World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 70 1973 1798 832 733 199 14567

Duane L. Pierson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Duane L. Pierson between 1969 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Duane L. Pierson published across 55 years, from 1969 to 2023, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 1 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1969 2023

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Duane L. Pierson: publications per year, 1969 to 2023
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 2
1973 4
1974 4
1975 1
1976 2
1977 3
1978 0
1979 0
1980 3
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 3
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 3
1992 7
1993 7
1994 3
1995 6
1996 5
1997 6
1998 5
1999 8
2000 10
2001 9
2002 4
2003 8
2004 7
2005 7
2006 3
2007 10
2008 9
2009 7
2010 3
2011 12
2012 2
2013 10
2014 7
2015 5
2016 8
2017 9
2018 4
2019 9
2020 6
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 231
Download as CSV

Duane L. Pierson publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duane L. Pierson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 195–204 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 199 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234 199
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Duane L. Pierson D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Duane L. Pierson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94 70
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Duane L. Pierson is affiliated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in the United States. Their research mainly focuses on the biological effects of spaceflight, particularly in relation to physiology, genetics, and biochemistry. The scientist has contributed extensively to understanding how long-duration space missions impact human health and biological responses.

Pierson's work spans several fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these main fields, their subfields of study include Physiology, Genetics, Periodontics, Rehabilitation, and Social Psychology. The research topics they cover prominently feature spaceflight effects on biology, high altitude and hypoxia, thermoregulation and physiological responses, salivary gland disorders and functions, oral microbiology and periodontitis research, exercise and physiological responses, and outdoor and experiential education.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Pierson represent various angles of space biology and biomedical countermeasures during spaceflight:

  • Countermeasures-based Improvements in Stress, Immune System Dysregulation and Latent Herpesvirus Reactivation onboard the International Space Station - Relevance for Deep Space Missions and Terrestrial Medicine (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • The influence of spaceflight on the astronaut salivary microbiome and the search for a microbiome biomarker for viral reactivation (2020, Microbiome)
  • Exercise as a countermeasure for latent viral reactivation during long duration space flight (2020, The FASEB Journal)
  • Simulated microgravity disarms human NK-cells and inhibits anti-tumor cytotoxicity in vitro (2020, Acta Astronautica)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Brian Crucian, Satish Mehta, Richard J. Simpson, Clarence F. Sams, and Bridgette V. Rooney. These coauthors appear multiple times in Pierson's publication record, indicating ongoing research partnerships in related subject areas.

Pierson's publications have appeared in specialized venues that address neuroscience, microbiology, space biology, and physiology, including Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Microbiome, The FASEB Journal, and Acta Astronautica. The significant diversity of these journals reflects the interdisciplinary nature of their research.

Best Publications

  • Space flight alters bacterial gene expression and virulence and reveals a role for global regulator Hfq

    J. W. Wilson;C. M. Ott;K. Höner zu Bentrup;R. Ramamurthy

  • Microbial Responses to Microgravity and Other Low-Shear Environments

    Cheryl A. Nickerson;C. Mark Ott;James W. Wilson;Rajee Ramamurthy

  • Immune System Dysregulation During Spaceflight: Potential Countermeasures for Deep Space Exploration Missions.

    Brian E. Crucian;Alexander Choukèr;Richard J. Simpson;Satish Mehta

  • Stress‐induced subclinical reactivation of varicella zoster virus in astronauts

    Satish K. Mehta;Randall J. Cohrs;Bagher Forghani;Gary Zerbe

  • Exercise as a countermeasure for latent viral reactivation during long duration space flight

    Nadia H. Agha;Satish K. Mehta;Bridgette V. Rooney;Mitzi S. Laughlin

  • Microgravity as a Novel Environmental Signal Affecting Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Virulence

    Cheryl A. Nickerson;C. Mark Ott;Sarah J. Mister;Brian J. Morrow

  • Reactivation and Shedding of Cytomegalovirus in Astronauts during Spaceflight

    Satish K. Mehta;Raymond P. Stowe;Alan H. Feiveson;Stephen K. Tyring

  • Immune system dysregulation following short- vs long-duration spaceflight.

    Brian E. Crucian;Raymond P. Stowe;Duane L. Pierson;Clarence F. Sams

  • A549 Lung Epithelial Cells Grown as Three-Dimensional Aggregates: Alternative Tissue Culture Model for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pathogenesis

    A. J. Carterson;K. Höner zu Bentrup;C. M. Ott;M. S. Clarke

  • Microbiomes of the dust particles collected from the International Space Station and Spacecraft Assembly Facilities

    Aleksandra Checinska;Alexander J. Probst;Parag Vaishampayan;James R. White

  • Epstein-Barr virus shedding by astronauts during space flight.

    D.L. Pierson;R.P. Stowe;T.M. Phillips;D.J. Lugg

  • Incidence of clinical symptoms during long-duration orbital spaceflight.

    Brian Crucian;Adriana Babiak-Vazquez;Smith Johnston;Duane L Pierson

  • Study of the impact of long-duration space missions at the International Space Station on the astronaut microbiome.

    Alexander A. Voorhies;C. Mark Ott;Satish Mehta;Duane L. Pierson

  • Immune System Dysregulation Occurs During Short Duration Spaceflight On Board the Space Shuttle

    Brian Crucian;Raymond Stowe;Satish Mehta;Peter Uchakin

  • Microarray analysis identifies Salmonella genes belonging to the low-shear modeled microgravity regulon

    James W. Wilson;Rajee Ramamurthy;Steffen Porwollik;Michael McClelland

  • Asymptomatic reactivation and shed of infectious varicella zoster virus in astronauts.

    Randall J. Cohrs;Satish K. Mehta;D. Scott Schmid;Donald H. Gilden

  • Changes in monocyte functions of astronauts.

    Indreshpal Kaur;Elizabeth R. Simons;Victoria A. Castro;C. Mark Ott

  • Plasma Cytokine Concentrations Indicate That In Vivo Hormonal Regulation of Immunity Is Altered During Long-Duration Spaceflight

    Brian E. Crucian;Sara R. Zwart;Satish Mehta;Peter Uchakin

  • Changes in neutrophil functions in astronauts.

    Indreshpal Kaur;Elizabeth R Simons;Victoria A Castro;C Mark Ott

  • The Dynamics of Herpesvirus and Polyomavirus Reactivation and Shedding in Healthy Adults: A 14-Month Longitudinal Study

    Paul D Ling;John A Lednicky;Wendy A Keitel;David G Poston

  • Low-shear modeled microgravity: a global environmental regulatory signal affecting bacterial gene expression, physiology, and pathogenesis.

    Cheryl A Nickerson;C.Mark Ott;James W Wilson;Rajee Ramamurthy

  • Leukocyte subsets and neutrophil function after short-term spaceflight.

    Raymond P. Stowe;Clarence F. Sams;Satish K. Mehta;Indreshpal Kaur

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Simpson
Richard J. Simpson La Trobe University
Stephen K. Tyring
Stephen K. Tyring The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Randall J. Cohrs
Randall J. Cohrs University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Donald H. Gilden
Donald H. Gilden University of Colorado Denver
George E. Fox
George E. Fox University of Houston
Kasthuri Venkateswaran
Kasthuri Venkateswaran Jet Propulsion Lab
Michael J. Schurr
Michael J. Schurr University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Timothy G. Hammond
Timothy G. Hammond Veterans Health Administration
Alan D.T. Barrett
Alan D.T. Barrett The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Michael McClelland
Michael McClelland University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. One promising avenue is healthcare administration, where roles like Health Information Manager are growing rapidly. Professionals in this field manage patient data and healthcare records while ensuring compliance with regulations. Learning more about health information management jobs salary reveals competitive compensation, reflecting the importance of this expertise.

Those interested in complementary certifications may consider programs in medical billing and coding. These fast-paced fields often offer fast track medical billing and coding certificate online options, allowing for quicker entry into the healthcare sector. Understanding the cpc salary and career paths can help align educational goals with industry demands.

To ensure quality education in related fields, many students prefer online health information management degree programs cahiim accredited. Such accreditation guarantees the program meets industry standards, benefiting long-term career growth. By integrating microbiology with healthcare management and coding skills, graduates can diversify their career pathways and enhance their professional potential.

Best Scientists Citing Duane L. Pierson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles