World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
12444
World Ranking
5034
National Ranking
25

Dimitris Achlioptas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dimitris Achlioptas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dimitris Achlioptas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dimitris Achlioptas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Dimitris Achlioptas is affiliated with the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece. Their research spans the fields of Computer Science and Mathematics, with particular focus on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Computer Networks and Communications, and Mathematical Physics.

Their main topics of research include Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods, Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Theoretical and Computational Physics, Data Management and Algorithms, and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge.

Recent publications by Dimitris Achlioptas cover a range of topics in theoretical computer science and related areas. Notable papers include:

  • The number of satisfying assignments of random 2-SAT formulas, 2021, Random Structures and Algorithms
  • The random 2-SAT partition function, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Local Approximations of the Independent Set Polynomial, 2021, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • A Simpler Proof of the Four Functions Theorem and Some New Variants, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)
  • Special Section on the Fiftieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2018), 2020, SIAM Journal on Computing

Dimitris Achlioptas has collaborated frequently with a group of coauthors. These include Kostas Zampetakis, Amin Coja-Oghlan, Max Hahn-Klimroth, Joon Lee, and Noëla Müller, with multiple joint publications.

The scientist's work is commonly published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Random Structures and Algorithms, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT), and the SIAM Journal on Computing.

In recognition of their contributions, Dimitris Achlioptas was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins

    Dimitris Achlioptas

  • Database-friendly random projections

    Dimitris Achlioptas

  • Fast computation of low-rank matrix approximations

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Frank Mcsherry

  • Explosive Percolation in Random Networks

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Raissa M. D'Souza;Raissa M. D'Souza;Joel Spencer

  • System and method for employing social networks for information discovery

    Dimitris Achlioptas

  • The two possible values of the chromatic number of a random graph

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Assaf Naor

  • Algorithmic Barriers from Phase Transitions

    D. Achlioptas;A. Coja-Oghlan

  • The threshold for random k-SAT is 2k (ln 2 - O(k))

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Yuval Peres

  • On spectral learning of mixtures of distributions

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Frank McSherry

  • On the bias of traceroute sampling: Or, power-law degree distributions in regular graphs

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Aaron Clauset;David Kempe;Cristopher Moore

  • Rigorous location of phase transitions in hard optimization problems

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Assaf Naor;Yuval Peres

  • The threshold for random k-SAT is 2^k log 2 - O(k)

    Unknown

  • Generating Satisfiable Problem Instances

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Carla P. Gomes;Henry A. Kautz;Bart Selman

  • Sampling Techniques for Kernel Methods

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Frank Mcsherry;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • Random $k$-SAT: Two Moments Suffice to Cross a Sharp Threshold

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Cristopher Moore

  • Lower bounds for random 3-SAT via differential equations

    Dimitris Achlioptas

  • Methods and systems for computing singular value decompositions of matrices and low rank approximations of matrices

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Frank D. McSherry

  • Stateless, affinity-preserving load balancing

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Sean B. House

  • On the solution-space geometry of random constraint satisfaction problems

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Federico Ricci-Tersenghi

  • Random constraint satisfaction: a more accurate picture

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Lefteris M. Kirousis;Evangelos Kranakis;Danny Krizanc

  • Two-coloring random hypergraphs

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Jeong Han Kim;Michael Krivelevich;Prasad Tetali

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristopher Moore
Cristopher Moore Santa Fe Institute
Michael Molloy
Michael Molloy University of Toronto
Frank McSherry
Frank McSherry Materialize, Inc.
Assaf Naor
Assaf Naor Princeton University
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
David Kempe
David Kempe University of Southern California
Evangelos Kranakis
Evangelos Kranakis Carleton University
Aaron Clauset
Aaron Clauset University of Colorado Boulder
Henry Kautz
Henry Kautz University of Virginia
Paul Beame
Paul Beame University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens doors to a wide range of academic and professional opportunities in the USA. Many students today are looking for flexible and affordable options to earn their credentials online. Whether you are starting your journey or seeking to advance in the field, there are several pathways to consider.

For those interested in advanced research or academic careers, pursuing one of the cheapest phd programs online can provide both cost savings and flexibility. Alternatively, educators looking to move up quickly might benefit from exploring the shortest online edd programs to earn leadership roles in education.

If you’re looking to enter the workforce quickly, consider completing a 6 month degree course to gain essential skills in a short time frame. For those interested in combining technical knowledge with business acumen, the best online business management degree programs can offer a strong foundation in management alongside technical expertise.

These diverse online programs help students balance career goals with personal and financial constraints, making quality education accessible to more learners.

Best Scientists Citing Dimitris Achlioptas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles