World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6576
World Ranking
833
National Ranking
444

Erik P. Bucy publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik P. Bucy sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 136 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Erik P. Bucy D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik P. Bucy sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erik P. Bucy is affiliated with Texas Tech University in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the social sciences, with a total of 41 publications. Bucy's work spans various subfields including sociology and political science, communication, artificial intelligence, political science and international relations, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics focus on media studies and communication, social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, media influence and politics, and populism and right-wing movements.

Erik P. Bucy has published several papers, including:

  • Performing populism: Trump's transgressive debate style and the dynamics of Twitter response, 2020, New Media & Society
  • Editors' Introduction: Visual Politics, Grand Collaborative Programs, and the Opportunity to Think Big, 2020, The International Journal of Press/Politics

Frequent coauthors in Bucy's research include Dhavan V. Shah, Zhongkai Sun, Patrick A. Stewart, Jungseock Joo, and Sang Jeong Kim. These collaborations reflect a consistent network in the fields of communication and political science.

Regarding publication venues, Bucy has contributed multiple papers to the Journal of Visual Political Communication, New Media & Society, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Visual Communication Quarterly, and The International Journal of Press/Politics.

In addition to journal articles, Erik P. Bucy has authored a book titled Political Rhetoric and the Media, published in 2022 by Purdue University Press.

Best Publications

  • Image Bite Politics: News and the Visual Framing of Elections

    Maria Elizabeth Grabe;Erik Page Bucy

  • The sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques

    Unknown

  • Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept

    Erik P. Bucy

  • Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects between On-Air and Online News:

    Erik P. Bucy

  • Social Access to the Internet

    Erik P. Bucy

  • Image Bite Politics

    Maria Elizabeth Grabe;Erik Page Bucy

  • Media Participation A Legitimizing Mechanism of Mass Democracy

    Erik P. Bucy;Kimberly S. Gregson

  • The Mediated Moderation Model of Interactivity

    Erik P. Bucy;Chen-Chao Tao

  • Taking Television Seriously: A Sound and Image Bite Analysis of Presidential Campaign Coverage, 1992–2004

    Erik P. Bucy;Maria Elizabeth Grabe

  • Formal features of cyberspace: relationships between Web page complexity and site traffic

    Erik P. Bucy;Annie Lang;Robert F. Potter;Maria Elizabeth Grabe

  • Emotional and Evaluative Consequences of Inappropriate Leader Displays

    Erik P. Bucy

  • The Interactivity Paradox: Closer to the News but Confused

    Erik P. Bucy

  • Media Access : Social and Psychological Dimensions of New Technology Use

    Erik P. Bucy;John E. Newhagen

  • Second Generation Net News: Interactivity and Information Accessibility in the Online Environment

    Erik P. Bucy

  • The emotional appropriateness heuristic: processing televised presidential reactions to the news

    Erik P. Bucy;John E. Newhagen

  • Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays:

    Erik P. Bucy;Samuel D. Bradley

  • Conceptualizing Media Stimuli in Experimental Research: Psychological Versus Attribute‐Based Definitions

    Chen-Chao Tao;Erik P. Bucy

  • Living in the Information Age: A New Media Reader

    Erik Page Bucy

  • Performing populism: Trump’s transgressive debate style and the dynamics of Twitter response:

    Erik P. Bucy;Jordan M. Foley;Josephine Lukito;Larissa Doroshenko

  • Conferring Resistance to Digital Disinformation: The Inoculating Influence of Procedural News Knowledge

    Michelle A. Amazeen;Erik P. Bucy

  • The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age Linking Biobehavioral and Computational Approaches via the Second Screen

    Dhavan V. Shah;Alex Hanna;Erik P. Bucy;Chris Wells

  • Emotion, Presidential Communication, and Traumatic News Processing the World Trade Center Attacks

    Erik P. Bucy

  • The micro‐ and macrodrama of politics on television: Effects of media format on candidate evaluations

    Erik P. Bucy;John E. Newhagen

  • Self-esteem moderates the influence of self-presentation style on Facebook users’ sense of subjective well-being

    Wonseok (Eric) Jang;Erik P. Bucy;Janice Cho

  • Dual Screening During Presidential Debates: Political Nonverbals and the Volume and Valence of Online Expression

    Dhavan V. Shah;Alex Hanna;Erik P. Bucy;David S. Lassen

  • Interpreting Images of Fracking: How Visual Frames and Standing Attitudes Shape Perceptions of Environmental Risk and Economic Benefit

    Amber Krause;Erik P. Bucy

  • “Happy warriors” revisited Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news

    Erik P. Bucy;Maria Elizabeth Grabe

Frequent Co-Authors

Dhavan V. Shah
Dhavan V. Shah University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jon C. Pevehouse
Jon C. Pevehouse University of Wisconsin–Madison
William A. Sethares
William A. Sethares University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carl Senior
Carl Senior Aston University
Annie Lang
Annie Lang Indiana University
Nick Lee
Nick Lee University of Warwick
Caroline Haythornthwaite
Caroline Haythornthwaite Syracuse University
Philip Shapira
Philip Shapira University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA offers connections to a variety of related academic disciplines and professional fields. For students interested in expanding their skillset, considering a online math degree programs can be a smart move. Analytical and statistical skills from mathematics are increasingly valuable for political analysis, policy evaluation, and data-driven public administration.

If your career interests align with research, information management, or public service, exploring an online library science degree is another relevant pathway. Skills in organizing information and understanding information policy can complement a political science background.

A bachelor degree in history also closely aligns with political science, providing a deep understanding of the historical context behind modern political systems and global events. Graduates can pursue careers in research, education, and government.

Finally, students seeking flexible and customizable learning should consider master's interdisciplinary studies programs. These degrees allow you to blend political science with other interests, including law, communications, or business, potentially opening up a wider array of career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Erik P. Bucy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles