World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5447
World Ranking
10331
National Ranking
4330

Dan Lin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan Lin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dan Lin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dan Lin is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domain of computer science, with a total of 47 publications in the field.

Their work delves into several subfields of computer science, including:

  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Signal Processing
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Dan Lin's research topics encompass:

  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Dan Lin include:

  • "Do You Know You Are Tracked by Photos That You Didn't Take": Large-Scale Location-Aware Multi-Party Image Privacy Protection, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • RHPTree-Risk Hierarchical Pattern Tree for Scalable Long Pattern Mining, 2022, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
  • A New Facial Authentication Pitfall and Remedy in Web Services, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Defend Data Poisoning Attacks on Voice Authentication, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Efficient column-oriented processing for mutual subspace skyline queries, 2020, Soft Computing

The venues where Dan Lin frequently publishes their research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Soft Computing
  • ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
  • Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

Dan Lin often collaborates with several co-authors, such as:

  • Sara Newman
  • Kannappan Palaniappan
  • Joshua Morris
  • Jianping Fan
  • Ke Li

Best Publications

  • Query and update efficient B + -tree based indexing of moving objects

    Christian S. Jensen;Dan Lin;Beng Chin Ooi

  • iPrivacy: Image Privacy Protection by Identifying Sensitive Objects via Deep Multi-Task Learning

    Jun Yu;Baopeng Zhang;Zhengzhong Kuang;Dan Lin

  • Ensuring Distributed Accountability for Data Sharing in the Cloud

    S. Sundareswaran;A. Squicciarini;Dan Lin

  • A Brokerage-Based Approach for Cloud Service Selection

    Smitha Sundareswaran;Anna Squicciarini;Dan Lin

  • MoZo: A Moving Zone Based Routing Protocol Using Pure V2V Communication in VANETs

    Dan Lin;Jian Kang;Anna Squicciarini;Yingjie Wu

  • A Survey of Quantification of Privacy Preserving Data Mining Algorithms

    Elisa Bertino;Dan Lin;Wei Jiang

  • Leveraging Content Sensitiveness and User Trustworthiness to Recommend Fine-Grained Privacy Settings for Social Image Sharing

    Jun Yu;Zhenzhong Kuang;Baopeng Zhang;Wei Zhang

  • Continuous Clustering of Moving Objects

    C.S. Jensen;Dan Lin;Beng Chin Ooi

  • An Approach to Evaluate Data Trustworthiness Based on Data Provenance

    Chenyun Dai;Dan Lin;Elisa Bertino;Murat Kantarcioglu

  • Access control policy combining: theory meets practice

    Ninghui Li;Qihua Wang;Wahbeh Qardaji;Elisa Bertino

  • Effective Density Queries on ContinuouslyMoving Objects

    C.S. Jensen;D. Lin;Beng Chin Ooi;Rui Zhang

  • Privacy Policy Inference of User-Uploaded Images on Content Sharing Sites

    Anna Cinzia Squicciarini;Dan Lin;Smitha Sundareswaran;Joshua Wede

  • An algebra for fine-grained integration of XACML policies

    Prathima Rao;Dan Lin;Elisa Bertino;Ninghui Li

  • Efficient indexing of the historical, present, and future positions of moving objects

    Dan Lin;Christian S. Jensen;Beng Chin Ooi;Simonas Šaltenis

  • A benchmark for evaluating moving object indexes

    Su Chen;Christian S. Jensen;Dan Lin

  • Preventing Information Leakage from Indexing in the Cloud

    Anna Squicciarini;Smitha Sundareswaran;Dan Lin

  • A3P: adaptive policy prediction for shared images over popular content sharing sites

    Anna Cinzia Squicciarini;Smitha Sundareswaran;Dan Lin;Josh Wede

  • Information-oriented trustworthiness evaluation in vehicular ad-hoc networks

    Sashi Gurung;Dan Lin;Anna Cinzia Squicciarini;Elisa Bertino

  • An approach to evaluate policy similarity

    Dan Lin;Prathima Rao;Elisa Bertino;Jorge Lobo

  • Conditional privacy-aware role based access control

    Qun Ni;Dan Lin;Elisa Bertino;Jorge Lobo

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna Cinzia Squicciarini
Anna Cinzia Squicciarini Pennsylvania State University
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette
Rui Zhang
Rui Zhang National University of Singapore
Jorge Lobo
Jorge Lobo Pompeu Fabra University
Beng Chin Ooi
Beng Chin Ooi National University of Singapore
Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
Ninghui Li
Ninghui Li Purdue University West Lafayette
Jianping Fan
Jianping Fan University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Sanjay Kumar Madria
Sanjay Kumar Madria Missouri University of Science and Technology
Murat Kantarcioglu
Murat Kantarcioglu The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science online opens up unique opportunities for flexibility and affordability. For those concerned about tuition costs, consider reviewing cheap online colleges. These programs offer quality education without a hefty financial burden, making them appealing for many students.

Not every learner starts with a top academic record. If your grades are less than stellar, don’t worry—there are best colleges for low gpa that welcome determined applicants and support your academic growth.

Online education is broadening, with several alternative degrees and career tracks available. For example, you might want to investigate what fields and roles you can pursue with a background in another area, such as what can you get with an environmental science degree. Cross-disciplinary knowledge is often valued in today’s job market.

If you wish to fast-track your studies, explore the computer science degree online options. Accelerated programs can quickly equip you with the skills needed for high-demand tech careers—helping you enter the workforce sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Dan Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles