valerie Beral

  • Haematological malignancy: are patients appropriately referred for specialist palliative and hospice care? A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data

    Debra A Howell;Rhiannon Shellens;Eve Roman;Anne C Garry

  • A genome-wide association study of Hodgkin's lymphoma identifies new susceptibility loci at 2p16.1 ( REL ), 8q24.21 and 10p14 ( GATA3 )

    Victor Enciso-Mora;Peter Broderick;Yussanne Ma;Ruth F. Jarrett

  • Epidemiology of lymphomas

    Eve Roman;Alexandra Gwen Smith

  • The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study: objectives, materials and methods

    R. Doll;E. Roman;N. E. Day;G. Law

  • Low NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 activity is associated with increased risk of acute leukemia in adults.

    Martyn T. Smith;Martyn T. Smith;Yunxia Wang;Yunxia Wang;Eleanor Kane;Eleanor Kane;Sara Rollinson;Sara Rollinson

  • Age and sex distributions of hematological malignancies in the U.K

    R. J. Q. McNally;D. Rowland;E. Roman;R. A. Cartwright

Frequent Co-Authors

Valerie Beral
Valerie Beral University of Oxford
Mads Melbye
Mads Melbye University of Copenhagen
Gareth J. Morgan
Gareth J. Morgan Boston University
Hans-Olov Adami
Hans-Olov Adami Karolinska Institute
Angela Brooks-Wilson
Angela Brooks-Wilson Simon Fraser University
Paige M. Bracci
Paige M. Bracci University of California, San Francisco
John J. Spinelli
John J. Spinelli University of British Columbia
Martyn T. Smith
Martyn T. Smith University of California, Berkeley
Paolo Boffetta
Paolo Boffetta Stony Brook Medicine
Alexandra Nieters
Alexandra Nieters University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees can broaden your career options beyond traditional medical school. For students interested in wellness and disease prevention, online nutrition degrees offer flexible pathways to work in dietetics, public health, or health education. These programs are ideal if you’re passionate about promoting healthy lifestyles and nutrition science.

If you aspire to move into healthcare leadership, cahme-accredited online mha programs provide rigorous training in hospital and health systems management. These fully online programs can prepare you for roles such as healthcare administrator or policy maker.

For registered nurses aiming to expand their credentials, there are rn to bsn with no clinicals programs that offer greater flexibility while still enhancing your professional value. Such programs are especially suited for working RNs seeking advancement.

Nurses wishing to reach the highest clinical or academic ranks can look into accelerated dnp programs online to quickly achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These innovative programs open doors to advanced practice, leadership, and teaching positions without an extended campus commitment.

Best Scientists Citing Eve Roman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles