World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
5590
World Ranking
11305
National Ranking
5906

Diana Van Lancker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Van Lancker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diana Van Lancker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Van Lancker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana Van Lancker is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their academic career involves research and teaching within this institution.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues recorded for this researcher in the provided data. Similarly, there are no listed book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics of work available for detailed description.

There are no awards documented in the available information.

The absence of detailed data on publications, research areas, and collaborations suggests that either this information has not been recorded or that the scientist's profile is minimal in public academic databases at this time.

Best Publications

  • A Crosslinguistic PET Study of Tone Perception

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Li Hsieh;Bret Weinzapfel

  • Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients.

    Diana Roupas Van Lancker;Daniel Kempler

  • Hemispheric specialization for pitch and "tone": Evidence from Thai.

    Diana Van Lancker;Victoria A. Fromkin

  • Voice discrimination and recognition are separate abilities

    Diana Van Lancker;Jody Kreiman

  • Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I. Recognition of backward voices

    Diana Van Lancker;Jody Kreiman;Karen Emmorey

  • Phonagnosia: a dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices.

    Diana Roupas Van Lancker;Jeffrey L. Cummings;Jody Kreiman;Bruce H. Dobkin;Bruce H. Dobkin

  • Impairment of Voice and Face Recognition in Patients with Hemispheric Damage

    Diana Roupas Van Lancker;Gerald J Canter

  • Cerebral Lateralization of Pitch Cues in the Linguistic Signal

    Diana van Lancker

  • Effect of speech task on intelligibility in dysarthria: a case study of Parkinson's disease.

    Daniel Kempler;Diana Van Lancker

  • Disambiguation of ditropic sentences: Acoustic and phonetic cues

    Diana Van Lancker;Gerald J. Canter;Dale Terbeek

  • Impaired perception of vocal emotions in Parkinson's disease: influence of speech time processing and executive functioning.

    Caterina Breitenstein;Caterina Breitenstein;Diana Van Lancker;Diana Van Lancker;Irene Daum;Cheryl H. Waters;Cheryl H. Waters

  • Personal relevance and the human right hemisphere.

    Diana Van Lancker

  • The contribution of speech rate and pitch variation to the perception of vocal emotions in a German and an American sample

    Caterina Breitenstein;Diana Van Lancker;Irene Daum

  • Rags to Riches: Our Increasing Appreciation of Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of the Human Right Cerebral Hemisphere

    Diana Van Lancker

  • Nonpropositional speech: Neurolinguistic studies

    Diana Van Lancker

  • Development and Validation of the Neuropsychology Behavior and Affect Profile

    Linda D. Nelson;Paul Satz;Maura Mitrushina;Wilfred Van Gorp;Wilfred Van Gorp

  • Recognition of emotional‐prosodic meanings in speech by autistic, schizophrenic, and normal children

    Diana Van Lancker;Cathleen Cornelius;Jody Kreiman

  • Subcortical structures in aphasia. An analysis based on (F-18)-fluorodeoxyglucose, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography.

    E. Jeffrey Metter;E. Jeffrey Metter;Walter H. Riege;Walter H. Riege;Wayne R. Hanson;Catherine A. Jackson

  • Preserved recognition of familiar personal names in global aphasia.

    Diana Van Lancker;Karen Klein

  • The neurology of proverbs.

    Diana Van Lancker

Frequent Co-Authors

Jody Kreiman
Jody Kreiman University of California, Los Angeles
E. Jeffrey Metter
E. Jeffrey Metter University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Karen Emmorey
Karen Emmorey San Diego State University
Irene Daum
Irene Daum Ruhr University Bochum
Bruce H. Dobkin
Bruce H. Dobkin University of California, Los Angeles
Scott T. Grafton
Scott T. Grafton University of California, Santa Barbara
Ingo Hertrich
Ingo Hertrich University of Tübingen
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Jack Gandour
Jack Gandour Purdue University West Lafayette
John J. Sidtis
John J. Sidtis New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology programs offer flexible options for students who want to advance their studies while managing other responsibilities. With the demand for mental health professionals rising, these degrees have become a popular pathway to diverse careers in counseling, social work, human resources, research, and healthcare.

Many institutions now offer accelerated formats, allowing students to complete their degrees faster than traditional models. For example, students in Arizona can benefit from accelerated online psychology degrees in Arizona, while those in the Southeast might consider accelerated online psychology bachelor’s degrees in Florida.

Additionally, metropolitan areas offer unique opportunities—students in Texas may explore accelerated online psychology bachelor’s degrees in Houston. For those in the Mountain West, there are also fastest online psychology programs in Colorado.

These online and accelerated options help aspiring psychologists enter the workforce sooner, making them an attractive choice for those eager to start their professional journey or pursue further graduate study.

Best Scientists Citing Diana Van Lancker

Recently Published Articles