World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
7059
World Ranking
7412
National Ranking
3195

Eric Frank publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Frank sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eric Frank D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Frank sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric Frank is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including social sciences and engineering. The primary subfields of study connected to their work encompass computer science applications, education, sociology and political science, transportation, and building and construction.

Their research topics focus on several key areas: teaching and learning programming, education and technology integration, education and digital technologies, transportation planning and optimization, traffic prediction and management techniques, and transportation and mobility innovations.

Eric Frank has contributed to academic literature with publications in the following venues:

  • Education Sciences
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Teachers' Perspectives on the Intertwining of Tangible and Digital Modes of Activity with a Drawing Robot for Geometry, 2020, Education Sciences
  • DeeprETA: An ETA Post-processing System at Scale, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors of Eric Frank include:

  • Anna Baccaglini-Frank
  • George Santi
  • Agnese Del Zozzo
  • Xinyu Hu
  • Tanmay Binaykiya

Best Publications

  • ETS Gene Er81 Controls the Formation of Functional Connections between Group Ia Sensory Afferents and Motor Neurons

    Silvia Arber;David R Ladle;Jonathan H Lin;Eric Frank

  • Early events in neuromuscular junction formation in vitro: induction of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the postsynaptic membrane and morphology of newly formed synapses.

    E Frank;G D Fischbach

  • Lineage of neurons and glia in chick dorsal root ganglia: analysis in vivo with a recombinant retrovirus.

    E. Frank;J.R. Sanes

  • Neurotrophin 3 supports the survival of developing muscle sensory neurons in culture

    Freya Hory-Lee;Michelle Russell;Ronald M. Lindsay;Eric Frank

  • Restoration of Visual Function by Enhancing Conduction in Regenerated Axons.

    Fengfeng Bei;Henry Hing Cheong Lee;Xuefeng Liu;Georgia Gunner

  • V1 and V2b Interneurons Secure the Alternating Flexor-Extensor Motor Activity Mice Require for Limbed Locomotion

    Jingming Zhang;Guillermo M. Lanuza;Guillermo M. Lanuza;Olivier Britz;Zhi Wang

  • Pax6 and Engrailed 1 Regulate Two Distinct Aspects of Renshaw Cell Development

    Tamar Sapir;Eric J. Geiman;Zhi Wang;Tomoko Velasquez

  • Development of the monosynaptic stretch reflex circuit

    Hsiao-Huei Chen;Simon Hippenmeyer;Silvia Arber;Eric Frank

  • Formation of Specific Monosynaptic Connections between Muscle Spindle Afferents and Motoneurons in the Mouse

    Simon C. Mears;Eric Frank

  • Development of central projections of lumbosacral sensory neurons in the chick

    Brian M. Davis;Eric Frank;Frances A. Johnson;Sheryl A. Scott

  • A multisomatic axon in the central nervous system of the leech.

    Eric Frank;Jan K. S. Jansen;Eric Rinvik

  • Muscle Spindle-Derived Neurotrophin 3 Regulates Synaptic Connectivity between Muscle Sensory and Motor Neurons

    Hsiao Huei Chen;Warren G. Tourtellotte;Eric Frank

  • Neurotrophin-3 Promotes the Differentiation of Muscle Spindle Afferents in the Absence of Peripheral Targets

    Robert A. Oakley;Frances B. Lefcort;Frances B. Lefcort;Douglas O. Clary;Louis F. Reichardt

  • Lysophosphatidyl choline facilitates labeling of CNS projections with horseradish peroxidase.

    Eric Frank;William A. Harris;Mary B. Kennedy

  • P0 is an early marker of the Schwann cell lineage in chickens.

    Anita Bhattacharyya;Eric Frank;Nancy Ratner;Robert Brackenbury

  • Muscle sensory neurons require neurotrophin-3 from peripheral tissues during the period of normal cell death.

    R.A. Oakley;A.S. Garner;T.H. Large;E. Frank

  • The nicotinic blocking agents d-tubocurare and alpha-bungarotoxin save motoneurons from naturally occurring death in the absence of neuromuscular blockade

    Freya Hory-Lee;E. Frank

  • Persistent restoration of sensory function by immediate or delayed systemic artemin after dorsal root injury.

    Ruizhong Wang;Tamara King;Michael H Ossipov;Anthony J Rossomando

  • Late-migrating neuroepithelial cells from the spinal cord differentiate into sensory ganglion cells and melanocytes.

    Kamal Sharma;Zeljka Korade;Eric Frank

  • Anatomical basis of specific connections between sensory axons and motor neurons in the brachial spinal cord of the bullfrog.

    J. W. Lichtman;Sonal Jhaveri;E. Frank

  • Sensory Neurons: Diversity, Development and Plasticity: edited by Sheryl A. Scott, Oxford University Press, 1992. £70.00 (441 pages) ISBN 0 19 506676 6

    Eric Frank

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvia Arber
Silvia Arber University of Basel
Thomas M. Jessell
Thomas M. Jessell Columbia University
Jonathan A. Raper
Jonathan A. Raper University of Pennsylvania
Louis F. Reichardt
Louis F. Reichardt University of California, San Francisco
David Prevette
David Prevette Wake Forest University
Ronald W. Oppenheim
Ronald W. Oppenheim Wake Forest University
Nancy Ratner
Nancy Ratner Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Alexandre F.R. Stewart
Alexandre F.R. Stewart University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career paths that can expand your expertise and job opportunities. Many individuals combine their neuroscience background with a msw degree (Master of Social Work) to work in clinical, research, or community mental health roles. Online MSW programs offer flexibility and can prepare graduates for a variety of settings.

Another growing field is applied behavior analysis. Earning a bcba certification (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) qualifies you for specialized roles in therapy, research, and education—an ideal path for neuroscience graduates interested in behavior and learning processes.

If you’re eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider 1 year msw programs and fast track psychology degree options. These accelerated programs allow motivated students to complete their degrees faster and start building their professional careers sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Frank

Recently Published Articles