World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3934 3628 2201 1982 123 39064

David M. Garner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Garner between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Garner published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2022. 14 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2022. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 7 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 3 publications
1976 2026

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Garner: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 3
1979 2
1980 3
1981 1
1982 7
1983 6
1984 4
1985 4
1986 11
1987 10
1988 7
1989 3
1990 3
1991 7
1992 3
1993 5
1994 5
1995 1
1996 0
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 1
2010 4
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 0
2015 1
2016 4
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 4
2021 1
2022 13
2023 6
2024 5
2025 11
2026 3
Total 161
Download as CSV

David M. Garner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Garner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Garner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Garner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David M. Garner is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant contribution to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other notable subfields include Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work spans several key topics, among which Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control is the most prominent. Additional research interests include Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology, Coffee Research and Impacts, Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies, Eating Disorders and Behaviors, Cardiac Health and Mental Health, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

David M. Garner has been published frequently in the following venues:

  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Nitrate Derived From Beetroot Juice Lowers Blood Pressure in Patients With Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" (2022, Frontiers in Nutrition)
  • "Making Family-Centered Care for Adults in the ICU a Reality" (2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • "Dalbavancin as sequential therapy for infective endocarditis due to Gram-positive organisms: a review" (2023, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents)
  • "Social distancing measures may have reduced the estimated deaths related to Covid-19 in Brazil" (2020, Journal of Human Growth and Development)
  • "Beetroot (Beta Vulgaris L.) Extract Acutely Improves Heart Rate Variability Recovery Following Strength Exercise: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial-Pilot Study" (2020, Journal of the American College of Nutrition)

They have collaborated extensively with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Vítor Engrácia Valenti
  • Andrey Alves Porto
  • Cicero Jonas R. Benjamim
  • Rodrigo Daminello Raimundo
  • Carlos Roberto Bueno Júnior

Best Publications

  • The eating attitudes test: psychometric features and clinical correlates.

    David M. Garner;Marion P. Olmsted;Yvonne Bohr;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia.

    David M. Garner;Marion P. Olmstead;Janet Polivy

  • The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa.

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Cultural expectations of thinness in women.

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel;Donald Schwartz;Michael Thompson

  • Socio-cultural factors in the development of anorexia nervosa

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Anorexia Nervosa : A Multidimensional Perspective

    Paul E. Garfinkel;David M. Garner

  • The heterogeneity of anorexia nervosa. Bulimia as a distinct subgroup.

    Paul E. Garfinkel;Harvey Moldofsky;David M. Garner

  • A cognitive-behavioral approach to anorexia nervosa

    David M. Garner;Kelly M. Bemis

  • Confronting the failure of behavioral and dietary treatments for obesity

    David M. Garner;Susan C. Wooley

  • Handbook of treatment for eating disorders

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Body image in anorexia nervosa: measurement, theory and clinical implications.

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Comparison between weight-preoccupied women and anorexia nervosa.

    David M. Garner;Marion P. Olmsted;Janet Polivy;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Handbook of psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa and bulimia

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel

  • Body image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and obesity.

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel;Harvey C. Stancer;Harvey Moldofsky

  • The validity of the distinction between bulimia with and without anorexia nervosa.

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel;Martha O'Shaughnessy

  • Multidimensional body image comparisons among patients with eating disorders, body dysmorphic disorder, and clinical controls: A multisite study

    Joshua I. Hrabosky;Thomas F. Cash;David Veale;Fugen Neziroglu

  • A Prospective Study of Eating Disturbances in the Ballet

    David M. Garner;Paul E. Garfinkel;Wendi Rockert;Marion P. Olmsted

  • Comparison of cognitive-behavioral and supportive-expressive therapy for bulimia nervosa.

    David M. Garner;Wendi Rockert;Ron Davis;Maureen V. Garner

  • Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders (revision)

    C. Bell;C. Bulik;P. Clayton;Scott J Crow

  • Eating Disorder Inventory-2 ; Pro-fessional Manual

    D. M. Garner

  • Eating Disorder Inventory

    Erika Nyman–Carlsson;David M. Garner

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion P. Olmsted
Marion P. Olmsted Centre for Mental Health
Ronald W. Davis
Ronald W. Davis Stanford University
Allan S. Kaplan
Allan S. Kaplan University of Toronto
Christopher G. Fairburn
Christopher G. Fairburn University of Oxford
Janet Polivy
Janet Polivy University of Toronto
Brenda B. Toner
Brenda B. Toner University of Toronto
Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Cynthia M. Bulik
Cynthia M. Bulik University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London
Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career options, ranging from clinical practice to counseling and social work. Online psychology programs can offer flexibility and help meet educational requirements for in-demand roles.

For those looking into behavior analysis, the path to becoming a bcba in Wisconsin or becoming a bcba in Wyoming involves meeting specific educational and licensure criteria. Online degrees in psychology or applied behavior analysis may help fulfill these requirements, but students need to review their state guidelines closely.

Social work is another rewarding career option for psychology graduates. Understanding state-specific regulations is crucial, such as meeting Alabama social work license requirements or complying with Alaska social work license requirements. Online MSW (Master of Social Work) programs can help students prepare for these pathways while accommodating busy schedules.

No matter the direction, researching degree options, online program accreditation, and state licensure regulations can set you on the path toward a fulfilling psychology or social work career.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Garner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles