World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
75
Citations
17534
World Ranking
5397
National Ranking
2558

Dale J. Benos publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale J. Benos sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 316 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dale J. Benos D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale J. Benos sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dale J. Benos was affiliated with the University of Alabama at Birmingham in the United States. Their research primarily focused on areas within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, complemented by contributions in engineering.

Their main fields of study included:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Engineering

Within these broader areas, their work extended into specialized subfields such as:

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology

Benos's research targeted specific scientific topics, notably:

  • Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Ion Transport and Channel Regulation

One of the documented recent publications by Dale J. Benos includes the paper titled "Proteolytic Cleavage of Human Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1 by the Serine Protease Matriptase", published in 2020 through UNC Libraries.

Their frequent coauthors over the course of their career were:

  • Edlira B. Clark
  • Biljana Jovov
  • Arun K. Rooj
  • Catherine M. Fuller

Benos contributed at least once to the publication venue UNC Libraries, reflecting their engagement with that scholarly community.

Best Publications

  • CFTR Is a Conductance Regulator as well as a Chloride Channel

    Erik M. Schwiebert;Dale J. Benos;Marie E. Egan;Monroe Jack Stutts

  • SUPPRESSION OF A CFTR PREMATURE STOP MUTATION IN A BRONCHIAL EPITHELIAL CELL LINE

    David M. Bedwell;Anisa Kaenjak;Dale J. Benos;Zsuzsa Bebok

  • The ups and downs of peer review.

    Dale J. Benos;Edlira Bashari;Jose M. Chaves;Amit Gaggar

  • Differential gene expression profiling in human brain tumors.

    James M. Markert;Catherine M. Fuller;G. Yancey Gillespie;James K. Bubien

  • CD133 is a marker of bioenergetic stress in human glioma.

    Corinne E. Griguer;Claudia R. Oliva;Eric Gobin;Pascale Marcorelles

  • Ethics and scientific publication

    Dale J. Benos;Jorge Fabres;John Farmer;Jessica P. Gutierrez

  • EPITHELIAL Na+ CHANNELS

    P R Smith;D J Benos

  • Regulation of CFTR chloride channels by syntaxin and Munc18 isoforms

    Anjaparavanda P. Naren;Deborah J. Nelson;Weiwen Xie;Biljana Jovov

  • Amiloride-sensitive sodium channel is linked to the cytoskeleton in renal epithelial cells.

    Peter R. Smith;Gaetano Saccomani;Eun-Hye Joe;Kimon J. Angelides

  • Cloning of an Epithelial Chloride Channel from Bovine Trachea

    Sonia A. Cunningham;Mouhamed S. Awayda;James K. Bubien;Iskander I. Ismailov

  • Polarization-dependent apical membrane CFTR targeting underlies cAMP-stimulated Cl- secretion in epithelial cells

    A. P. Morris;S. A. Cunningham;A. Tousson;D. J. Benos

  • TNF-alpha- and IFN-gamma-mediated signal transduction pathways: effects on glial cell gene expression and function.

    Etty N. Benveniste;Dale J. Benos

  • Functional domains within the degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (Deg/ENaC) superfamily of ion channels

    Dale J. Benos;Bruce A. Stanton

  • Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator facilitates ATP release by stimulating a separate ATP release channel for autocrine control of cell volume regulation

    Gavin M. Braunstein;Richard M. Roman;John P. Clancy;Brian A. Kudlow

  • Mammalian blastocyst: transport functions in a developing epithelium

    J. D. Biggers;J. E. Bell;D. J. Benos

  • The amiloride-sensitive sodium channel.

    S. Sariban-Sohraby;D. J. Benos

  • Structure and function of amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels

    D. J. Benos;M. S. Awayda;I. I. Ismailov;J. P. Johnson

  • Regulation of Epithelial Sodium Channels by the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator

    Iskander I. Ismailov;Mouhamed S. Awayda;Biljana Jovov;Bakhram K. Berdiev

  • Regulation of Epithelial Sodium Channels by Short Actin Filaments

    Bakhram K. Berdiev;Adriana G. Prat;Horacio F. Cantiello;Dennis A. Ausiello

  • How to review a paper.

    Dale J. Benos;Kevin L. Kirk;John E. Hall

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine M. Fuller
Catherine M. Fuller University of Alabama at Birmingham
Sadis Matalon
Sadis Matalon University of Alabama at Birmingham
Etty N. Benveniste
Etty N. Benveniste University of Alabama at Birmingham
Eric J. Sorscher
Eric J. Sorscher Emory University
G. Yancey Gillespie
G. Yancey Gillespie University of Alabama at Birmingham
Erik M. Schwiebert
Erik M. Schwiebert University of Alabama at Birmingham
Dennis A. Ausiello
Dennis A. Ausiello Harvard University
Gergely L. Lukacs
Gergely L. Lukacs McGill University
Horacio F. Cantiello
Horacio F. Cantiello Harvard University
Beatrice H. Hahn
Beatrice H. Hahn University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to a wide range of careers in healthcare, research, and the life sciences. Many students are now considering related fields to boost their job prospects and specialize further. Online education provides flexibility for pursuing these pathways alongside other commitments.

Graduate programs such as an online nutrition masters are popular for those interested in clinical nutrition, wellness programs, or research. Those aiming to work directly in medical imaging may consider the ultrasound tech programs online or pursue accredited best online radiology tech programs, which can lead to opportunities in diagnostics and patient care.

For students who want to focus on the dietary side of biology, accredited best dietetics programs are available to prepare for roles in hospitals, public health agencies, or private practice. Online degrees not only offer affordability and convenience but also equip graduates for in-demand, science-driven careers in healthcare and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Dale J. Benos

Recently Published Articles