World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
7888
World Ranking
6922
National Ranking
2990

Douglas B. McCreery publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas B. McCreery sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 89 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Douglas B. McCreery D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas B. McCreery sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas B. McCreery is affiliated with the Huntington Medical Research Institutes in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with notable contributions to the subfields of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Urology, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Douglas B. McCreery's recent publications cover a range of neuroscience and biomedical engineering topics. Selected papers include:

  • Neuropathological effects of chronically implanted, intracortical microelectrodes in a tetraplegic patient, 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • PRIMA subretinal wireless photovoltaic microchip implantation in non-human primate and feline models, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Configuring intracortical microelectrode arrays and stimulus parameters to minimize neuron loss during prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation, 2021, Brain Stimulation
  • Intraspinal stimulation with a silicon-based 3D chronic microelectrode array for bladder voiding in cats, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Intraspinal stimulation with silicon-based 3D microelectrode array for bladder voiding in cats before and after spinal cord injury, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The venues where Douglas B. McCreery publishes frequently include:

  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • PLoS ONE
  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent collaborators working alongside Douglas B. McCreery are:

  • Martin Han
  • Victor Pikov
  • Carol A. Miller
  • Linda J. Szymanski
  • Spencer Kellis

Best Publications

  • Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation

    D.B. McCreery;W.F. Agnew;T.G.H. Yuen;L. Bullara

  • Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes

    Xindong Liu;D.B. McCreery;R.R. Carter;L.A. Bullara

  • Considerations for safety with chronically implanted nerve electrodes.

    William F. Agnew;Douglas B. McCreery

  • Neural prostheses : fundamental studies

    William F. Agnew;Douglas B. McCreery

  • Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters.

    William F. Agnew;Douglas B. McCreery;Ted G. H. Yuen;Leo A. Bullara

  • Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation.

    Stuart F Cogan;Andrew A Guzelian;William F Agnew;Ted G.H Yuen

  • Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation

    W.F. Agnew;T.G.H. Yuen;D.B. McCreery;L.A. Bullara

  • Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials.

    Unknown

  • Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application.

    Ted G. H. Yuen;William F. Agnew;Leo A. Bullara;Skip Jacques

  • Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes.

    D. B. McCreery;W. F. Agnew;T. G. H. Yuen;L. A. Bullara

  • A model for intracortical visual prosthesis research.

    Philip Troyk;Martin Bak;Joshua Berg;David Bradley

  • Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1.

    D. C. Bradley;P. R. Troyk;J. A. Berg;M. Bak

  • Effects of stimulating in raphe nuclei and in reticular formation on response of spinothalamic neurons to mechanical stimuli.

    D. B. McCreery;J. R. Bloedel;E. G. Hames

  • Neuroprotection of ischemic brain by vascular endothelial growth factor is critically dependent on proper dosage and may be compromised by angiogenesis.

    Panya S Manoonkitiwongsa;Robert L Schultz;Douglas B McCreery;Ernest F Whitter

  • A characterization of the effects on neuronal excitability due to prolonged microstimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes

    D.B. McCreery;T.G.H. Yuen;W.F. Agnew;L.A. Bullara

  • Evolution and resolution of stimulation-induced axonal injury in peripheral nerve.

    William F. Agnew;Douglas B. McCreery;Ted G. H. Yuen;Leo A. Bullara

  • Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex

    Douglas McCreery;Victor Pikov;Philip R Troyk

  • Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of two stimulus waveforms.

    D. B. McCreery;W. F. Agnew;T. G. H. Yuen;L. A. Bullara

  • Relationship between stimulus amplitude, stimulus frequency and neural damage during electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve of cat.

    D. B. McCreery;W. F. Agnew;T. G. H. Yuen;L. A. Bullara

  • Morphologic changes after prolonged electrical stimulation of the cat's cortex at defined charge densities

    William F. Agnew;Ted G.H. Yuen;Douglas B. McCreery

  • Chronic microstimulation in the feline ventral cochlear nucleus: physiologic and histologic effects.

    D.B McCreery;T.G.H Yuen;L.A Bullara

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart F. Cogan
Stuart F. Cogan The University of Texas at Dallas
Vernon L. Towle
Vernon L. Towle University of Chicago
Charles Y. Liu
Charles Y. Liu University of Southern California
Richard A. Andersen
Richard A. Andersen California Institute of Technology
José-Alain Sahel
José-Alain Sahel University of Pittsburgh
Patrick D. Lyden
Patrick D. Lyden University of Southern California
Philippe Hantraye
Philippe Hantraye University of Paris-Saclay
Serge Picaud
Serge Picaud Institut de la Vision

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Douglas B. McCreery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles