World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
3506
World Ranking
14141
National Ranking
685

Dave Randall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dave Randall sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 98 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dave Randall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dave Randall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dave Randall is affiliated with the University of Siegen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science and social sciences. Their research integrates both technical and societal perspectives, emphasizing human-computer interaction and the social dimensions of technology.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences

Their work delves into several subfields such as:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Demography
  • Communication

Key topics explored by Dave Randall cover:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • AI in Service Interactions

Their recent publications showcase a focus on participatory design, care and technology, and political aspects of digital interaction. Notable papers include:

  • "Care Workers Making Use of Robots: Results of a Three-Month Study on Human-Robot Interaction within a Care Home" (2022), published at CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Digital Technology at the Edge of Capitalism" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "What is the Topic of the Group, Please? On Migration, Care and the Challenges of Participation in Design" (2021), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "The Personal is the Political: Internet Filtering and Counter Appropriation in the Islamic Republic of Iran" (2022), published in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
  • "Situated Scaffolding for Sustainable Participatory Design" (2022), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Their research output has been presented in multiple venues, with a frequent presence in:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
  • Interacting with Computers
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Volker Wulf
  • Volkmar Pipek
  • Gaia Mosconi
  • Helena Karasti
  • Max Krüger

Best Publications

  • Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control

    R. Bentley;J. A. Hughes;D. Randall;T. Rodden

  • From ethnographic record to system design

    John A. Hughes;Dave W. Randall;Dan Shapiro

  • Fieldwork for Design

    Dave Randall;Richard Harper;Mark Rouncefield

  • 'On the ground' in Sidi Bouzid: investigating social media use during the tunisian revolution

    Volker Wulf;Kaoru Misaki;Meryem Atam;David Randall

  • Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice (Computer Supported Cooperative Work)

    Dave Randall;Richard Harper;Mark Rouncefield

  • Designing for Those who are Overlooked: Insider Perspectives on Care Practices and Cooperative Work of Elderly Informal Caregivers

    Marén Schorch;Lin Wan;David William Randall;Volker Wulf

  • Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village

    Volker Wulf;Konstantin Aal;Ibrahim Abu Kteish;Meryem Atam

  • CSCW: Discipline or Paradigm?

    John Hughes;Dave Randall;Dan Shapiro

  • What People Do with Consumption Feedback: A Long-Term Living Lab Study of a Home Energy Management System

    Tobias Schwartz;Gunnar Stevens;Timo Jakobi;Sebastian Denef

  • Ambiguities, awareness and economy: a study of emergency service work

    Mårten Pettersson;Dave Randall;Bo Helgeson

  • Some ’real’ problems of ’virtual’ organisation

    John A. Hughes;Jon O'Brien;David Randall;Mark Rouncefield

  • Designing with ethnography: making work visible

    John A. Hughes;Ian Somerville;Richard Bentley;Dave Randall

  • Information and Expertise Sharing in Inter-Organizational Crisis Management

    Benedikt Ley;Thomas Ludwig;Volkmar Pipek;Dave Randall

  • Practice-Based Computing: Empirically Grounded Conceptualizations Derived from Design Case Studies

    Volker Wulf;Claudia Müller;Volkmar Pipek;David Randall

  • Out of Syria: Mobile Media in Use at the Time of Civil War

    Markus Rohde;Konstantin Aal;Kaoru Misaki;Dave W. Randall

  • The past is a different place: they do things differently there

    R. Harper;D. Randall;N. Smyth;C. Evans

  • Living Inside a Smart Home: A Case Study

    Dave Randall

  • Chalk and cheese: BPR and ethnomethodologically informed ethnography in CSCW

    Dave Randall;Mark Rouncefield;John A. Hughes

  • Thanks for the memory

    R. Harper;D. Randall;N. Smythe;C. Evans

  • ICT-development in residential care settings: sensitizing design to the life circumstances of the residents of a care home

    Claudia Müller;Cornelius Neufeldt;David Randall;Volker Wulf

  • Social dependency and mobile autonomy: supporting older adults' mobility with ridesharing ict

    Johanna Meurer;Martin Stein;David Randall;Markus Rohde

  • Organisational memory and CSCW: supporting the 'Mavis Phenomenon'

    D. Randall;J. O'Brien;M. Rouncefield;J.A. Hughes

  • Evolving Needs in IoT Control and Accountability: A Longitudinal Study on Smart Home Intelligibility

    Timo Jakobi;Gunnar Stevens;Nico Castelli;Corinna Ogonowski

  • Citizen-Centered Design in Urban Planning: How Augmented Reality can be used in Citizen Participation Processes

    Sheree May Saßmannshausen;Jörg Radtke;Nino Bohn;Hassan Hussein

  • CSCW: discipline or paradigm? a sociological perspective

    Joh Hughes;Dave Randall;Dan Shapiro

  • Local expertise at an emergency call centre

    Maria Normark;Dave Randall

  • When Plans do not Work Out: How Plans are Used in Software Development Projects

    Kari Rönkkö;Yvonne Dittrich;Dave Randall

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Rouncefield
Mark Rouncefield Lancaster University
Richard Harper
Richard Harper Social Shaping Research
Volker Wulf
Volker Wulf University of Siegen
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Ian Sommerville
Ian Sommerville University of St Andrews
Rob Procter
Rob Procter University of Warwick
Alan L. Rector
Alan L. Rector University of Manchester
Pete Sawyer
Pete Sawyer Aston University
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine
Marc Hassenzahl
Marc Hassenzahl University of Siegen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens up many flexible education options in the USA. Online degrees now cater to a wide range of students, offering accessibility and affordability without compromising quality.

For those eager to advance quickly, quickest masters degree online programs can help you gain advanced skills in less time. Many students also seek out most in demand masters degrees for better job prospects and industry relevance.

Not ready for a full four-year program? online associate degree programs offer a solid foundation in Computer Science or IT and often transfer easily to bachelor’s degree pathways. These can serve as a stepping stone into entry-level tech roles or further study.

Concerned about tuition costs? Many affordable online colleges provide high-quality Computer Science degrees at a fraction of the cost, giving you a strong return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Dave Randall

Trending Scientists