World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
74
Citations
51883
World Ranking
563
National Ranking
266

David J. Chalmers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 219 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

David J. Chalmers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Chalmers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

David J. Chalmers is a researcher affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on fields related to Medicine, with a specialization in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Urology, Rheumatology, and Gastroenterology.

Their research output includes numerous publications in well-known venues, particularly within the domain of urology and pediatric health. Frequent publication venues include:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Pediatric Urology
  • Urology

David J. Chalmers's research topics cover a range of pediatric and urological health concerns, such as:

  • Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
  • Genital Health and Disease
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Hernia repair and management
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments

Their recent papers include:

  • Neonatal multicystic dysplastic kidney with mass effect: A systematic review, 2021, Journal of Pediatric Urology
  • Antireflux Surgery at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Hospitals, 2020, The Journal of Urology
  • Resolution of post-circumcision penile adhesions in newborns, 2021, Journal of Pediatric Urology
  • Expert Consensus on Pediatric Urodynamics Reporting Using Modified Delphi Technique, 2024, The Journal of Urology
  • Leveraging NSQIPP testicular torsion process measures: Initial survey of the NSQIPP testicular torsion collaborative, 2025, Journal of Pediatric Urology

Throughout their career, David J. Chalmers frequently collaborated with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Stacy T. Tanaka
  • Anne G. Dudley
  • Hans G. Pohl
  • Rebecca Zee
  • Kyle O. Rove

Their contributions to medicine were recognized by the award of Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2013.

Best Publications

  • The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory

    David Chalmers

  • The Extended Mind

    Andy Clark;David J. Chalmers

  • Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness

    David J. Chalmers

  • The Conscious Mind

    David Chalmers

  • The Character of Consciousness

    David John Chalmers

  • Consciousness and its Place in Nature

    David J. Chalmers

  • Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation

    David J. Chalmers;Frank Jackson

  • Strong and Weak Emergence

    David J. Chalmers

  • The foundations of two-dimensional semantics

    David Chalmers

  • Does Conceivability Entail Possibility

    David Chalmers

  • The Representational Character of Experience

    David Chalmers

  • Perception and the fall from Eden

    David Chalmers

  • The puzzle of conscious experience.

    David J. Chalmers

  • Constructing the World

    David John Chalmers

  • Philosophy of Mind : Classical and Contemporary Readings

    David John Chalmers

  • High-level perception, representation, and analogy: a critique of artificial-intelligence methodology

    David Chalmers;Robert French;Douglas Hofstadter

  • What do philosophers believe

    David Bourget;David J. Chalmers

  • Metametaphysics : new essays on the foundations of ontology

    David John Chalmers;David Manley;Ryan Wasserman

  • The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief

    David Chalmers

  • The Singularity: a Philosophical Analysis

    David J. Chalmers

  • A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition

    David J. Chalmers

  • Epistemic Two Dimensional Semantics

    David J. Chalmers

  • What is the unity of consciousness

    Timothy J. Bayne;David J. Chalmers

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen W. Marshall
Stephen W. Marshall University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stephen J. Page
Stephen J. Page University of Hertfordshire
Sheila M. Williams
Sheila M. Williams University of Otago
Jonathan B. Kotch
Jonathan B. Kotch University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Phil A. Silva
Phil A. Silva University of Otago
Caroline F. Finch
Caroline F. Finch Edith Cowan University
Paul McCrory
Paul McCrory Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Michelle Torok
Michelle Torok Black Dog Institute
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Laurie R. Santos
Laurie R. Santos Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students seek flexible, accelerated options to earn advanced credentials while managing work or other obligations. Popular choices include the shortest online psyd programs, which help fast-track a career in clinical psychology, and mft online programs for those interested in marriage and family therapy.

Cost is a major concern for prospective students. Finding a masters in psychology online cheap can make advanced study more accessible, reducing financial barriers. For those focused on leadership roles in education, online edd fast-track programs provide a streamlined pathway to doctoral qualifications.

Overall, choosing an online degree can offer convenience, affordability, and a wide range of career possibilities within the social sciences and humanities. Researching program formats, tuition costs, and career outcomes is essential to finding the option that matches your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Chalmers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles