World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7613
World Ranking
7350
National Ranking
328

Daniel G. Wright publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Wright sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 97 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel G. Wright D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel G. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel G. Wright was affiliated with the Bedford Institute of Oceanography in Canada during their research career. Their work primarily focused on social sciences, with a notable concentration in gender studies.

The main topics covered in their research included:

  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality

The scientist's publication record spanned several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSM - Qualitative Research in Health

Frequent collaborators in their research included:

  • Karel Adámek
  • Wesley Armour
  • Kathy McKay
  • Dwayne Kennedy
  • P. B. Young

Their recent papers reflected a blend of methodological and thematic interests spanning astronomy-related techniques and gender discourse. Notable recent publications were:

  • CLEAN algorithm implementation comparisons between popular software packages, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Distribution of the Högbom CLEAN Algorithm Using Tiled Images with Feedback, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "I was being true to myself": Listening to young people talk about gender identity and transition, 2025, SSM - Qualitative Research in Health

Best Publications

  • The composition of Standard Seawater and the definition of the Reference-Composition Salinity Scale

    Frank J. Millero;Rainer Feistel;Daniel G. Wright;Trevor J. McDougall

  • Rapid transitions of the Ocean's deep circulation induced by changes in surface water fluxes

    Thomas F. Stocker;Daniel G. Wright

  • A Zonally Averaged, Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model for Paleoclimate Studies

    Thomas F. Stocker;Daniel G. Wright;Lawrence A. Mysak

  • Annual Velocity Variations in the Labrador Current

    J. R. N. Lazier;D. G. Wright

  • Accurate and Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Potential Temperature and Density of Seawater

    Trevor J. McDougall;David R. Jackett;Daniel G. Wright;Rainer Feistel

  • A Zonally Averaged Ocean Model for the Thermohaline Circulation. Part I: Model Development and Flow Dynamics

    Daniel G. Wright;Thomas F. Stocker

  • Interpretations of the JEBAR Term

    Gordon Mertz;Daniel G. Wright

  • The influence of high-latitude surface forcing on the global thermohaline circulation

    Thomas F. Stocker;Daniel G. Wright;Wallace S. Broecker

  • Rapid changes in ocean circulation and atmospheric radiocarbon

    Thomas F. Stocker;Daniel G. Wright

  • Algorithms for Density, Potential Temperature, Conservative Temperature, and the Freezing Temperature of Seawater

    David R. Jackett;Trevor J. McDougall;Rainer Feistel;Daniel G. Wright

  • Density and Absolute Salinity of the Baltic Sea 2006–2009

    R. Feistel;S. Weinreben;H. Wolf;S. Seitz

  • Migration Pathways, Behavioural Thermoregulation and Overwintering Grounds of Blue Sharks in the Northwest Atlantic

    Steven E. Campana;Anna Dorey;Mark Fowler;Warren Joyce

  • Tidal rectification and frontal circulation on the sides of Georges Bank

    John W. Loder;Daniel G. Wright

  • Sensitivities of a zonally averaged global ocean circulation model

    Daniel G. Wright;Thomas F. Stocker

  • Simple measures of climate, soil properties and plant traits predict national‐scale grassland soil carbon stocks

    Peter Manning;Franciska T. de Vries;Franciska T. de Vries;Jerry R. B. Tallowin;Roger Smith

  • Atlantic climate variability and predictability: A CLIVAR perspective

    James W. Hurrell;Martin Visbeck;Antonio J. Busalacchi;R. A. Clarke

  • Absolute Salinity, ''Density Salinity'' and the Reference-Composition Salinity Scale: present and future use in the seawater standard TEOS-10

    D. G. Wright;R. Pawlowicz;T. J. McDougall;R. Feistel

  • A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK

    J.D. Nixon;Daniel Wright;Prasanta Dey;S.K. Ghosh

  • CANDIE: A New Version of the DieCAST Ocean Circulation Model

    Jinyu Sheng;Daniel G. Wright;Richard J. Greatbatch;David E. Dietrich

  • The effects of biogeochemical processes on oceanic conductivity/salinity/ density relationships and the characterization of real seawater

    R. Pawlowicz;D. G. Wright;F. J. Millero

  • Time-Averaged Forms of the Nonlinear Stress Law

    Daniel G. Wright;Keith R. Thompson

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Stocker
Thomas F. Stocker University of Bern
Keith R. Thompson
Keith R. Thompson Dalhousie University
Trevor J. McDougall
Trevor J. McDougall University of New South Wales
John W. Loder
John W. Loder Bedford Institute of Oceanography
Trevor Platt
Trevor Platt Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Lawrence A. Mysak
Lawrence A. Mysak McGill University Health Centre
Wallace S. Broecker
Wallace S. Broecker Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Richard J. Greatbatch
Richard J. Greatbatch GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Jinyu Sheng
Jinyu Sheng Dalhousie University
Frank J. Millero
Frank J. Millero University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that extend beyond traditional scientific roles. Many professionals enhance their expertise by pursuing degrees that complement environmental knowledge with leadership, policy, or social sciences. For instance, enrolling in one of the best online MPA programs can prepare graduates for influential roles in public administration, where they can shape environmental policies and sustainable governance.

Additionally, a foundational understanding of society is crucial for addressing environmental challenges. An online sociology degree bachelors provides insights into human behavior and social structures, essential for community-focused environmental planning and advocacy.

For those pursuing advanced education in education leadership related to environmental studies, programs like an EdD without dissertation offer flexible pathways to doctoral credentials without the traditional dissertation hurdle. Furthermore, bridge options such as the online EdS to EdD bridge program enable educators to progress seamlessly towards doctoral degrees while focusing on environmental education policy and administration.

Exploring these related online degrees can broaden career pathways, helping environmental science students and professionals impact policy, education, and social change effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel G. Wright

Recently Published Articles