World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Craig A. Smith

Craig A. Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
24352
World Ranking
9456
National Ranking
247

Craig A. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 147 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Craig A. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Craig A. Smith is affiliated with Monash University in Australia and focuses on research within the domains of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their work encompasses key subfields such as Genetics, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's research emphasizes several main topics, including:

  • Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Congenital Heart Defects Research
  • Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Craig A. Smith has contributed to multiple research articles published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Development, Endocrinology, and Developmental Dynamics. Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Smith include:

  • Insights into Gonadal Sex Differentiation Provided by Single-Cell Transcriptomics in the Chicken Embryo (2020, Cell Reports)
  • Gonadal Sex Differentiation: Supporting Versus Steroidogenic Cell Lineage Specification in Mammals and Birds (2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology)
  • Genetic Regulation of Avian Testis Development (2021, Genes)
  • Anatomy, Endocrine Regulation, and Embryonic Development of the Rete Testis (2021, Endocrinology)
  • Applying Single-Cell Analysis to Gonadogenesis and DSDs (Disorders/Differences of Sex Development) (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Andrew T. Major, Martín A. Estermann, Axel H. Newton, Sarah Williams, and Claire E. Hirst. These co-authors have appeared in numerous joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis

    Steven R. Wiley;Ken Schooley;Pamela J. Smolak;Wenie S. Din

  • The TNF receptor superfamily of cellular and viral proteins: Activation, costimulation, and death

    Craig A. Smith;Terry Farrah;Raymond G. Goodwin

  • Molecular and biological characterization of a murine ligand for CD40

    Richard J. Armitage;William C. Fanslow;Laura Strockbine;Timothy A. Sato

  • Soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors are effective therapeutic agents in lethal endotoxemia and function simultaneously as both TNF carriers and TNF antagonists.

    K. M. Mohler;D. S. Torrance;C. A. Smith;R. G. Goodwin

  • The murine interleukin-4 receptor: Molecular cloning and characterization of secreted and membrane bound forms

    Bruce Mosley;M.Patricia Beckmann;Carl J. March;Rejean L. Idzerda

  • The avian Z-linked gene DMRT1 is required for male sex determination in the chicken

    Craig A. Smith;Kelly N. Roeszler;Thomas Ohnesorg;David M. Cummins

  • CD30 antigen, a marker for Hodgkin's lymphoma, is a receptor whose ligand defines an emerging family of cytokines with homology to TNF

    Craig A. Smith;Hans Juergen Gruss;Terri Davis;Dirk Anderson

  • A Novel TNF Receptor Family Member Binds TWEAK and Is Implicated in Angiogenesis

    Steven R Wiley;Linda Cassiano;Timothy Lofton;Terry Davis-Smith

  • Molecular cloning of a ligand for the inducible T cell gene 4-1BB: a member of an emerging family of cytokines with homology to tumor necrosis factor.

    Raymond G. Goodwin;Wenie S. Din;Terri Davis-Smith;Dirk M. Anderson

  • Pleiotropic effects of the CD30 ligand on CD30-expressing cells and lymphoma cell lines

    Hans-JOrgen Gruss;Norman Boiani;Douglas E. Williams;Richard J. Armitage

  • Molecular and biological characterization of a ligand for CD27 defines a new family of cytokines with homology to tumor necrosis factor

    Raymond G. Goodwin;Mark R. Alderson;Craig A. Smith;Richard J. Armitage

  • Sex determination: insights from the chicken.

    Craig A. Smith;Andrew H. Sinclair

  • Molecular and biological characterization of human 4-1BB and its ligand.

    Mark R. Alderson;Craig A. Smith;Teresa W. Tough;Terri Davis-Smith

  • Conservation of a sex-determining gene

    Craig A. Smith;Peter J. McClive;Patrick S. Western;Kirsty J. Reed

  • Molecular cloning and expression of the type 1 and type 2 murine receptors for tumor necrosis factor.

    Raymond G. Goodwin;Dirk Anderson;Rita Jerzy;Terri Davis

  • Reverse signaling via CD30 ligand.

    S R Wiley;R G Goodwin;C A Smith

  • Sites of estrogen receptor and aromatase expression in the chicken embryo.

    Jane E. Andrews;Craig A. Smith;Andrew H. Sinclair

  • Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor expression in T lymphocytes. Differential regulation of the type I TNF receptor during activation of resting and effector T cells.

    C F Ware;P D Crowe;T L Vanarsdale;J L Andrews

  • Poxvirus Genomes Encode a Secreted, Soluble Protein That Preferentially Inhibits β Chemokine Activity yet Lacks Sequence Homology to Known Chemokine Receptors☆

    Craig A. Smith;Terri Davis Smith;Pamela J. Smolak;Della Friend

  • DMRT1 Is Upregulated in the Gonads During Female-to-Male Sex Reversal in ZW Chicken Embryos

    Craig A. Smith;Melissa Katz;Andrew H. Sinclair

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew H. Sinclair
Andrew H. Sinclair University of Melbourne
John E. Sims
John E. Sims Amgen (United States)
Alicia Oshlack
Alicia Oshlack Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Peter Koopman
Peter Koopman University of Queensland
David M. Lambert
David M. Lambert Griffith University
Josephine Bowles
Josephine Bowles University of Queensland
David W. Burt
David W. Burt University of Queensland
Thomas Haaf
Thomas Haaf University of Würzburg
Martien A. M. Groenen
Martien A. M. Groenen Wageningen University & Research
Mylene M. Mariette
Mylene M. Mariette Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Craig A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles